Out-of-Pocket Expenditure and its Determinants Amongst the Patients Undergoing Advanced Radiological Procedures in the Public Healthcare Facilities of Tamil Nadu, South India.
Dhanajayan Govindan, Suthanthira Kannan, Deivasigamani Kuberan, Arivarasan Barathi, Venmathi Elangovan, Afrith John Poul, Muneera Parveen, Marie Gilbert Majella, Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy
{"title":"Out-of-Pocket Expenditure and its Determinants Amongst the Patients Undergoing Advanced Radiological Procedures in the Public Healthcare Facilities of Tamil Nadu, South India.","authors":"Dhanajayan Govindan, Suthanthira Kannan, Deivasigamani Kuberan, Arivarasan Barathi, Venmathi Elangovan, Afrith John Poul, Muneera Parveen, Marie Gilbert Majella, Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced radiological procedures, such as CT, MRI, and PET scans, are crucial for accurate diagnostics and treatment planning but often result in substantial out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPE) for patients, especially in developing countries like India. Despite progressive health policies in Tamil Nadu, the financial burden on patients undergoing these procedures in public healthcare facilities remains a concern. Hence, this study was done to assess the OOPE and its determinants amongst patients undergoing CT, MRI and PET scan procedures in public healthcare facilities of Tamil Nadu.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analysed OOPE among 2415 patients undergoing advanced radiological procedures in public healthcare facilities across 12 districts in Tamil Nadu. A two-step sampling strategy was employed to select 23 healthcare facilities. Patient-level costs were calculated, including direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs. Determinants of OOPE were assessed using log-linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PET scans were the costliest procedure, with median total cost per patient of INR 12,150 (USD 147.14), primarily due to direct medical expenses. Median total costs per patient for CT and MRI scans were INR 1460 (USD 17.68) and INR 3250 (USD 39.36), respectively. Factors significantly associated with higher OOPE included urban residence (e^β = 1.13 for CT; 1.17 for MRI), higher socioeconomic status (e^β = 1.25 for Class I vs. V in CT; 1.45 for Class I vs. V in MRI), lack of insurance utilisation (e^β = 1.75 for CT; 3.73 for MRI), absence of insurance (e^β = 1.89 for CT; 3.85 for MRI), greater travel distance (e^β = 1.51 for CT; 1.56 for MRI), and longer waiting times (e^β = 1.21 for CT).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals significant financial burdens on patients undergoing advanced radiological procedures, highlighting the need for policy reforms to enhance insurance coverage utilisation, reduce urban-rural disparities, and improve access to affordable care. Addressing these determinants is crucial for reducing OOPE and ensuring equitable access to essential diagnostic services.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Advanced radiological procedures, such as CT, MRI, and PET scans, are crucial for accurate diagnostics and treatment planning but often result in substantial out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPE) for patients, especially in developing countries like India. Despite progressive health policies in Tamil Nadu, the financial burden on patients undergoing these procedures in public healthcare facilities remains a concern. Hence, this study was done to assess the OOPE and its determinants amongst patients undergoing CT, MRI and PET scan procedures in public healthcare facilities of Tamil Nadu.
Methods: This cross-sectional study analysed OOPE among 2415 patients undergoing advanced radiological procedures in public healthcare facilities across 12 districts in Tamil Nadu. A two-step sampling strategy was employed to select 23 healthcare facilities. Patient-level costs were calculated, including direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs. Determinants of OOPE were assessed using log-linear regression models.
Results: PET scans were the costliest procedure, with median total cost per patient of INR 12,150 (USD 147.14), primarily due to direct medical expenses. Median total costs per patient for CT and MRI scans were INR 1460 (USD 17.68) and INR 3250 (USD 39.36), respectively. Factors significantly associated with higher OOPE included urban residence (e^β = 1.13 for CT; 1.17 for MRI), higher socioeconomic status (e^β = 1.25 for Class I vs. V in CT; 1.45 for Class I vs. V in MRI), lack of insurance utilisation (e^β = 1.75 for CT; 3.73 for MRI), absence of insurance (e^β = 1.89 for CT; 3.85 for MRI), greater travel distance (e^β = 1.51 for CT; 1.56 for MRI), and longer waiting times (e^β = 1.21 for CT).
Conclusions: The study reveals significant financial burdens on patients undergoing advanced radiological procedures, highlighting the need for policy reforms to enhance insurance coverage utilisation, reduce urban-rural disparities, and improve access to affordable care. Addressing these determinants is crucial for reducing OOPE and ensuring equitable access to essential diagnostic services.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.