Psychometric Properties of the Latvian LPFS-SR in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Agnese Zagorska, Anna Briede, Ksenija Vasiļjeva, Evija Strika, Ieva Stokenberga
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Latvian LPFS-SR in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.","authors":"Agnese Zagorska, Anna Briede, Ksenija Vasiļjeva, Evija Strika, Ieva Stokenberga","doi":"10.1002/pmh.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the psychometric properties of the Latvian adaptation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SR) and its alignment with the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). A clinical sample (N = 142) and a nonclinical sample (N = 306) were formed. Internal consistency, factor structure, and criterion validity were assessed to evaluate the scale's psychometric properties. Confirmatory factor analysis compared five structural models: one-factor, two-factor, four-factor, higher order, and bifactor. The bifactor model demonstrated the best fit, capturing both general and subscale-specific variance in personality functioning. Correlation and regression analyses explored associations between the LPFS-SR and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The findings support the Latvian LPFS-SR as a valid and reliable tool for assessing personality functioning and are consistent with the principles of the AMPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":"19 3","pages":"e70028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the psychometric properties of the Latvian adaptation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SR) and its alignment with the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). A clinical sample (N = 142) and a nonclinical sample (N = 306) were formed. Internal consistency, factor structure, and criterion validity were assessed to evaluate the scale's psychometric properties. Confirmatory factor analysis compared five structural models: one-factor, two-factor, four-factor, higher order, and bifactor. The bifactor model demonstrated the best fit, capturing both general and subscale-specific variance in personality functioning. Correlation and regression analyses explored associations between the LPFS-SR and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The findings support the Latvian LPFS-SR as a valid and reliable tool for assessing personality functioning and are consistent with the principles of the AMPD.

拉脱维亚LPFS-SR在临床和非临床样本中的心理测量特性。
本研究考察了拉脱维亚人对人格功能水平自我报告(LPFS-SR)的适应性及其与DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的一致性。临床样本142例,非临床样本306例。通过内部一致性、因素结构和标准效度来评估量表的心理测量特性。验证性因子分析比较了五种结构模型:一因素、二因素、四因素、高阶和双因素。双因素模型证明了最佳拟合,捕获了人格功能的一般和子尺度特定方差。相关分析和回归分析探讨了LPFS-SR与DSM-5 (PID-5)人格量表之间的关系。研究结果支持拉脱维亚LPFS-SR作为评估人格功能的有效和可靠的工具,并且与AMPD的原则一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信