Stroke in the Setting of Neurosyphilis: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Juan Felipe Daza-Ovalle, Jose-Alejandro Ramirez-Penuela, David Ramirez-Castro, Charles Esenwa
{"title":"Stroke in the Setting of Neurosyphilis: A Comprehensive Literature Review.","authors":"Juan Felipe Daza-Ovalle, Jose-Alejandro Ramirez-Penuela, David Ramirez-Castro, Charles Esenwa","doi":"10.1177/19418744251355654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> syphilis is globally recognized as a great imitator due to its multiple manifestations and multi-organ involvement. This holds especially true in the context of neurosyphilis (NS), where stroke and other cerebrovascular manifestations are frequently overlooked. With the global reemergence of syphilis, meningovascular syphilis (MVS) and other vascular syphilitic affectations are now important, yet underdiagnosed causes of ischemic stroke. <b>Purpose:</b> this literature review focuses on syphilis in the context of stroke, examining the condition through this specific perspective. The pathophysiological aspect focuses on immune-mediated endothelial injury and vascular inflammation as main mechanisms leading to stroke. <b>Analysis:</b> a broader approach to syphilis is initially described, showcasing the comprehensive medical workup necessary for accurate diagnosis of MVS and special treatment considerations. Diagnostic challenges of NS are initially exposed, with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and neuroimaging playing critical roles. While CSF-VDRL remains the gold standard, although, its low sensitivity necessitates a multimodal diagnostic approach combining serological, clinical, and radiographic findings. MRI and angiographic studies often reveal concentric steno-occlusive arteriopathy, most commonly affecting the middle cerebral and basilar arteries. Early recognition is vital, as NS can mimic common neurovascular etiologies, particularly in the context of younger adults without traditional risk factors. Treatment involves intravenous penicillin G, corticosteroids and antiplatelet agents playing supportive roles. However, clinicians must weigh bleeding risks in specific cases, particularly in patients with syphilitic aneurysmal disease. <b>Conclusions:</b> timely diagnosis and treatment of NS and MVS are essential to prevent irreversible neurological damage and contribute to the reduction of global stroke burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"19418744251355654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744251355654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: syphilis is globally recognized as a great imitator due to its multiple manifestations and multi-organ involvement. This holds especially true in the context of neurosyphilis (NS), where stroke and other cerebrovascular manifestations are frequently overlooked. With the global reemergence of syphilis, meningovascular syphilis (MVS) and other vascular syphilitic affectations are now important, yet underdiagnosed causes of ischemic stroke. Purpose: this literature review focuses on syphilis in the context of stroke, examining the condition through this specific perspective. The pathophysiological aspect focuses on immune-mediated endothelial injury and vascular inflammation as main mechanisms leading to stroke. Analysis: a broader approach to syphilis is initially described, showcasing the comprehensive medical workup necessary for accurate diagnosis of MVS and special treatment considerations. Diagnostic challenges of NS are initially exposed, with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and neuroimaging playing critical roles. While CSF-VDRL remains the gold standard, although, its low sensitivity necessitates a multimodal diagnostic approach combining serological, clinical, and radiographic findings. MRI and angiographic studies often reveal concentric steno-occlusive arteriopathy, most commonly affecting the middle cerebral and basilar arteries. Early recognition is vital, as NS can mimic common neurovascular etiologies, particularly in the context of younger adults without traditional risk factors. Treatment involves intravenous penicillin G, corticosteroids and antiplatelet agents playing supportive roles. However, clinicians must weigh bleeding risks in specific cases, particularly in patients with syphilitic aneurysmal disease. Conclusions: timely diagnosis and treatment of NS and MVS are essential to prevent irreversible neurological damage and contribute to the reduction of global stroke burden.

神经梅毒背景下的脑卒中:综合文献综述。
背景:梅毒因其多表现和多器官累及而被全球公认为是一个伟大的模仿者。在神经梅毒(NS)中尤其如此,其中中风和其他脑血管表现经常被忽视。随着梅毒在全球范围内的再次出现,脑膜炎血管梅毒(MVS)和其他血管梅毒感染现在是重要的,但未被诊断的缺血性卒中病因。目的:本文献综述的重点是梅毒在中风的背景下,检查条件通过这一特定的角度。病理生理方面的重点是免疫介导的内皮损伤和血管炎症是导致中风的主要机制。分析:最初描述了一种更广泛的梅毒方法,展示了准确诊断MVS和特殊治疗考虑所必需的全面医疗检查。诊断NS的挑战最初暴露,脑脊液(CSF)分析和神经影像学发挥关键作用。虽然CSF-VDRL仍然是金标准,但其低灵敏度需要结合血清学,临床和放射学检查结果的多模式诊断方法。MRI和血管造影经常显示同心狭窄闭塞性动脉病变,最常影响大脑中动脉和基底动脉。早期识别是至关重要的,因为NS可以模仿常见的神经血管病因,特别是在没有传统危险因素的年轻人的情况下。治疗包括静脉注射青霉素G,皮质类固醇和抗血小板药物发挥支持作用。然而,临床医生必须在特定情况下权衡出血风险,特别是在患有梅毒动脉瘤疾病的患者中。结论:及时诊断和治疗NS和MVS对于预防不可逆的神经损伤和减少全球卒中负担至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信