{"title":"Prostate cancer screening: Knowledge, attitudes and practices in a sample of men in Ramotswa, Botswana.","authors":"Roy Tapera, Tshiamo Tshwaedi, Baemedi Letsholo, Tshephang Tumoyagae, Patience Erick, Bontle Mbongwe","doi":"10.1177/22799036251349640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) accounts for 21.6% of all cancers among men in Botswana, ranking as the fourth most common cancer (9%) across all age groups. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices related to PCa screening among men aged 40 years and older in Ramotswa, Botswana.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving a random sample of 362 males aged 40 years and older in Ramotswa. Logistics regression models were utilised to examine associations between socio-demographics, knowledge, attitudes, practices and PCa screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 362 respondents, 105 (29%) men reported having undergone prostate screening tests either prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or digital rectal examination (DRE). Additionally, 221 (61%) had prior knowledge of PCa, with 114 (32%) receiving information from the radio while fewer than 20% learnt about it from health care providers. Single men were found to be 63% less likely to go for screening compared to married men (AOR = 0.37; [95% CI 0.22-0.61]). Men who were not afraid of the screening test results were twice as likely to go for screening compared to those who were afraid of a positive result for prostate test (AOR = 2.14; [95% CI 1.12-4.09]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While respondents demonstrated above-average knowledge of PCa, fewer than half had undergone a PSA test. Urgent and targeted interventions are needed to address predisposing factors such as fear of prostate screening. Furthermore, the low rates of PCa information dissemination by healthcare workers underscore the need for enhanced engagement of medical practitioners in educating men about PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"22799036251349640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251349640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) accounts for 21.6% of all cancers among men in Botswana, ranking as the fourth most common cancer (9%) across all age groups. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices related to PCa screening among men aged 40 years and older in Ramotswa, Botswana.
Design and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving a random sample of 362 males aged 40 years and older in Ramotswa. Logistics regression models were utilised to examine associations between socio-demographics, knowledge, attitudes, practices and PCa screening.
Results: Of the 362 respondents, 105 (29%) men reported having undergone prostate screening tests either prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or digital rectal examination (DRE). Additionally, 221 (61%) had prior knowledge of PCa, with 114 (32%) receiving information from the radio while fewer than 20% learnt about it from health care providers. Single men were found to be 63% less likely to go for screening compared to married men (AOR = 0.37; [95% CI 0.22-0.61]). Men who were not afraid of the screening test results were twice as likely to go for screening compared to those who were afraid of a positive result for prostate test (AOR = 2.14; [95% CI 1.12-4.09]).
Conclusions: While respondents demonstrated above-average knowledge of PCa, fewer than half had undergone a PSA test. Urgent and targeted interventions are needed to address predisposing factors such as fear of prostate screening. Furthermore, the low rates of PCa information dissemination by healthcare workers underscore the need for enhanced engagement of medical practitioners in educating men about PCa.
背景:前列腺癌(PCa)占博茨瓦纳男性所有癌症的21.6%,在所有年龄组中排名第四(9%)。本研究旨在评估博茨瓦纳拉莫茨瓦40岁及以上男性前列腺癌筛查相关的知识、态度和做法。设计与方法:在Ramotswa随机抽取362名40岁及以上的男性进行横断面调查。利用logistic回归模型来检验社会人口统计学、知识、态度、实践和PCa筛选之间的关联。结果:在362名受访者中,105名(29%)男性报告接受了前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)或直肠指检(DRE)的前列腺筛查试验。此外,221人(61%)有PCa的先验知识,114人(32%)从广播中获得信息,而从卫生保健提供者那里了解PCa的不到20%。与已婚男性相比,单身男性接受筛查的可能性低63% (AOR = 0.37;[95% ci 0.22-0.61])。不害怕筛查结果的男性接受筛查的可能性是害怕前列腺检查阳性结果的男性的两倍(AOR = 2.14;[95% ci 1.12-4.09])。结论:虽然受访者表现出高于平均水平的PCa知识,但只有不到一半的人接受过PSA测试。需要紧急和有针对性的干预措施来解决诸如对前列腺筛查的恐惧等诱发因素。此外,医疗工作者对前列腺癌信息的传播率较低,这强调了医疗从业人员加强参与前列腺癌教育的必要性。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.