Evaluating Patient Experience with Integrated Virtual Care (IVC), a Hybrid Primary Care Model in Rural Ontario, Canada: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 2.5 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Samantha Buchanan, Shawna Cronin, Antoine St-Amant, Jonathan Fitzsimon
{"title":"Evaluating Patient Experience with Integrated Virtual Care (IVC), a Hybrid Primary Care Model in Rural Ontario, Canada: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Samantha Buchanan, Shawna Cronin, Antoine St-Amant, Jonathan Fitzsimon","doi":"10.1177/21501319251345741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Canada faces a primary care crisis, especially in rural regions. In Ontario, the innovative, Integrated Virtual Care (IVC) program is a hybrid care model that enrolls patients with a family physician working predominantly remotely, while also embedded in a local Family Health Team, blending virtual and in-person care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the experience of patients enrolled in IVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a rural region in eastern Ontario, Canada. Participants included individuals enrolled in IVC for a minimum of 6 months. Primary outcome measures focused on patient experience with IVC, including satisfaction, access, self-reported health, and healthcare utilization. We also examined representativeness of survey respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>198 of 790 patients responded (response rate of 25.1%). Overall satisfaction was high, with 85% reporting being very satisfied or satisfied with IVC. Experiencing issues with virtual care was significantly associated with satisfaction. Survey respondents were generally older, Caucasian, and higher users of the healthcare system compared to a group of all those eligible to complete the survey.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates high patient satisfaction with IVC among survey respondents. These insights can inform the expansion of innovative hybrid care models to meet the needs of underserved, rural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251345741"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251345741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Canada faces a primary care crisis, especially in rural regions. In Ontario, the innovative, Integrated Virtual Care (IVC) program is a hybrid care model that enrolls patients with a family physician working predominantly remotely, while also embedded in a local Family Health Team, blending virtual and in-person care.

Objective: To evaluate the experience of patients enrolled in IVC.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a rural region in eastern Ontario, Canada. Participants included individuals enrolled in IVC for a minimum of 6 months. Primary outcome measures focused on patient experience with IVC, including satisfaction, access, self-reported health, and healthcare utilization. We also examined representativeness of survey respondents.

Results: 198 of 790 patients responded (response rate of 25.1%). Overall satisfaction was high, with 85% reporting being very satisfied or satisfied with IVC. Experiencing issues with virtual care was significantly associated with satisfaction. Survey respondents were generally older, Caucasian, and higher users of the healthcare system compared to a group of all those eligible to complete the survey.

Conclusion: This study indicates high patient satisfaction with IVC among survey respondents. These insights can inform the expansion of innovative hybrid care models to meet the needs of underserved, rural populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估综合虚拟护理(IVC)患者的经验,在农村安大略省混合初级保健模式,加拿大:横断面调查。
加拿大面临初级保健危机,特别是在农村地区。在安大略省,创新的综合虚拟护理(IVC)项目是一种混合护理模式,它为患者登记了一名主要远程工作的家庭医生,同时也嵌入了当地的家庭健康团队,将虚拟和面对面的护理结合在一起。目的:评价下腔静脉插管患者的经验。方法:我们在加拿大安大略省东部的一个农村地区进行了横断面调查。参与者包括在IVC注册至少6个月的个人。主要结果测量侧重于IVC的患者体验,包括满意度、可及性、自我报告的健康状况和医疗保健利用。我们还检验了调查对象的代表性。结果:790例患者中198例缓解,有效率为25.1%。总体满意度很高,85%的人表示非常满意或满意IVC。体验虚拟护理的问题与满意度显著相关。与所有有资格完成调查的人相比,调查对象通常是年龄较大的白人和医疗保健系统的高级用户。结论:调查对象对体外循环手术的满意度较高。这些见解可以为扩展创新的混合护理模式提供信息,以满足服务不足的农村人口的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信