Standardizing The Biochemical Tests for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Where Do We Stand? A National Survey of Laboratories Across Pakistan.

Q2 Medicine
Sibtain Ahmed, Fatima Muhammad Asad Khan, Ghazanfar Abbas, Sahar Iqbal, Mohsin Shafi, Khushbakht Arbab, Rizwan Uppal, Asma Shaukat, Muhammad Dilawar Khan, Muhammad Qaiser Alam Khan, Adnan Mustafa Zubairi, Syed Haider Nawaz Naqvi, Junaid Mahmood Alam, Imran Siddiqui
{"title":"Standardizing The Biochemical Tests for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Where Do We Stand? A National Survey of Laboratories Across Pakistan.","authors":"Sibtain Ahmed, Fatima Muhammad Asad Khan, Ghazanfar Abbas, Sahar Iqbal, Mohsin Shafi, Khushbakht Arbab, Rizwan Uppal, Asma Shaukat, Muhammad Dilawar Khan, Muhammad Qaiser Alam Khan, Adnan Mustafa Zubairi, Syed Haider Nawaz Naqvi, Junaid Mahmood Alam, Imran Siddiqui","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>CKD affects 8.6% of the global population, with South Asian countries seeing prevalence rates between 10.6% and 23.3%, including 21.2% in Pakistan. CKD's burden is further exacerbated in South Asia due to rising hypertension and diabetes. Accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albuminuria are vital for CKD management. Despite increasing CKD studies, regional testing remains underdeveloped. This survey evaluates CKD testing practices in Pakistan, aiming to propose recommendations for improving uniformity, enhancing surveillance, and advancing CKD care standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted by the Chemical Pathology section at Aga Khan University (AKU) using a validated questionnaire developed by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) which was modified for local context. The survey, distributed via Google Forms to major laboratories across Pakistan, focused on CKD testing methods. Data were analyzed using Excel (Microsoft Corporation, 2018) software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 laboratories participated in the survey. All laboratories measured serum creatinine, while two measured serum cystatin C, eleven measured urinary protein, and ten measured urinary albumin. GFR was estimated using equations in 10 laboratories, with CKD-EPI 2021 (29%), MDRD (22%), and CKD-EPI Pak (14%) being the most commonly used. However, only six laboratories employed pediatric equations for children. Significant variability was observed in the testing methods for serum creatinine, urinary protein, and urinary albumin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings emphasize the urgent need to standardize CKD testing in Pakistan. Inconsistencies in estimated GFR reporting, serum creatinine measurement and proteinuria testing highlight the need for harmonized protocols to improve diagnosis, management, and public health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"36 2","pages":"143-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: CKD affects 8.6% of the global population, with South Asian countries seeing prevalence rates between 10.6% and 23.3%, including 21.2% in Pakistan. CKD's burden is further exacerbated in South Asia due to rising hypertension and diabetes. Accurate estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albuminuria are vital for CKD management. Despite increasing CKD studies, regional testing remains underdeveloped. This survey evaluates CKD testing practices in Pakistan, aiming to propose recommendations for improving uniformity, enhancing surveillance, and advancing CKD care standards.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted by the Chemical Pathology section at Aga Khan University (AKU) using a validated questionnaire developed by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) which was modified for local context. The survey, distributed via Google Forms to major laboratories across Pakistan, focused on CKD testing methods. Data were analyzed using Excel (Microsoft Corporation, 2018) software.

Results: A total of 13 laboratories participated in the survey. All laboratories measured serum creatinine, while two measured serum cystatin C, eleven measured urinary protein, and ten measured urinary albumin. GFR was estimated using equations in 10 laboratories, with CKD-EPI 2021 (29%), MDRD (22%), and CKD-EPI Pak (14%) being the most commonly used. However, only six laboratories employed pediatric equations for children. Significant variability was observed in the testing methods for serum creatinine, urinary protein, and urinary albumin.

Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the urgent need to standardize CKD testing in Pakistan. Inconsistencies in estimated GFR reporting, serum creatinine measurement and proteinuria testing highlight the need for harmonized protocols to improve diagnosis, management, and public health outcomes.

标准化慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)生化检测:我们在哪里?巴基斯坦全国实验室调查。
导读:慢性肾病影响全球8.6%的人口,南亚国家的患病率在10.6%至23.3%之间,其中巴基斯坦为21.2%。在南亚,由于高血压和糖尿病的增加,CKD的负担进一步加重。准确估计肾小球滤过率(GFR)和蛋白尿对CKD的治疗至关重要。尽管CKD研究越来越多,但区域检测仍然不发达。本调查评估了巴基斯坦CKD检测实践,旨在提出改善统一性、加强监测和提高CKD护理标准的建议。方法:阿迦汗大学(AKU)化学病理学部门使用国际临床化学联合会(IFCC)开发的有效问卷进行了横断面调查,该问卷根据当地情况进行了修改。该调查通过谷歌表格分发给巴基斯坦各地的主要实验室,重点关注CKD检测方法。数据分析使用Excel (Microsoft Corporation, 2018)软件。结果:共有13家实验室参与调查。所有实验室检测血清肌酐,2个检测血清胱抑素C, 11个检测尿蛋白,10个检测尿白蛋白。GFR使用10个实验室的方程进行估算,其中最常用的是CKD-EPI 2021(29%)、MDRD(22%)和CKD-EPI Pak(14%)。然而,只有六个实验室使用儿童方程式。血清肌酐、尿蛋白和尿白蛋白的检测方法存在显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果强调了巴基斯坦CKD检测标准化的迫切需要。估计GFR报告、血清肌酐测量和蛋白尿检测的不一致突出了需要统一的方案来改善诊断、管理和公共卫生结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信