A National e-Survey of Adult Reference Intervals of Routine Chemistry Analytes Used by Laboratories Across Pakistan: A Step Towards Harmonization.

Q2 Medicine
Nayab Afzal, Hijab Batool, Saba Raza, Salma Ayub, Sibgha Bashir, Asma Hayat, Khushbakht Adnan, Siraj Muneer, Ghazanfar Abbas, Sahar Iqbal, Kiran Imran, Mohsin Shafi, Sibtain Ahmed
{"title":"A National e-Survey of Adult Reference Intervals of Routine Chemistry Analytes Used by Laboratories Across Pakistan: A Step Towards Harmonization.","authors":"Nayab Afzal, Hijab Batool, Saba Raza, Salma Ayub, Sibgha Bashir, Asma Hayat, Khushbakht Adnan, Siraj Muneer, Ghazanfar Abbas, Sahar Iqbal, Kiran Imran, Mohsin Shafi, Sibtain Ahmed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the variation of reference intervals, reporting units used for key blood chemistry parameters in laboratories across Pakistan and to understand the factors contributing to these discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A comprehensive e-questionnaire developed using google forms covering key blood chemistry parameters (Electrolytes, fasting glucose, glucose random urea, creatinine and lipid profile), reference intervals, reporting units, and laboratory practices was administered via email to the Pathologists. Frequency and percentages were calculated for each response and descriptive results were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 38 responses were received five responses were excluded due to incomplete forms. The responses from 33 laboratories revealed substantial variability in reference intervals (RIs) for routine blood chemistry parameters, underscoring a significant lack of standardization. 66.66% laboratories had not developed specific RIs, relying instead on manufacturer-provided RIs, with infrequent reviews or updates. Challenges were prevalent due to non-harmonized RIs, leading to patient and physician counseling issues. Primary obstacles included funding deficiencies and limited access to healthy samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings emphasize the critical need for national regulatory guidelines to standardize RIs, thereby enhancing the reliability and accuracy of laboratory diagnostics in Pakistan.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"36 2","pages":"132-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the variation of reference intervals, reporting units used for key blood chemistry parameters in laboratories across Pakistan and to understand the factors contributing to these discrepancies.

Methodology: A comprehensive e-questionnaire developed using google forms covering key blood chemistry parameters (Electrolytes, fasting glucose, glucose random urea, creatinine and lipid profile), reference intervals, reporting units, and laboratory practices was administered via email to the Pathologists. Frequency and percentages were calculated for each response and descriptive results were also evaluated.

Result: A total of 38 responses were received five responses were excluded due to incomplete forms. The responses from 33 laboratories revealed substantial variability in reference intervals (RIs) for routine blood chemistry parameters, underscoring a significant lack of standardization. 66.66% laboratories had not developed specific RIs, relying instead on manufacturer-provided RIs, with infrequent reviews or updates. Challenges were prevalent due to non-harmonized RIs, leading to patient and physician counseling issues. Primary obstacles included funding deficiencies and limited access to healthy samples.

Conclusion: These findings emphasize the critical need for national regulatory guidelines to standardize RIs, thereby enhancing the reliability and accuracy of laboratory diagnostics in Pakistan.

巴基斯坦实验室使用的常规化学分析的成人参考区间的全国电子调查:迈向统一的一步。
目的:确定巴基斯坦实验室中用于关键血液化学参数的参考区间和报告单位的差异,并了解导致这些差异的因素。方法:使用谷歌表格开发了一份全面的电子问卷,涵盖了关键的血液化学参数(电解质、空腹血糖、葡萄糖随机尿素、肌酐和血脂)、参考区间、报告单位和实验室实践,并通过电子邮件发送给病理学家。计算每个应答的频率和百分比,并对描述性结果进行评估。结果:共收到38份问卷,其中5份因填写不完整而被排除。来自33个实验室的回复显示,常规血液化学参数的参考区间(RIs)存在很大差异,这突出了标准化的严重缺乏。66.66%的实验室没有开发特定的RIs,而是依赖于制造商提供的RIs,很少进行审查或更新。挑战是普遍的,由于不协调的RIs,导致患者和医生的咨询问题。主要障碍包括资金不足和获得健康样本的机会有限。结论:这些发现强调,迫切需要制定国家监管指南,使RIs标准化,从而提高巴基斯坦实验室诊断的可靠性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信