[Multi-scenario Simulation of Production-Living-Ecological Space and Carbon Storage Assessment in Ecological Transition Zone: A Case Study of Gansu Province].

Q2 Environmental Science
Le-Shan Cai, Xiang-Long Tang
{"title":"[Multi-scenario Simulation of Production-Living-Ecological Space and Carbon Storage Assessment in Ecological Transition Zone: A Case Study of Gansu Province].","authors":"Le-Shan Cai, Xiang-Long Tang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202406166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gansu Province is an important ecological security barrier and ecological transition zone in the Chinese ecological security pattern. The study of its production-living-ecological space (PLES) transformation and its carbon storage effect is of great significance for realizing space optimization and regional sustainable development from a low-carbon perspective. Based on the land use data of Gansu Province in 2000, 2010, and 2020, we measured the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of the PLES. The PLUS model was used to simulate the PLES in 2030 and 2060 under the three scenarios of natural evolution, economic development, and ecological priority, and the InVEST model was used to calculate its carbon storage. The results show that: ① The ecological space occupied the largest proportion and had the widest distribution. The living space occupied the smallest proportion, showing a scattered distribution, with more in the south than in the north. The production space was mostly distributed near the living space. The transformation of PLES was more drastic, mainly the transformation between \"forest-field-grass-sand\". ② The spatial distribution of PLES in the three scenarios in 2030 and 2060 was basically similar to that in the historical period. Ecological space decreased under the natural evolution and economic development scenarios and increased under the ecological protection scenarios. ③ From 2000 to 2020, carbon stocks showed a \"U\" trend of first decreasing and then increasing in time. The change of carbon storage in both the natural evolution and economic development scenarios showed a \"U\" trend of first decreasing and then increasing, while the carbon storage in the ecological protection scenarios showed a continuous increasing trend, and the carbon storage was the highest among the three scenarios. ④ The high-value and hot-spot areas of carbon storage were concentrated in the Qilian Mountains, Gannan Plateau, and Longnan Mountains, while the low-value and cold-spot areas were mainly distributed in the desert and Gobi areas of the Hexi Corridor. In all three scenarios, the spatial distribution of carbon stocks in 2060 was more balanced than that in 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 6","pages":"3806-3817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202406166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gansu Province is an important ecological security barrier and ecological transition zone in the Chinese ecological security pattern. The study of its production-living-ecological space (PLES) transformation and its carbon storage effect is of great significance for realizing space optimization and regional sustainable development from a low-carbon perspective. Based on the land use data of Gansu Province in 2000, 2010, and 2020, we measured the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics of the PLES. The PLUS model was used to simulate the PLES in 2030 and 2060 under the three scenarios of natural evolution, economic development, and ecological priority, and the InVEST model was used to calculate its carbon storage. The results show that: ① The ecological space occupied the largest proportion and had the widest distribution. The living space occupied the smallest proportion, showing a scattered distribution, with more in the south than in the north. The production space was mostly distributed near the living space. The transformation of PLES was more drastic, mainly the transformation between "forest-field-grass-sand". ② The spatial distribution of PLES in the three scenarios in 2030 and 2060 was basically similar to that in the historical period. Ecological space decreased under the natural evolution and economic development scenarios and increased under the ecological protection scenarios. ③ From 2000 to 2020, carbon stocks showed a "U" trend of first decreasing and then increasing in time. The change of carbon storage in both the natural evolution and economic development scenarios showed a "U" trend of first decreasing and then increasing, while the carbon storage in the ecological protection scenarios showed a continuous increasing trend, and the carbon storage was the highest among the three scenarios. ④ The high-value and hot-spot areas of carbon storage were concentrated in the Qilian Mountains, Gannan Plateau, and Longnan Mountains, while the low-value and cold-spot areas were mainly distributed in the desert and Gobi areas of the Hexi Corridor. In all three scenarios, the spatial distribution of carbon stocks in 2060 was more balanced than that in 2020.

生态过渡带生产-生活-生态空间多情景模拟及碳储量评价——以甘肃省为例[j]。
甘肃省是中国生态安全格局中重要的生态安全屏障和生态过渡带。研究其生产-生活-生态空间转化及其碳储存效应,对于实现低碳视角下的空间优化和区域可持续发展具有重要意义。以2000年、2010年和2020年甘肃省土地利用数据为基础,对其时空演变特征进行了测度。利用PLUS模型模拟了2030年和2060年自然演化、经济发展和生态优先三种情景下的生态系统,并利用InVEST模型计算了生态系统的碳储量。结果表明:①生态空间占比最大,分布最广;居住空间所占比例最小,呈分散分布,南部比北部多。生产空间多分布在生活空间附近。生态系统的转变更为剧烈,主要表现为“林-田-草-沙”的转变。②2030年和2060年三种情景下的生态承载力空间分布与历史时期基本相似。生态空间在自然演化和经济发展情景下呈减少趋势,在生态保护情景下呈增加趋势。③2000 ~ 2020年碳储量在时间上呈先减少后增加的“U”型趋势。自然演化情景和经济发展情景的碳储量变化均呈现先减少后增加的“U”型趋势,而生态保护情景的碳储量则呈现持续增加的趋势,且碳储量在3个情景中最高。④碳储量高值区和热点区集中在祁连山、甘南高原和陇南山区,低值区和冷点区主要分布在河西走廊的荒漠和戈壁地区。在三种情景下,2060年碳储量的空间分布比2020年更加平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信