Zero Waste: Consumers' Perception of the Use of Eco-friendly Toothpaste Tablets-A Quasi-experimental Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Jasmine Sandhu, Brittany Calderon, Bumsoo Park, Jixa Patel, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Udochukwu Oyoyo, So Ran Kwon
{"title":"Zero Waste: Consumers' Perception of the Use of Eco-friendly Toothpaste Tablets-A Quasi-experimental Study.","authors":"Jasmine Sandhu, Brittany Calderon, Bumsoo Park, Jixa Patel, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Udochukwu Oyoyo, So Ran Kwon","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate consumers' perception of the use of eco-friendly toothpaste tablets and evaluate whether there would be a perception difference by consumer demographics: Gender and age.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 152) received one packet of toothpaste tablets (Denttabs GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Participants were instructed to brush using toothpaste tablets twice daily. At the end of the 1-week period, participants completed a 10-item questionnaire on their satisfaction of the use of toothpaste tablets. Pearson's Chi-squared test was used to test the distribution of positive and negative responses by gender and by age. Tests of hypotheses were two-sided with α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority responded favorably to cleanliness after usage, flavor, ease of use, importance of eco-friendliness of toothpaste products, intention to switch to tablets, and overall satisfaction with the texture. However, 59.9% of participants disliked the texture of tablets. Based on Pearson's Chi-squared test, there were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of positive and negative responses by gender except for flavor (<i>p</i> = 0.013), where more males responded negatively (27.4 vs 11.5%). Participants were further categorized by age and respective generation (<i>n</i> = 38/age generation type). There were no significant differences in the distribution of positive and negative responses by age generation except for flavor (<i>p</i> = 0.023) and potential switch to toothpaste tablets (<i>p</i> = 0.030). For both items, millennials showed a greater proportion of negative responses than the other generations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Toothpaste tablets offer an effective and eco-friendly alternative to traditional toothpaste. While patients generally view them positively, texture remains a major factor influencing acceptance.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Consumer responses indicate a positive perception of toothpaste tablets, supporting their potential as a sustainable alternative to conventional dentifrices. Clinicians should highlight both the environmental benefits and the sensory differences when recommending toothpaste tablets to support patient adoption and align with growing sustainability trends. How to cite this article: Sandhu J, Calderon B, Park B, <i>et al.</i> Zero Waste: Consumers' Perception of the Use of Eco-friendly Toothpaste Tablets- A Quasi-experimental Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(4):333-338.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 4","pages":"333-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of the study was to evaluate consumers' perception of the use of eco-friendly toothpaste tablets and evaluate whether there would be a perception difference by consumer demographics: Gender and age.

Materials and methods: Participants (N = 152) received one packet of toothpaste tablets (Denttabs GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Participants were instructed to brush using toothpaste tablets twice daily. At the end of the 1-week period, participants completed a 10-item questionnaire on their satisfaction of the use of toothpaste tablets. Pearson's Chi-squared test was used to test the distribution of positive and negative responses by gender and by age. Tests of hypotheses were two-sided with α = 0.05.

Results: The majority responded favorably to cleanliness after usage, flavor, ease of use, importance of eco-friendliness of toothpaste products, intention to switch to tablets, and overall satisfaction with the texture. However, 59.9% of participants disliked the texture of tablets. Based on Pearson's Chi-squared test, there were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of positive and negative responses by gender except for flavor (p = 0.013), where more males responded negatively (27.4 vs 11.5%). Participants were further categorized by age and respective generation (n = 38/age generation type). There were no significant differences in the distribution of positive and negative responses by age generation except for flavor (p = 0.023) and potential switch to toothpaste tablets (p = 0.030). For both items, millennials showed a greater proportion of negative responses than the other generations.

Conclusions: Toothpaste tablets offer an effective and eco-friendly alternative to traditional toothpaste. While patients generally view them positively, texture remains a major factor influencing acceptance.

Clinical significance: Consumer responses indicate a positive perception of toothpaste tablets, supporting their potential as a sustainable alternative to conventional dentifrices. Clinicians should highlight both the environmental benefits and the sensory differences when recommending toothpaste tablets to support patient adoption and align with growing sustainability trends. How to cite this article: Sandhu J, Calderon B, Park B, et al. Zero Waste: Consumers' Perception of the Use of Eco-friendly Toothpaste Tablets- A Quasi-experimental Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(4):333-338.

零浪费:消费者对环保牙膏片使用的认知——准实验研究
目的:本研究的目的是评估消费者对使用环保牙膏片的看法,并评估消费者人口统计数据:性别和年龄是否会产生感知差异。材料和方法:参与者(N = 152)收到一包牙膏片(Denttabs GmbH, Berlin, Germany)。参与者被要求每天用牙膏片刷牙两次。在一周结束时,参与者完成了一份关于他们对牙膏片使用满意度的10项问卷调查。采用皮尔逊卡方检验对性别和年龄的阳性和阴性反应分布进行检验。假设检验采用双侧检验,α = 0.05。结果:大多数人对使用后的清洁度、口味、易用性、牙膏产品的生态友好性的重要性、转向片剂的意向和整体质地满意。然而,59.9%的参与者不喜欢平板电脑的质地。根据皮尔逊卡方检验,除了口味(p = 0.013)之外,性别之间的积极和消极反应分布没有统计学意义上的差异,其中男性的消极反应更多(27.4%比11.5%)。参与者进一步按年龄和各自的世代分类(n = 38/年龄世代类型)。除了口味(p = 0.023)和可能转向牙膏片(p = 0.030)外,不同年龄段的积极和消极反应分布没有显著差异。对于这两个问题,千禧一代的负面回答比例都高于其他几代人。结论:牙膏片是传统牙膏的一种有效且环保的替代品。虽然患者普遍认为它们是积极的,但质地仍然是影响接受度的主要因素。临床意义:消费者的反应表明了对牙膏片的积极看法,支持它们作为传统牙膏的可持续替代品的潜力。临床医生在推荐牙膏片剂时应强调环境效益和感官差异,以支持患者采用,并与日益增长的可持续性趋势保持一致。本文引用方式:Sandhu J, Calderon B, Park B,等。零浪费:消费者对环保牙膏片使用的认知——一项准实验研究。[J] .现代医学学报,2015;26(4):333-338。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信