Contemporary results of En Bloc holep for large prostates.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alexandre Iscaife, Moises Rodríguez Socarrás, Thalita Bento Talizin, Willian Carlos Nahas, Julio Fernandez Del Alamo, Vanesa Cuadros Rivera, Fernando Gómez Sancha, Moisés Rodríguez Socarrás
{"title":"Contemporary results of En Bloc holep for large prostates.","authors":"Alexandre Iscaife, Moises Rodríguez Socarrás, Thalita Bento Talizin, Willian Carlos Nahas, Julio Fernandez Del Alamo, Vanesa Cuadros Rivera, Fernando Gómez Sancha, Moisés Rodríguez Socarrás","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05765-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare patients undergoing En Bloc HoLEP with early apical release and sphincter preservation, accordingly to prostate size regarding perioperative data and postoperative evolution.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>754 patients were studied and divided into 2 groups: prostate ≤ 120 g (644 patients) and prostate ≥ 120 g, (110 patients). Surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (Fernando Gómez Sancha) using a 150 W high power Holmium laser (Quanta SpA, Samarate, Italy), The technique was En-Bloc with early apical release and sphincter preservation. Prostate volume, PSA, Q max, IPSS among other parameters were assessed before surgery and 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Urinary incontinence (UI) was defined as any leakage reported by patients; classified by duration (< 1 month, 1-3 months, and > 3 months) and type (urge, stress, or mixed).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 67.2 years 67.2 years (± 8,4). Enucleation time was longer in the larger prostate group (40.0 vs. 25.0 min, p < 0.0001), as well as morcellation time (13.0 vs. 5.0 min, p < 0.0001). Enucleation (3.1 vs. 1.9 g/min, p < 0.0001) and morcellation efficiency (7.7 vs. 1.5 g/min, p = 0.0015) were higher in the large prostate group. At 6 months the incidence of STUI was extremely low without difference between groups (0.9% vs. 0.15%, p = 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the study shows that the En-Bloc technique with early release and sphincter preservation has excellent continence results and low complication rates even for prostates larger than 120 g. Technical refinement and care with apical enucleation should be one of the fundamental axes of the training and development of surgeons in performing HoLEP, especially in large prostates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05765-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The aim of this study was to compare patients undergoing En Bloc HoLEP with early apical release and sphincter preservation, accordingly to prostate size regarding perioperative data and postoperative evolution.

Materials and methods: 754 patients were studied and divided into 2 groups: prostate ≤ 120 g (644 patients) and prostate ≥ 120 g, (110 patients). Surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (Fernando Gómez Sancha) using a 150 W high power Holmium laser (Quanta SpA, Samarate, Italy), The technique was En-Bloc with early apical release and sphincter preservation. Prostate volume, PSA, Q max, IPSS among other parameters were assessed before surgery and 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Urinary incontinence (UI) was defined as any leakage reported by patients; classified by duration (< 1 month, 1-3 months, and > 3 months) and type (urge, stress, or mixed).

Results: The mean age was 67.2 years 67.2 years (± 8,4). Enucleation time was longer in the larger prostate group (40.0 vs. 25.0 min, p < 0.0001), as well as morcellation time (13.0 vs. 5.0 min, p < 0.0001). Enucleation (3.1 vs. 1.9 g/min, p < 0.0001) and morcellation efficiency (7.7 vs. 1.5 g/min, p = 0.0015) were higher in the large prostate group. At 6 months the incidence of STUI was extremely low without difference between groups (0.9% vs. 0.15%, p = 0.27).

Conclusion: In conclusion, the study shows that the En-Bloc technique with early release and sphincter preservation has excellent continence results and low complication rates even for prostates larger than 120 g. Technical refinement and care with apical enucleation should be one of the fundamental axes of the training and development of surgeons in performing HoLEP, especially in large prostates.

En Bloc治疗大前列腺的当代结果。
背景和目的:本研究的目的是比较En Bloc HoLEP患者的围手术期数据和术后发展情况,根据前列腺大小进行早期根尖释放和括约肌保留。材料与方法:将754例患者分为前列腺≤120g组(644例)和前列腺≥120g组(110例)。手术由一名外科医生(Fernando Gómez Sancha)使用150 W高功率钬激光(Quanta SpA, Samarate, Italy)进行,该技术为En-Bloc,早期根尖释放和保留括约肌。术前、术后3、6、12个月分别评估前列腺体积、PSA、Q max、IPSS等参数。尿失禁(UI)定义为患者报告的任何渗漏;按持续时间(3个月)和类型(急迫、紧张或混合)分类。结果:平均年龄67.2岁,67.2岁(±8.4岁)。大前列腺组的去核时间较长(40.0 min vs. 25.0 min, p)。结论:本研究表明,En-Bloc技术早期释放并保留括约肌,即使对于大于120g的前列腺,其尿失禁效果也很好,并发症发生率低。根尖去核的技术改进和护理应该是外科医生进行HoLEP手术的培训和发展的基本轴之一,特别是在大前列腺手术中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信