Ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hao Xu, Jiao-Ran Liu, Bo-Jian Gao, Long Peng, Zhi-Qin Han, Rong-Xin Zhang
{"title":"Ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.","authors":"Hao Xu, Jiao-Ran Liu, Bo-Jian Gao, Long Peng, Zhi-Qin Han, Rong-Xin Zhang","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative distinguishing between benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) poses a challenge. Ultrasound elastography has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool; however, further investigation is needed to assess its diagnostic accuracy in evaluating GISTs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound elastography for differentiating between benign and malignant GISTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 110 patients with 103 histopathologically confirmed GISTs between January 2021 and December 2023. All tumors underwent conventional ultrasound examination, strain elastography (SE), and shear-wave elastography (SWE) before surgical resection. The study evaluated elastographic parameters such as strain ratio, elastographic patterns, mean elastic modulus, and heterogeneity index. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with histopathological diagnosis as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 103 GISTs, 45 (43.7%) were benign and 58 (56.3%) were malignant based on modified National Institutes of Health criteria. Malignant GISTs exhibited significantly higher strain ratios (4.82 ± 1.73 <i>vs</i> 2.31 ± 0.89; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and mean elastic modulus values (45.6 ± 15.8 kPa <i>vs</i> 21.3 ± 8.4 kPa; <i>P</i> < 0.001) than benign tumors. The optimal cutoff values were 3.45 for the strain ratio (sensitivity: 84.5%, specificity: 86.7%) and 32.5 kPa for the mean elastic modulus (sensitivity: 87.9%, specificity: 88.9%). The areas under the curve were 0.892 and 0.918, respectively. Interobserver agreement was excellent for both SE [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.88] and SWE (ICC range: 0.85-0.93) measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound elastography shows high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between benign and malignant GISTs. Combining SE and SWE provides complementary parameters for preoperative risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 6","pages":"103674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.103674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preoperative distinguishing between benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) poses a challenge. Ultrasound elastography has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool; however, further investigation is needed to assess its diagnostic accuracy in evaluating GISTs.

Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound elastography for differentiating between benign and malignant GISTs.

Methods: This prospective study included 110 patients with 103 histopathologically confirmed GISTs between January 2021 and December 2023. All tumors underwent conventional ultrasound examination, strain elastography (SE), and shear-wave elastography (SWE) before surgical resection. The study evaluated elastographic parameters such as strain ratio, elastographic patterns, mean elastic modulus, and heterogeneity index. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with histopathological diagnosis as the reference standard.

Results: Of the 103 GISTs, 45 (43.7%) were benign and 58 (56.3%) were malignant based on modified National Institutes of Health criteria. Malignant GISTs exhibited significantly higher strain ratios (4.82 ± 1.73 vs 2.31 ± 0.89; P < 0.001) and mean elastic modulus values (45.6 ± 15.8 kPa vs 21.3 ± 8.4 kPa; P < 0.001) than benign tumors. The optimal cutoff values were 3.45 for the strain ratio (sensitivity: 84.5%, specificity: 86.7%) and 32.5 kPa for the mean elastic modulus (sensitivity: 87.9%, specificity: 88.9%). The areas under the curve were 0.892 and 0.918, respectively. Interobserver agreement was excellent for both SE [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.88] and SWE (ICC range: 0.85-0.93) measurements.

Conclusion: Ultrasound elastography shows high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between benign and malignant GISTs. Combining SE and SWE provides complementary parameters for preoperative risk stratification.

超声弹性成像在胃肠道良恶性间质瘤鉴别诊断中的应用。
背景:术前鉴别胃肠道间质瘤(gist)的良恶性是一个挑战。超声弹性成像已成为一种很有前途的诊断工具;但其在评估gist诊断中的准确性有待进一步研究。目的:评价超声弹性成像对胃肠道间质瘤良恶性鉴别的准确性。方法:本前瞻性研究纳入了2021年1月至2023年12月期间110例经组织病理学证实的103例gist患者。所有肿瘤术前均行常规超声检查、应变弹性成像(SE)和剪切波弹性成像(SWE)检查。该研究评估了弹性参数,如应变比、弹性模式、平均弹性模量和非均质性指数。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析评价诊断效能,以组织病理学诊断为参考标准。结果:103例gist中,45例(43.7%)为良性,58例(56.3%)为恶性。恶性gist表现出更高的应变比(4.82±1.73 vs 2.31±0.89);P < 0.001)和平均弹性模量值(45.6±15.8 kPa vs 21.3±8.4 kPa;P < 0.001)高于良性肿瘤。应变比的最佳截止值为3.45(灵敏度为84.5%,特异度为86.7%),平均弹性模量的最佳截止值为32.5 kPa(灵敏度为87.9%,特异度为88.9%)。曲线下面积分别为0.892和0.918。在SE[类内相关系数(ICC) = 0.88]和SWE (ICC范围:0.85-0.93)测量中,观察者间的一致性都很好。结论:超声弹性成像对胃肠道间质瘤良恶性鉴别具有较高的诊断准确性。结合SE和SWE为术前风险分层提供了补充参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信