Quality of care combined with mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention in patients undergoing arterial interventional embolization for liver tumors.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yi Lu, Ming-Yang Xu, Li Lu, Zhi-Wei Gu, Ai-Qin Yin, Yin-Feng Yin
{"title":"Quality of care combined with mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention in patients undergoing arterial interventional embolization for liver tumors.","authors":"Yi Lu, Ming-Yang Xu, Li Lu, Zhi-Wei Gu, Ai-Qin Yin, Yin-Feng Yin","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.105826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective treatment for liver cancer, clinical practice has shown that many patients experience significant psychological distress following the procedure, which can hinder postoperative recovery and prognosis. Therefore, effective and evidence-based interventions are urgently needed to address this issue.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of nursing quality-sensitive indicators combined with mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) interventions in patients undergoing TACE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 84 patients who underwent TACE from June 2022 to March 2024 were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the observation group (<i>n</i> = 42), which received nursing quality-sensitive indicator-based care combined with MBSR intervention, or the control group (<i>n</i> = 42), which received routine care combined with MBSR intervention. Psychological stress response levels [assessed using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS)], coping strategies [measured with the Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS)], quality of care [evaluated using the Perceived Nursing Service Quality (PNSQ) scale], and overall patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 4 weeks, the observation group demonstrated significantly higher TMMS scores, as well as increased optimism, support-seeking, bravery, PNSQ scores, and satisfaction (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In contrast, scores for self-dependence, conservatism, resignation, and avoidance in the JCS were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of nursing quality-sensitive indicators and MBSR intervention in TACE patients not only reduces psychological stress and encourages a more positive attitude toward illness but also enhances nursing quality and improves the overall patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 6","pages":"105826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.105826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective treatment for liver cancer, clinical practice has shown that many patients experience significant psychological distress following the procedure, which can hinder postoperative recovery and prognosis. Therefore, effective and evidence-based interventions are urgently needed to address this issue.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of nursing quality-sensitive indicators combined with mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) interventions in patients undergoing TACE.

Methods: A total of 84 patients who underwent TACE from June 2022 to March 2024 were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the observation group (n = 42), which received nursing quality-sensitive indicator-based care combined with MBSR intervention, or the control group (n = 42), which received routine care combined with MBSR intervention. Psychological stress response levels [assessed using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS)], coping strategies [measured with the Jalowiec Coping Scale (JCS)], quality of care [evaluated using the Perceived Nursing Service Quality (PNSQ) scale], and overall patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.

Results: After 4 weeks, the observation group demonstrated significantly higher TMMS scores, as well as increased optimism, support-seeking, bravery, PNSQ scores, and satisfaction (P < 0.05). In contrast, scores for self-dependence, conservatism, resignation, and avoidance in the JCS were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of nursing quality-sensitive indicators and MBSR intervention in TACE patients not only reduces psychological stress and encourages a more positive attitude toward illness but also enhances nursing quality and improves the overall patient experience.

肝肿瘤动脉介入栓塞患者的护理质量与正念减压干预相结合。
背景:虽然经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)是肝癌的一种有效治疗方法,但临床实践表明,许多患者在手术后会出现明显的心理困扰,这可能会影响术后恢复和预后。因此,迫切需要有效和基于证据的干预措施来解决这一问题。目的:评价护理质量敏感指标结合正念减压(MBSR)干预对TACE患者的影响。方法:共84例于2022年6月至2024年3月接受TACE治疗的患者入组研究。随机分为观察组(n = 42)和对照组(n = 42),观察组采用护理质量敏感指标护理结合正念减压疗法干预;对照组采用常规护理结合正念减压疗法干预。比较两组患者的心理应激反应水平[采用特质元情绪量表(TMMS)评估]、应对策略[采用Jalowiec应对量表(JCS)测量]、护理质量[采用感知护理服务质量量表(PNSQ)评估]和总体患者满意度。结果:观察组患者治疗4周后TMMS评分显著提高,乐观、寻求支持、勇敢、PNSQ评分、满意度均显著提高(P < 0.05)。观察组患者在JCS中的自立、保守、顺从、回避得分显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:护理质量敏感指标与正念减压干预相结合对TACE患者不仅能减轻患者的心理压力,鼓励患者更加积极的疾病态度,还能提高护理质量,改善患者的整体体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信