{"title":"Differences between behavioral time budget and welfare indicators in two different slow-growing broiler genotypes kept in the free-range system.","authors":"Arda Sözcü, Aydın İpek, Stefan Gunnarsson","doi":"10.1007/s11259-025-10814-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The consumer interest for meat from slow growing broilers in free-range system has increased recently. Therefore, the need for knowledge about behaviour and welfare of birds in these systems has increased. The aim of this study was to compare the differences between behavioral time budget, tonic immobility and clinical welfare indicators in two slow growing broiler genotypes (Hubbard ISA Red JA-57 and Sasso XL44 × SA51A) kept in a free-range system. In total, 480 one-day old chicks were reared, and the birds were regularly scored for behavioral time budget and multiple welfare indicators. The eating and drinking tended to decrease in Sasso birds, whereas they showed an increment in Hubbard birds with increasing of age (P < 0.01). Hubbard birds had the highest percentage of explorative pecking (7.65%) of the total time budget compared to the Sasso birds (4.33% at day 63, P < 0.01). Comb pecking wounds, skin injuries and gait scores were affected by both genotype and age (P < 0.01). The duration of tonic immobility was found to be longer, as well as the number of tonic immobility inductions was higher in Sasso birds compared to the Hubbard (26.49 vs. 19.68 s; 1.54 and 1.24, respectively P < 0.01). These findings indicate that birds of the Hubbard genotype may be more prone to comb pecking and skin injuries, but they showed less fearful and higher walking ability, compared to Sasso birds.</p>","PeriodicalId":23690,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Research Communications","volume":"49 4","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-025-10814-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The consumer interest for meat from slow growing broilers in free-range system has increased recently. Therefore, the need for knowledge about behaviour and welfare of birds in these systems has increased. The aim of this study was to compare the differences between behavioral time budget, tonic immobility and clinical welfare indicators in two slow growing broiler genotypes (Hubbard ISA Red JA-57 and Sasso XL44 × SA51A) kept in a free-range system. In total, 480 one-day old chicks were reared, and the birds were regularly scored for behavioral time budget and multiple welfare indicators. The eating and drinking tended to decrease in Sasso birds, whereas they showed an increment in Hubbard birds with increasing of age (P < 0.01). Hubbard birds had the highest percentage of explorative pecking (7.65%) of the total time budget compared to the Sasso birds (4.33% at day 63, P < 0.01). Comb pecking wounds, skin injuries and gait scores were affected by both genotype and age (P < 0.01). The duration of tonic immobility was found to be longer, as well as the number of tonic immobility inductions was higher in Sasso birds compared to the Hubbard (26.49 vs. 19.68 s; 1.54 and 1.24, respectively P < 0.01). These findings indicate that birds of the Hubbard genotype may be more prone to comb pecking and skin injuries, but they showed less fearful and higher walking ability, compared to Sasso birds.
消费者对自由放养系统中生长缓慢的肉鸡肉的兴趣最近有所增加。因此,对这些系统中鸟类的行为和福利的知识的需求增加了。本研究旨在比较两种慢生长肉鸡基因型(Hubbard ISA Red JA-57和Sasso XL44 × SA51A)散养系统中行为时间预算、强直不动和临床福利指标的差异。共饲养480只1日龄雏鸡,定期对雏鸡进行行为时间预算和多项福利指标评分。随着年龄的增长,沙索鸟的食、饮水量呈下降趋势,而哈伯德鸟的食、饮水量呈增加趋势(P . 1)
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Research Communications publishes fully refereed research articles and topical reviews on all aspects of the veterinary sciences. Interdisciplinary articles are particularly encouraged, as are well argued reviews, even if they are somewhat controversial.
The journal is an appropriate medium in which to publish new methods, newly described diseases and new pathological findings, as these are applied to animals. The material should be of international rather than local interest. As it deliberately seeks a wide coverage, Veterinary Research Communications provides its readers with a means of keeping abreast of current developments in the entire field of veterinary science.