Biomarker-based evaluation of aflatoxin B1 exposure in cattle.

IF 2 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Veterinary World Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-25 DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2025.1297-1305
Priyadharshini Ponnusamy, Umaya Suganthi Rajendran, Madhavan Gopalakrishnan Nair, Uma Sambath, Raja Kumar, Jacob Thanislass, Avinash Warundeo Lakkawar, Vijayalakshmi Padmanaban, Poobitha Subbarayan
{"title":"Biomarker-based evaluation of aflatoxin B1 exposure in cattle.","authors":"Priyadharshini Ponnusamy, Umaya Suganthi Rajendran, Madhavan Gopalakrishnan Nair, Uma Sambath, Raja Kumar, Jacob Thanislass, Avinash Warundeo Lakkawar, Vijayalakshmi Padmanaban, Poobitha Subbarayan","doi":"10.14202/vetworld.2025.1297-1305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Assessment of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) exposure in cattle traditionally relies on feed analysis, which may not reflect chronic exposure or accurately indicate individual susceptibility. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of serum AFB1-albumin adducts and blood AFB1-DNA adducts as biomarkers for assessing individual chronic AFB1 exposure in cattle, irrespective of immediate feed contamination levels.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected from 53 crossbred cattle from farms, clinical veterinary cases, and slaughterhouses in Puducherry, India. Feed samples (n = 40) from farm and clinical cases were analyzed for aflatoxin contamination using two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography. AFB1 exposure was quantified by measuring serum AFB1-albumin adducts and blood AFB1-DNA adducts using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In addition, a novel method was developed to synthesize the aflatoxin B1-formamidopyrimidine (AFB1-FAPy) adduct <i>in vitro</i> and the synthesized adduct was characterized to serve as a standard for DNA adduct quantification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AFB1 was detected in 50% of feed samples, with 70% of positive samples exceeding the maximum permissible limit of 20 μg/kg. Despite variable feed contamination, serum AFB1-albumin and blood AFB1-DNA adducts were consistently detected across all animal categories. Median AFB1-albumin adduct levels were similar among farm (0.730 pg/mg), clinical (0.670 pg/mg), and slaughterhouse (0.770 pg/mg) cattle (p = 0.731). Median AFB1-DNA adduct levels were highest in slaughterhouse cattle (18.33 pmol/μg DNA), followed by farm (14.76 pmol/μg DNA) and clinical cases (7.47 pmol/μg DNA), although differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.328). No significant correlation was observed between feed contamination levels and biomarker concentrations, highlighting the chronic nature of AFB1 exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The consistent detection of AFB1-albumin and AFB1-DNA adducts in cattle, irrespective of detectable aflatoxin levels in feed, underscores the limitations of traditional feed analysis for monitoring chronic exposure. The novel synthesis and robust detection of AFB1-FAPy DNA adducts further enhance the reliability of these biomarkers. These biomarkers are minimally invasive, sensitive, and valuable for chronic aflatoxin exposure assessment, aiding proactive management strategies to safeguard animal health and public food safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":23587,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary World","volume":"18 5","pages":"1297-1305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.1297-1305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Assessment of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) exposure in cattle traditionally relies on feed analysis, which may not reflect chronic exposure or accurately indicate individual susceptibility. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of serum AFB1-albumin adducts and blood AFB1-DNA adducts as biomarkers for assessing individual chronic AFB1 exposure in cattle, irrespective of immediate feed contamination levels.

Materials and methods: Blood samples were collected from 53 crossbred cattle from farms, clinical veterinary cases, and slaughterhouses in Puducherry, India. Feed samples (n = 40) from farm and clinical cases were analyzed for aflatoxin contamination using two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography. AFB1 exposure was quantified by measuring serum AFB1-albumin adducts and blood AFB1-DNA adducts using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In addition, a novel method was developed to synthesize the aflatoxin B1-formamidopyrimidine (AFB1-FAPy) adduct in vitro and the synthesized adduct was characterized to serve as a standard for DNA adduct quantification.

Results: AFB1 was detected in 50% of feed samples, with 70% of positive samples exceeding the maximum permissible limit of 20 μg/kg. Despite variable feed contamination, serum AFB1-albumin and blood AFB1-DNA adducts were consistently detected across all animal categories. Median AFB1-albumin adduct levels were similar among farm (0.730 pg/mg), clinical (0.670 pg/mg), and slaughterhouse (0.770 pg/mg) cattle (p = 0.731). Median AFB1-DNA adduct levels were highest in slaughterhouse cattle (18.33 pmol/μg DNA), followed by farm (14.76 pmol/μg DNA) and clinical cases (7.47 pmol/μg DNA), although differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.328). No significant correlation was observed between feed contamination levels and biomarker concentrations, highlighting the chronic nature of AFB1 exposure.

Conclusion: The consistent detection of AFB1-albumin and AFB1-DNA adducts in cattle, irrespective of detectable aflatoxin levels in feed, underscores the limitations of traditional feed analysis for monitoring chronic exposure. The novel synthesis and robust detection of AFB1-FAPy DNA adducts further enhance the reliability of these biomarkers. These biomarkers are minimally invasive, sensitive, and valuable for chronic aflatoxin exposure assessment, aiding proactive management strategies to safeguard animal health and public food safety.

牛黄曲霉毒素B1暴露的生物标志物评价。
背景和目的:牛体内黄曲霉毒素B1 (AFB1)暴露的评估传统上依赖于饲料分析,这可能不能反映慢性暴露或准确地表明个体易感性。本研究旨在评估血清AFB1-白蛋白加合物和血液AFB1- dna加合物作为评估牛个体慢性AFB1暴露的生物标志物的效用,而不考虑直接饲料污染水平。材料与方法:从印度普杜切里的农场、临床兽医病例和屠宰场采集了53头杂交牛的血液样本。采用二维薄层色谱法对40份农场饲料和临床病例进行黄曲霉毒素污染分析。通过间接酶联免疫吸附法测定血清AFB1-白蛋白加合物和血液AFB1- dna加合物来定量AFB1暴露。此外,建立了体外合成黄曲霉毒素b1 -甲脒嘧啶(AFB1-FAPy)加合物的新方法,并对所合成的加合物进行了表征,可作为DNA加合物定量的标准物。结果:50%的饲料样品检出AFB1, 70%的阳性样品超过20 μg/kg的最大允许限量。尽管饲料污染程度不同,但在所有动物类别中均检测到血清afb1 -白蛋白和血液AFB1-DNA加合物。农场牛(0.730 pg/mg)、临床牛(0.670 pg/mg)和屠宰场牛(0.770 pg/mg)中位afb1 -白蛋白加合物水平相似(p = 0.731)。肉牛AFB1-DNA加合物中位数最高(18.33 pmol/μg DNA),其次是农场(14.76 pmol/μg DNA)和临床(7.47 pmol/μg DNA),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.328)。饲料污染水平与生物标志物浓度之间没有显著相关性,这突出了AFB1暴露的慢性性质。结论:无论饲料中黄曲霉毒素的检测水平如何,牛中afb1 -白蛋白和AFB1-DNA加合物的检测结果一致,这突显了传统饲料分析在监测慢性暴露方面的局限性。AFB1-FAPy DNA加合物的新合成和稳健检测进一步提高了这些生物标志物的可靠性。这些生物标志物对慢性黄曲霉毒素暴露评估具有微创性、敏感性和价值,有助于采取主动管理策略,保障动物健康和公共食品安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary World
Veterinary World Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
317
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary World publishes high quality papers focusing on Veterinary and Animal Science. The fields of study are bacteriology, parasitology, pathology, virology, immunology, mycology, public health, biotechnology, meat science, fish diseases, nutrition, gynecology, genetics, wildlife, laboratory animals, animal models of human infections, prion diseases and epidemiology. Studies on zoonotic and emerging infections are highly appreciated. Review articles are highly appreciated. All articles published by Veterinary World are made freely and permanently accessible online. All articles to Veterinary World are posted online immediately as they are ready for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信