Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Animals: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.9 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Medicine International Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/vmi/9921619
Daniel Uribe, Catalina López, Jorge U Carmona
{"title":"Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Disease in Animals: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Daniel Uribe, Catalina López, Jorge U Carmona","doi":"10.1155/vmi/9921619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used to treat ocular surface diseases (OSDs) in animals, including corneal ulcers and keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). However, existing studies lack rigorous evaluation of efficacy and safety. This systematic review assesses the quality, outcomes, and therapeutic benefits of PRP in veterinary ophthalmology. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review (January 2013-December 2023) of experimental and clinical studies in animals treated with PRP was conducted. From 126 records, 14 studies met inclusion criteria (rabbits, dogs). Outcomes included corneal healing, inflammation, and symptom relief. <b>Results:</b> PRP showed significant benefits: improved corneal healing (12/14 studies), reduced edema/vascularization (9/14 studies), and decreased pain/inflammation (5/14). However, a high risk of bias (10/14 studies), small sample sizes (median <i>n</i> = 20), and inconsistent PRP protocols (i.e., unreported platelet concentrations in 7/14 studies) limit conclusions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Despite promising results, PRP cannot yet be recommended as standard care due to methodological limitations. Future studies must standardize PRP preparation, such as centrifugation protocols, and platelet counts, prioritize randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and report adverse effects transparently.</p>","PeriodicalId":23503,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9921619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/vmi/9921619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used to treat ocular surface diseases (OSDs) in animals, including corneal ulcers and keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). However, existing studies lack rigorous evaluation of efficacy and safety. This systematic review assesses the quality, outcomes, and therapeutic benefits of PRP in veterinary ophthalmology. Methods: A systematic review (January 2013-December 2023) of experimental and clinical studies in animals treated with PRP was conducted. From 126 records, 14 studies met inclusion criteria (rabbits, dogs). Outcomes included corneal healing, inflammation, and symptom relief. Results: PRP showed significant benefits: improved corneal healing (12/14 studies), reduced edema/vascularization (9/14 studies), and decreased pain/inflammation (5/14). However, a high risk of bias (10/14 studies), small sample sizes (median n = 20), and inconsistent PRP protocols (i.e., unreported platelet concentrations in 7/14 studies) limit conclusions. Conclusions: Despite promising results, PRP cannot yet be recommended as standard care due to methodological limitations. Future studies must standardize PRP preparation, such as centrifugation protocols, and platelet counts, prioritize randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and report adverse effects transparently.

富血小板血浆治疗动物眼表疾病:系统综述
背景:富血小板血浆(PRP)越来越多地用于治疗动物眼表疾病(OSDs),包括角膜溃疡和干枯性角膜结膜炎(KCS)。然而,现有的研究缺乏对其有效性和安全性的严格评估。本系统综述评估了PRP在兽医眼科中的质量、结果和治疗效益。方法:系统回顾2013年1月- 2023年12月PRP治疗动物的实验和临床研究。从126份记录中,14项研究符合纳入标准(兔子、狗)。结果包括角膜愈合、炎症和症状缓解。结果:PRP显示出显著的益处:改善角膜愈合(12/14项研究),减少水肿/血管化(9/14项研究),减轻疼痛/炎症(5/14)。然而,高偏倚风险(10/14项研究)、小样本量(中位数n = 20)和不一致的PRP方案(即7/14项研究中未报告血小板浓度)限制了结论。结论:尽管有很好的结果,但由于方法学的局限性,PRP还不能作为标准治疗推荐。未来的研究必须标准化PRP的制备,如离心方案和血小板计数,优先考虑随机对照试验(rct),并透明地报告不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine International
Veterinary Medicine International Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles and review articles in all areas of veterinary research. The journal will consider articles on the biological basis of disease, as well as diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信