Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative care of infants and children with Hirschsprung disease.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mi-Yan Wang, Xiao-Hong Chen, Xiao-Chun He, Zhou-Jian Yang, Yu-Wei Yang, Jian Yang, Hui-Lin He
{"title":"Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative care of infants and children with Hirschsprung disease.","authors":"Mi-Yan Wang, Xiao-Hong Chen, Xiao-Chun He, Zhou-Jian Yang, Yu-Wei Yang, Jian Yang, Hui-Lin He","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.105739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) represents an innovative, protocol-driven perioperative care program designed to optimize patient outcomes. However, its application and efficacy in infants and children with Hirschsprung disease (HD) remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To delve into the impact of ERAS on perioperative recovery and the overall medical experience in HD infants and children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight infants and children with HD who received the Soave surgical procedure were enrolled in this case-control study. According to age- and sex-stratified single-blind randomized tables, 20 cases received ERAS treatment (ERAS group) and 18 cases received conventional treatment (control group). The two treatments were then compared in terms of perioperative recovery and medical experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in pain scores at awakening (4.2 ± 1.3 <i>vs</i> 5.2 ± 1.2, <i>t</i> = 2.516, <i>P</i> = 0.017) and pain duration (85.69 ± 7.46 hours <i>vs</i> 67.00 ± 8.56 hours, <i>t</i> = 7.139, <i>P</i> < 0.001) between the ERAS and control group. The recovery of bowel movement was earlier in the ERAS group than in the control group (borborygmus time: 33.63 ± 9.83 hours <i>vs</i> 44.69 ± 16.85 hours, <i>t</i> = 2.501, <i>P</i> = 0.017; feeding time: 36.63 ± 9.55 hours <i>vs</i> 49.36 ± 16.99 hours, <i>t</i> = 2.884, <i>P</i> = 0.007; anal catheter indwelling time: 75.83 ± 13.80 hours <i>vs</i> 93.36 ± 20.65 hours, <i>t</i> = 3.104, <i>P</i> = 0.004), and fever duration (40.73 ± 14.42 hours <i>vs</i> 52.63 ± 18.69 hours, <i>t</i> = 2.211, <i>P</i> = 0.034). In the ERAS group, hospital stay was shorter (7.5 ± 0.9 days <i>vs</i> 8.3 ± 1.2 days) and the cost was lower (14203 ± 2381 yuan <i>vs</i> 16847 ± 3558 yuan). During the 1-month follow-up period, of the multiple postoperative complications observed, the occurrence of perianal dermatitis (<i>P</i> <sub>Fisher</sub> = 0.016) and defecation dysfunction (<i>P</i> <sub>Fisher</sub> = 0.027) were lower in the ERAS group than in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ERAS protocol has the potential to profoundly enhance postoperative recovery and significantly elevate the overall comfort and quality of the medical experience, making it an indispensable approach that warrants widespread adoption. Continuous refinement through evidence-based practices is anticipated to further optimize its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 6","pages":"105739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.105739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) represents an innovative, protocol-driven perioperative care program designed to optimize patient outcomes. However, its application and efficacy in infants and children with Hirschsprung disease (HD) remain underexplored.

Aim: To delve into the impact of ERAS on perioperative recovery and the overall medical experience in HD infants and children.

Methods: Thirty-eight infants and children with HD who received the Soave surgical procedure were enrolled in this case-control study. According to age- and sex-stratified single-blind randomized tables, 20 cases received ERAS treatment (ERAS group) and 18 cases received conventional treatment (control group). The two treatments were then compared in terms of perioperative recovery and medical experience.

Results: Significant differences were observed in pain scores at awakening (4.2 ± 1.3 vs 5.2 ± 1.2, t = 2.516, P = 0.017) and pain duration (85.69 ± 7.46 hours vs 67.00 ± 8.56 hours, t = 7.139, P < 0.001) between the ERAS and control group. The recovery of bowel movement was earlier in the ERAS group than in the control group (borborygmus time: 33.63 ± 9.83 hours vs 44.69 ± 16.85 hours, t = 2.501, P = 0.017; feeding time: 36.63 ± 9.55 hours vs 49.36 ± 16.99 hours, t = 2.884, P = 0.007; anal catheter indwelling time: 75.83 ± 13.80 hours vs 93.36 ± 20.65 hours, t = 3.104, P = 0.004), and fever duration (40.73 ± 14.42 hours vs 52.63 ± 18.69 hours, t = 2.211, P = 0.034). In the ERAS group, hospital stay was shorter (7.5 ± 0.9 days vs 8.3 ± 1.2 days) and the cost was lower (14203 ± 2381 yuan vs 16847 ± 3558 yuan). During the 1-month follow-up period, of the multiple postoperative complications observed, the occurrence of perianal dermatitis (P Fisher = 0.016) and defecation dysfunction (P Fisher = 0.027) were lower in the ERAS group than in the control group.

Conclusion: The ERAS protocol has the potential to profoundly enhance postoperative recovery and significantly elevate the overall comfort and quality of the medical experience, making it an indispensable approach that warrants widespread adoption. Continuous refinement through evidence-based practices is anticipated to further optimize its efficacy.

提高术后恢复在婴幼儿先天性巨结肠围手术期护理中的应用。
背景:术后增强恢复(ERAS)是一种创新的、协议驱动的围手术期护理方案,旨在优化患者的预后。然而,其在婴儿和儿童先天性巨结肠疾病(HD)中的应用和疗效仍未得到充分探讨。目的:探讨ERAS对HD患儿围手术期康复及整体医疗体验的影响。方法:38例接受Soave手术的HD婴儿和儿童纳入本病例对照研究。根据年龄和性别分层的单盲随机表,ERAS治疗20例(ERAS组),常规治疗18例(对照组)。比较两种治疗方法的围手术期恢复情况和医疗经验。结果:ERAS组与对照组在觉醒时疼痛评分(4.2±1.3 vs 5.2±1.2,t = 2.516, P = 0.017)和疼痛持续时间(85.69±7.46 h vs 67.00±8.56 h, t = 7.139, P < 0.001)上存在显著差异。ERAS组肠蠕动恢复较对照组早(排便时间:33.63±9.83 h vs 44.69±16.85 h, t = 2.501, P = 0.017;饲喂时间:36.63±9.55 h vs 49.36±16.99 h, t = 2.884, P = 0.007;肛管留置时间:75.83±13.80小时vs 93.36±20.65小时,t = 3.104, P = 0.004),发热时间:40.73±14.42小时vs 52.63±18.69小时,t = 2.211, P = 0.034。ERAS组住院时间短(7.5±0.9 d vs 8.3±1.2 d),费用低(14203±2381元vs 16847±3558元)。随访1个月,在观察到的多种术后并发症中,ERAS组肛周皮炎(P Fisher = 0.016)和排便功能障碍(P Fisher = 0.027)的发生率低于对照组。结论:ERAS方案具有显著提高术后恢复的潜力,显著提高整体舒适度和医疗体验质量,是一种不可缺少的方法,值得广泛采用。通过循证实践的持续改进有望进一步优化其功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信