Intelligent pressure-controlled retrograde intrarenal surgery versus microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat 2-3 cm renal calculi.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Zhongsheng Yang, Qiliang Zhai, Junjing Wu, Leming Song, Yongming Huang, Ting Sun
{"title":"Intelligent pressure-controlled retrograde intrarenal surgery versus microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat 2-3 cm renal calculi.","authors":"Zhongsheng Yang, Qiliang Zhai, Junjing Wu, Leming Song, Yongming Huang, Ting Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01799-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a comparative analysis of intelligent pressure-controlled ureteroscopic lithotripsy (IRIRS) and intelligent pressure-controlled microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (IMPCNL) to treat 2-3 cm renal calculi. Patients (n = 140) with 2-3 cm renal calculi were randomly divided into the IRIRS and IMPCNL groups (n = 70/group). Surgical time, length of hospital stays, stone clearance rate, decrease in hemoglobin level, postoperative pain score, and incidence of complications were compared between groups. The IRIRS group had significantly longer operative durations than the IMPCNL group (average: 58.3 ± 7.4 vs. 52.5 ± 6.8 min). Stone clearance rates at 4 weeks postoperatively were 90.0% and 92.8% in the IRIRS and IMPCNL groups, respectively (P > 0.05). The IRIRS group had shorter hospital stays than the IMPCNL group (1.9 ± 0.3 vs. 3.2 ± 0.4 days). Intraoperative hemoglobin levels decreased more in the IMPCNL (1.03 ± 0.12 g/dL) than in the IRIRS (0.25 ± 0.06 g/dL, P < 0.001) group. Two and one cases in the IRIRS and IMPCNL group, respectively, experienced postoperative fever. The overall complication incidence did not significantly differ (12.9% IRIRS and 15.7% IMPCNL; P > 0.05). IRIRS and IMPCNL are safe, effective interventions for 2-3 cm renal calculi. Given its minimally invasive nature and positive operative safety outcomes, IRIRS has promising future applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01799-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We performed a comparative analysis of intelligent pressure-controlled ureteroscopic lithotripsy (IRIRS) and intelligent pressure-controlled microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy (IMPCNL) to treat 2-3 cm renal calculi. Patients (n = 140) with 2-3 cm renal calculi were randomly divided into the IRIRS and IMPCNL groups (n = 70/group). Surgical time, length of hospital stays, stone clearance rate, decrease in hemoglobin level, postoperative pain score, and incidence of complications were compared between groups. The IRIRS group had significantly longer operative durations than the IMPCNL group (average: 58.3 ± 7.4 vs. 52.5 ± 6.8 min). Stone clearance rates at 4 weeks postoperatively were 90.0% and 92.8% in the IRIRS and IMPCNL groups, respectively (P > 0.05). The IRIRS group had shorter hospital stays than the IMPCNL group (1.9 ± 0.3 vs. 3.2 ± 0.4 days). Intraoperative hemoglobin levels decreased more in the IMPCNL (1.03 ± 0.12 g/dL) than in the IRIRS (0.25 ± 0.06 g/dL, P < 0.001) group. Two and one cases in the IRIRS and IMPCNL group, respectively, experienced postoperative fever. The overall complication incidence did not significantly differ (12.9% IRIRS and 15.7% IMPCNL; P > 0.05). IRIRS and IMPCNL are safe, effective interventions for 2-3 cm renal calculi. Given its minimally invasive nature and positive operative safety outcomes, IRIRS has promising future applications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

智能压控逆行肾内手术与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗2- 3cm肾结石。
我们对智能压力控制输尿管镜碎石术(irrs)和智能压力控制微通道经皮肾镜取石术(IMPCNL)治疗2 ~ 3cm肾结石进行了比较分析。2-3 cm肾结石患者140例,随机分为irrs组和IMPCNL组(70例/组)。比较两组手术时间、住院时间、结石清除率、血红蛋白水平下降、术后疼痛评分、并发症发生率。irrs组的手术时间明显长于IMPCNL组(平均:58.3±7.4分钟比52.5±6.8分钟)。irrs组和IMPCNL组术后4周结石清除率分别为90.0%和92.8% (P < 0.05)。irrs组比IMPCNL组住院时间短(1.9±0.3天比3.2±0.4天)。IMPCNL组术中血红蛋白水平下降(1.03±0.12 g/dL)明显高于irrs组(0.25±0.06 g/dL, P < 0.05)。iris和IMPCNL是治疗2-3 cm肾结石安全有效的干预措施。鉴于其微创性和积极的手术安全性结果,IRIRS具有广阔的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信