Mónica Garrido, Tatiana Cruz Almeida, Ricardo Kuttner-Magalhães, Ricardo Marcos-Pinto, Sara Archer, Rolando Pinho, Maria Manuela Estevinho, João Santos-Antunes, Rui Morais, Pedro Barreiro, Inês Simão, Michael Bourke, Hunter Wang, Pedro Amaro, Elisa Gravito-Soares, Roman Kuvaev, Sergey Kashin, Miguel Areia, Maria Inês Viegas, Arjun D Koch, Manon C W Spaander, Nanda Provoost, Guido Manfredi, Gianluca Esposito, Giuseppe Losurdo, Arnaud Lemmers, Gloria Fernández-Esparrach, Enrique Rodriguez Santiago, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Diogo Libânio
{"title":"External multicenter validation of the FAMISH score for predicting metachronous gastric lesions after endoscopic submucosal dissection.","authors":"Mónica Garrido, Tatiana Cruz Almeida, Ricardo Kuttner-Magalhães, Ricardo Marcos-Pinto, Sara Archer, Rolando Pinho, Maria Manuela Estevinho, João Santos-Antunes, Rui Morais, Pedro Barreiro, Inês Simão, Michael Bourke, Hunter Wang, Pedro Amaro, Elisa Gravito-Soares, Roman Kuvaev, Sergey Kashin, Miguel Areia, Maria Inês Viegas, Arjun D Koch, Manon C W Spaander, Nanda Provoost, Guido Manfredi, Gianluca Esposito, Giuseppe Losurdo, Arnaud Lemmers, Gloria Fernández-Esparrach, Enrique Rodriguez Santiago, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Diogo Libânio","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2522464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Surveillance after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is crucial due to the high risk of metachronous gastric lesions (MGL), although this risk may differ between patients. We sought to validate the FAMISH score - a prediction score to estimate MGL risk after gastric ESD - within a multicentric framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Performance measures of the FAMISH score were assessed in a retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort, which included consecutive adult patients undergoing ESD for a primary gastric superficial lesion at 15 international centers, with a minimum endoscopic follow-up of at least 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 855 individuals were included, with 20% of them considered low-risk according to the FAMISH score. After a mean follow-up time of 5 years (SD ± 2 years), 168 patients (19.6%) developed MGL. At 3 years of follow-up, the score achieved 90.4% sensitivity and 93.9% NPV. At 5 years follow-up, the score achieved 89.1% sensitivity and 85.3% NPV. The FAMISH risk score achieved a fair diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.618 at 3 years (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 0.597 (<i>p</i> = 0.006) at 5 years of follow-up. The progression to MGL at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower for the low-risk group (9.6% vs. 18.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAMISH score achieved an acceptable diagnostic accuracy in a multicentric validation cohort from Western countries. This score is a useful tool to identify patients with low risk for MGL allowing to safely extend surveillance intervals and reduce the burden of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2522464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Surveillance after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is crucial due to the high risk of metachronous gastric lesions (MGL), although this risk may differ between patients. We sought to validate the FAMISH score - a prediction score to estimate MGL risk after gastric ESD - within a multicentric framework.
Materials and methods: Performance measures of the FAMISH score were assessed in a retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort, which included consecutive adult patients undergoing ESD for a primary gastric superficial lesion at 15 international centers, with a minimum endoscopic follow-up of at least 3 years.
Results: A total of 855 individuals were included, with 20% of them considered low-risk according to the FAMISH score. After a mean follow-up time of 5 years (SD ± 2 years), 168 patients (19.6%) developed MGL. At 3 years of follow-up, the score achieved 90.4% sensitivity and 93.9% NPV. At 5 years follow-up, the score achieved 89.1% sensitivity and 85.3% NPV. The FAMISH risk score achieved a fair diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.618 at 3 years (p < 0.001) and 0.597 (p = 0.006) at 5 years of follow-up. The progression to MGL at 5 years of follow-up was significantly lower for the low-risk group (9.6% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.029).
Conclusions: The FAMISH score achieved an acceptable diagnostic accuracy in a multicentric validation cohort from Western countries. This score is a useful tool to identify patients with low risk for MGL allowing to safely extend surveillance intervals and reduce the burden of care.
背景和目的:由于异时性胃病变(MGL)的高风险,胃内镜粘膜下剥离(ESD)后的监测至关重要,尽管这种风险在患者之间可能存在差异。我们试图在多中心框架内验证FAMISH评分-一种用于估计胃ESD后MGL风险的预测评分。材料和方法:FAMISH评分的性能指标通过一项多中心队列的回顾性分析进行评估,该队列包括在15个国际中心连续接受ESD治疗原发性胃浅表病变的成年患者,至少有3年的内镜随访。结果:共纳入855人,其中20%根据FAMISH评分被认为是低风险。平均随访5年(SD±2年),168例(19.6%)发生MGL。随访3年时,该评分达到90.4%的敏感性和93.9%的NPV。随访5年时,该评分达到89.1%的敏感性和85.3%的NPV。FAMISH风险评分达到了相当的诊断准确性,随访5年,3年时AUC为0.618 (p p = 0.006)。随访5年时,低风险组进展为MGL的比例明显较低(9.6% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.029)。结论:FAMISH评分在西方国家的多中心验证队列中获得了可接受的诊断准确性。该评分是识别MGL低风险患者的有用工具,允许安全地延长监测间隔并减轻护理负担。
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution