Long-term CBCT evaluation of bone volume stability post dental implant placement. 1 - Exploring sex as a risk factor.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
David Goteiner, Ryan Levy, Shuying Jang, Marc Goldman, Steven R Singer
{"title":"Long-term CBCT evaluation of bone volume stability post dental implant placement. 1 - Exploring sex as a risk factor.","authors":"David Goteiner, Ryan Levy, Shuying Jang, Marc Goldman, Steven R Singer","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6336017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective study assesses the long-term effects of implants on alveolar and basal bone to determine if a patient's sex affects dimensional changes in the jaw and evaluate whether dental implants halt the atrophy of bone when compared to no post-extraction intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>IRB approval was obtained for this study. Of the 125 patients (432 sites) in the study, 53% were female. All had two CBCTs taken, an average of 4.7 years apart. The scans were divided into three groups. In the control group, the extraction site (first CBCT or T1) was not replaced when the second scan was taken (T2). Group 2 had no implant at T1 and an implant at T2. Group 3 had an implant at T1 and T2. Measurements were made from landmarks at predetermined levels (superior cortex of the IAN or the most inferior point in the nasal floor (NF) in the direction of the crest of bone height (Group C, 2, and 3). To avoid osseous changes due to placement, measurements were made from the inferior alveolar nerve for mandibular implants or the nasal floor for maxillary implants. Recognizing gender-based disparities in jaw size, we monitored percentage changes in bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loss of alveolar bone width across all groups was common. When bivariate analysis was performed after Bonferroni correction (p<0.025), changes in alveolar bone width were significantly greater in females (p = 0.004). Although the loss in the basal bone was present, it was not significant between the sexes nor as great as alveolar bone resorption (p=0.880). When comparing groups using bivariate analysis, differences were not statistically significant between treatment groups and the control group (p=0.050) for basal bone and for alveolar bone (p=0.052). In the regression analysis for sex or groups, neither was statistically significant for either basal or alveolar bone (p >0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dental implants do not arrest post-extraction atrophy in either alveolar or basal bone. Females exhibited a statistically greater rate of alveolar bone loss. Stable long-term implant success necessitates precise placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6336017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This retrospective study assesses the long-term effects of implants on alveolar and basal bone to determine if a patient's sex affects dimensional changes in the jaw and evaluate whether dental implants halt the atrophy of bone when compared to no post-extraction intervention.

Methods and materials: IRB approval was obtained for this study. Of the 125 patients (432 sites) in the study, 53% were female. All had two CBCTs taken, an average of 4.7 years apart. The scans were divided into three groups. In the control group, the extraction site (first CBCT or T1) was not replaced when the second scan was taken (T2). Group 2 had no implant at T1 and an implant at T2. Group 3 had an implant at T1 and T2. Measurements were made from landmarks at predetermined levels (superior cortex of the IAN or the most inferior point in the nasal floor (NF) in the direction of the crest of bone height (Group C, 2, and 3). To avoid osseous changes due to placement, measurements were made from the inferior alveolar nerve for mandibular implants or the nasal floor for maxillary implants. Recognizing gender-based disparities in jaw size, we monitored percentage changes in bone.

Results: Loss of alveolar bone width across all groups was common. When bivariate analysis was performed after Bonferroni correction (p<0.025), changes in alveolar bone width were significantly greater in females (p = 0.004). Although the loss in the basal bone was present, it was not significant between the sexes nor as great as alveolar bone resorption (p=0.880). When comparing groups using bivariate analysis, differences were not statistically significant between treatment groups and the control group (p=0.050) for basal bone and for alveolar bone (p=0.052). In the regression analysis for sex or groups, neither was statistically significant for either basal or alveolar bone (p >0.05).

Conclusion: Dental implants do not arrest post-extraction atrophy in either alveolar or basal bone. Females exhibited a statistically greater rate of alveolar bone loss. Stable long-term implant success necessitates precise placement.

种植牙植入后骨体积稳定性的长期CBCT评价。1 -将性作为一种风险因素。
目的:本回顾性研究评估种植体对牙槽骨和基底骨的长期影响,以确定患者的性别是否会影响颌骨的尺寸变化,并评估与拔牙后不干预相比,种植体是否能阻止骨萎缩。方法和材料:本研究已获得IRB批准。在研究的125例患者(432个部位)中,53%为女性。所有人都接受了两次cbct,平均间隔4.7年。扫描结果被分成三组。在对照组中,第二次扫描(T2)时不替换拔牙部位(第一次CBCT或T1)。2组T1时不种植,T2时种植。第三组分别在T1和T2进行种植。在骨高度峰方向的预定水平(鼻内皮层上或鼻底最下点)进行测量(C组、2组和3组)。为了避免放置造成的骨改变,下颌种植体从下牙槽神经测量,上颌种植体从鼻底测量。认识到下颌大小的性别差异,我们监测了骨骼的百分比变化。结果:牙槽骨宽度缺损在各组中均有发生。经Bonferroni校正后进行双变量分析(p0.05)。结论:种植体不能抑制拔牙后牙槽骨和基底骨的萎缩。统计上,女性牙槽骨丢失率更高。长期稳定的种植成功需要精确的放置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信