Assessment of inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
{"title":"Assessment of inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration.","authors":"Burcu Polat Gültekin, Sebile Çomçali, Elif Şahin","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000043047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assesses the inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A total of 90 participants were categorized into 3 groups: a control group, individuals with nonneovascular AMD under follow-up, and individuals with neovascular AMD who had not yet started injection treatment. Demographic and clinical parameters, including body mass index, were analyzed. The mSIS, based on serum albumin levels and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, was used to determine the level of systemic inflammation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (P = .08) or gender (P = .06). Regarding body mass index, no significant differences were observed between the groups (P = .06). When comparing mSIS scores between the groups, no significant differences were found for mSIS scores 0 and 1 across the groups. However, for mSIS 2, the proportion of participants with an mSIS score of 2 was significantly higher in the neovascular AMD group compared with the control group (P = .01). These findings suggest that mSIS may be a valuable tool for assessing systemic inflammation in AMD. The higher mSIS scores in the neovascular AMD group may indicate that disease severity is associated with increased inflammation. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm the utility and clinical relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 26","pages":"e43047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000043047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assesses the inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A total of 90 participants were categorized into 3 groups: a control group, individuals with nonneovascular AMD under follow-up, and individuals with neovascular AMD who had not yet started injection treatment. Demographic and clinical parameters, including body mass index, were analyzed. The mSIS, based on serum albumin levels and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, was used to determine the level of systemic inflammation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (P = .08) or gender (P = .06). Regarding body mass index, no significant differences were observed between the groups (P = .06). When comparing mSIS scores between the groups, no significant differences were found for mSIS scores 0 and 1 across the groups. However, for mSIS 2, the proportion of participants with an mSIS score of 2 was significantly higher in the neovascular AMD group compared with the control group (P = .01). These findings suggest that mSIS may be a valuable tool for assessing systemic inflammation in AMD. The higher mSIS scores in the neovascular AMD group may indicate that disease severity is associated with increased inflammation. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm the utility and clinical relevance.
期刊介绍:
Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties.
As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.