Assessment of inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Burcu Polat Gültekin, Sebile Çomçali, Elif Şahin
{"title":"Assessment of inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration.","authors":"Burcu Polat Gültekin, Sebile Çomçali, Elif Şahin","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000043047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assesses the inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A total of 90 participants were categorized into 3 groups: a control group, individuals with nonneovascular AMD under follow-up, and individuals with neovascular AMD who had not yet started injection treatment. Demographic and clinical parameters, including body mass index, were analyzed. The mSIS, based on serum albumin levels and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, was used to determine the level of systemic inflammation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (P = .08) or gender (P = .06). Regarding body mass index, no significant differences were observed between the groups (P = .06). When comparing mSIS scores between the groups, no significant differences were found for mSIS scores 0 and 1 across the groups. However, for mSIS 2, the proportion of participants with an mSIS score of 2 was significantly higher in the neovascular AMD group compared with the control group (P = .01). These findings suggest that mSIS may be a valuable tool for assessing systemic inflammation in AMD. The higher mSIS scores in the neovascular AMD group may indicate that disease severity is associated with increased inflammation. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm the utility and clinical relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 26","pages":"e43047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12212847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000043047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the inflammation levels through the modified systemic inflammation score (mSIS) in patients with nonneovascular and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A total of 90 participants were categorized into 3 groups: a control group, individuals with nonneovascular AMD under follow-up, and individuals with neovascular AMD who had not yet started injection treatment. Demographic and clinical parameters, including body mass index, were analyzed. The mSIS, based on serum albumin levels and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, was used to determine the level of systemic inflammation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (P = .08) or gender (P = .06). Regarding body mass index, no significant differences were observed between the groups (P = .06). When comparing mSIS scores between the groups, no significant differences were found for mSIS scores 0 and 1 across the groups. However, for mSIS 2, the proportion of participants with an mSIS score of 2 was significantly higher in the neovascular AMD group compared with the control group (P = .01). These findings suggest that mSIS may be a valuable tool for assessing systemic inflammation in AMD. The higher mSIS scores in the neovascular AMD group may indicate that disease severity is associated with increased inflammation. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm the utility and clinical relevance.

通过改进的全身炎症评分评估非新生血管性和新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的炎症水平
本研究通过改进的系统性炎症评分(mSIS)评估非新生血管性和新生血管性黄斑变性(AMD)患者的炎症水平。90名参与者被分为3组:对照组、随访中的非新生血管性AMD患者和尚未开始注射治疗的新生血管性AMD患者。分析人口统计学和临床参数,包括身体质量指数。mSIS基于血清白蛋白水平和淋巴细胞与单核细胞的比例,用于确定全身性炎症的水平。两组间在年龄(P = .08)和性别(P = .06)方面无显著差异。体重指数组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.06)。当比较各组间的mSIS评分时,各组间mSIS评分0和1无显著差异。然而,对于mSIS 2,与对照组相比,新生血管性AMD组中mSIS评分为2的参与者比例显著高于对照组(P = 0.01)。这些发现表明mSIS可能是评估AMD全身性炎症的有价值的工具。新血管性AMD组较高的mSIS评分可能表明疾病严重程度与炎症增加有关。需要进一步的大规模研究来证实其实用性和临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信