Pelvic Adhesion Ultrasound New Scoring System: A Promising Preoperative Assessment Tool for Laparoscopy.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Qiuling Guo, Yanru Li, Weiru Lin, Caihong Liu, Jincheng Dai, Guorong Lyu, Shanshan Su
{"title":"Pelvic Adhesion Ultrasound New Scoring System: A Promising Preoperative Assessment Tool for Laparoscopy.","authors":"Qiuling Guo, Yanru Li, Weiru Lin, Caihong Liu, Jincheng Dai, Guorong Lyu, Shanshan Su","doi":"10.1002/jum.16758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a new ultrasound-based scoring system for pelvic adhesions and evaluate its predictive performance through intraoperative findings during laparoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was conducted from April 2023 to June 2024, including 152 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery at our hospital. Imaging and clinical data were collected, and preoperative assessment of pelvic adhesions was performed using a novel ultrasound scoring system. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess its correlation with the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) score. The predictive performance, accuracy, and clinical utility of the new scoring system were evaluated from multiple perspectives using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pearson correlation analysis showed a strong correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.88, P < .001) between the new ultrasound scoring system and rAFS. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting mild, moderate, and severe pelvic adhesions using the new scoring system were 0.927, 0.952, and 0.937, indicating good predictive performance. Calibration curve analysis demonstrated high predictive accuracy for pelvic adhesions. DCA indicated strong clinical utility of the new scoring system, and the clinical impact curve showed its ability to accurately identify high-risk pelvic adhesion patients during laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The newly established scoring system demonstrated good predictive performance, discrimination, and clinical utility, providing a valuable guiding tool for the prediction of the presence or absence of adhesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a new ultrasound-based scoring system for pelvic adhesions and evaluate its predictive performance through intraoperative findings during laparoscopy.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted from April 2023 to June 2024, including 152 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery at our hospital. Imaging and clinical data were collected, and preoperative assessment of pelvic adhesions was performed using a novel ultrasound scoring system. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess its correlation with the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) score. The predictive performance, accuracy, and clinical utility of the new scoring system were evaluated from multiple perspectives using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curves.

Results: Pearson correlation analysis showed a strong correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.88, P < .001) between the new ultrasound scoring system and rAFS. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting mild, moderate, and severe pelvic adhesions using the new scoring system were 0.927, 0.952, and 0.937, indicating good predictive performance. Calibration curve analysis demonstrated high predictive accuracy for pelvic adhesions. DCA indicated strong clinical utility of the new scoring system, and the clinical impact curve showed its ability to accurately identify high-risk pelvic adhesion patients during laparoscopic surgery.

Conclusions: The newly established scoring system demonstrated good predictive performance, discrimination, and clinical utility, providing a valuable guiding tool for the prediction of the presence or absence of adhesions.

盆腔粘连超声新评分系统:腹腔镜术前评估工具。
目的:建立一种新的基于超声的盆腔粘连评分系统,并通过腹腔镜术中表现评估其预测性能。方法:本前瞻性研究于2023年4月至2024年6月在我院行腹腔镜手术的成人患者152例。收集影像学和临床资料,并使用一种新型超声评分系统进行盆腔粘连术前评估。使用Pearson相关分析来评估其与修订后的美国生育学会(rAFS)评分的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)和临床影响曲线,从多个角度评估新评分系统的预测性能、准确性和临床实用性。结果:Pearson相关分析显示相关性强(相关系数= 0.88,P)。结论:新建立的评分系统具有良好的预测性能、辨别性和临床实用性,为预测粘连的存在与否提供了有价值的指导工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信