{"title":"Incidence of and Risk Factors for Silicone Oil-Associated Cystoid Macular Edema After Pars Plana Vitrectomy.","authors":"Jeffrey Liu, William Wirostko, Baseer Ahmad","doi":"10.1177/24741264251345845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To observe the incidence of and risk factors for cystoid macular edema (CME) after silicone oil (SO) implantation after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for retinal detachment (RD) repair. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective analysis used the TriNetX database to identify patients who received SO tamponade after PPV for RD between March 2014 and March 2023. The onset and regression of CME were identified using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The demographics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative disease course of patients with and patients without CME were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> tests, Student <i>t</i> tests, and logistic regression models. <b>Results:</b> Twenty (25.3%) of 79 eyes developed CME after intraocular insertion of SO. The use of 1000 cs SO (n = 50) vs 5000 cs SO (n = 29) was significantly associated with CME onset (odds ratio, 4.46; <i>P</i> < .05). The mean (± SD) SO tamponade duration was 199.0 ± 125.5 days. The mean time from SO implantation to detection of CME was 82.6 ± 57.9 days. Disease regression occurred in 15 (75.0%) of the 20 eyes with CME and was recorded a mean of 218.2 ± 256.2 days after SO removal. Compared with untreated groups, the frequency of CME regression was not influenced by the administration of sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (75.0% vs 75.0%; <i>P</i> = 1.00), prednisolone acetate eyedrops (75.0% vs 75.0%; <i>P</i> = 1.00), or ketorolac eyedrops (71.4% vs 76.9%; <i>P</i> = .79). <b>Conclusions:</b> The viscosity of the SO used for vitreous tamponade in RD repair may play a role in the development of CME, with lighter grade oil increasing the risk for disease. Furthermore, SO removal alone potentially leads to a prominent reduction in CME in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251345845"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251345845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To observe the incidence of and risk factors for cystoid macular edema (CME) after silicone oil (SO) implantation after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for retinal detachment (RD) repair. Methods: This retrospective analysis used the TriNetX database to identify patients who received SO tamponade after PPV for RD between March 2014 and March 2023. The onset and regression of CME were identified using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The demographics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative disease course of patients with and patients without CME were compared using χ2 tests, Student t tests, and logistic regression models. Results: Twenty (25.3%) of 79 eyes developed CME after intraocular insertion of SO. The use of 1000 cs SO (n = 50) vs 5000 cs SO (n = 29) was significantly associated with CME onset (odds ratio, 4.46; P < .05). The mean (± SD) SO tamponade duration was 199.0 ± 125.5 days. The mean time from SO implantation to detection of CME was 82.6 ± 57.9 days. Disease regression occurred in 15 (75.0%) of the 20 eyes with CME and was recorded a mean of 218.2 ± 256.2 days after SO removal. Compared with untreated groups, the frequency of CME regression was not influenced by the administration of sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (75.0% vs 75.0%; P = 1.00), prednisolone acetate eyedrops (75.0% vs 75.0%; P = 1.00), or ketorolac eyedrops (71.4% vs 76.9%; P = .79). Conclusions: The viscosity of the SO used for vitreous tamponade in RD repair may play a role in the development of CME, with lighter grade oil increasing the risk for disease. Furthermore, SO removal alone potentially leads to a prominent reduction in CME in most cases.
目的:观察玻璃体切除(PPV)视网膜脱离修复术后硅油(SO)植入术后囊样黄斑水肿(CME)的发生率及危险因素。方法:回顾性分析使用TriNetX数据库,识别2014年3月至2023年3月期间因RD进行PPV后接受SO填塞的患者。利用光谱域光学相干层析识别CME的发生和消退。采用χ2检验、Student t检验和logistic回归模型对有无CME患者的人口学特征、术中参数和术后病程进行比较。结果:79只眼中有20只(25.3%)眼内植入术后出现CME。使用1000 cs SO (n = 50) vs 5000 cs SO (n = 29)与CME发作显著相关(优势比,4.46;P < 0.05)。SO填塞时间平均(±SD)为199.0±125.5天。从SO植入到CME检测的平均时间为82.6±57.9 d。20只CME眼中有15只(75.0%)出现疾病消退,平均在SO移除后218.2±256.2天。与未治疗组相比,注射亚tenon曲安奈德不影响CME消退的频率(75.0% vs 75.0%;P = 1.00),醋酸泼尼松龙滴眼液(75.0% vs 75.0%;P = 1.00)或酮咯酸滴眼液(71.4% vs 76.9%;P = .79)。结论:玻璃体填塞修复中使用的油粘度可能与CME的发生有关,油的质量越轻,患病风险越高。此外,在大多数情况下,单独去除SO可能导致CME的显著减少。