Pearce B Haldeman, Liane Chun, Cyril Harfouche, Ricardo Rosales, Conner Trimm, Christopher Reid, James H Flint, Frank Chiarappa
{"title":"Local Antibiotic Administration Decreases Surgical Site Infections Following Extremity Sarcoma Surgery.","authors":"Pearce B Haldeman, Liane Chun, Cyril Harfouche, Ricardo Rosales, Conner Trimm, Christopher Reid, James H Flint, Frank Chiarappa","doi":"10.1002/jso.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The morbidity associated with the treatment of extremity sarcoma resection is significant, and surgical site infection (SSI) remains a prevalent concern. This cohort study compares the outcomes of patients who received local, intra-wound antibiotic powder with those who did not during the resection of extremity sarcomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 83 patients. Of these, 25 (30%) patients had received local vancomycin and/or tobramycin antibiotic powder just before wound closure, while 58 (70%) underwent routine closure without administration of local antibiotics. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical characteristics were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The local antibiotic group consisted of larger tumors (11.50 ± 7.65 vs. 7.79 ± 5.27 cm; p = 0.038) undergoing longer surgeries (594 ± 323 vs. 360 ± 285 min; p = 0.003) with more estimated blood loss (426 ± 399 vs. 177 ± 539 mL; p = 0.023). The postoperative SSI rate was lower in the antibiotic group at 16% versus 40% in the no antibiotic group (p = 0.043). When accounting for possible confounders, the odds ratio of SSI in the antibiotic group versus no antibiotic group was 0.0747 [0.00882, 0.404] (p = 0.0075).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the significantly greater tumor burden in the antibiotic group, this study suggests an effective role for local antibiotic powder administration in the prevention of postoperative infections in extremity sarcoma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: The morbidity associated with the treatment of extremity sarcoma resection is significant, and surgical site infection (SSI) remains a prevalent concern. This cohort study compares the outcomes of patients who received local, intra-wound antibiotic powder with those who did not during the resection of extremity sarcomas.
Methods: This study included 83 patients. Of these, 25 (30%) patients had received local vancomycin and/or tobramycin antibiotic powder just before wound closure, while 58 (70%) underwent routine closure without administration of local antibiotics. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical characteristics were collected.
Results: The local antibiotic group consisted of larger tumors (11.50 ± 7.65 vs. 7.79 ± 5.27 cm; p = 0.038) undergoing longer surgeries (594 ± 323 vs. 360 ± 285 min; p = 0.003) with more estimated blood loss (426 ± 399 vs. 177 ± 539 mL; p = 0.023). The postoperative SSI rate was lower in the antibiotic group at 16% versus 40% in the no antibiotic group (p = 0.043). When accounting for possible confounders, the odds ratio of SSI in the antibiotic group versus no antibiotic group was 0.0747 [0.00882, 0.404] (p = 0.0075).
Conclusion: Despite the significantly greater tumor burden in the antibiotic group, this study suggests an effective role for local antibiotic powder administration in the prevention of postoperative infections in extremity sarcoma surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.