How Invasive is the Free Gracilis Muscle Flap? A Prospective Study on Donor Site Morbidity.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Nikolaus Wachtel, Riccardo E Giunta, Maximilian Hirschmann, Marc Hellweg, Tim Nuernberger, Nicholas Moellhoff, Denis Ehrl
{"title":"How Invasive is the Free Gracilis Muscle Flap? A Prospective Study on Donor Site Morbidity.","authors":"Nikolaus Wachtel, Riccardo E Giunta, Maximilian Hirschmann, Marc Hellweg, Tim Nuernberger, Nicholas Moellhoff, Denis Ehrl","doi":"10.1055/a-2632-2663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Free gracilis muscle (GM) flaps represent a reliable workhorse procedure in the field of plastic and trauma surgery. However, only a small number of studies have examined this large group of patients regarding the morbidity of flap harvest. The aim of this prospective study was therefore to objectively investigate the morbidity of free GM flaps.A control group (<i>n</i> = 100) without surgery was recruited to assess interindividual differences in strength and range of motion (ROM) in the hip and knee joint (dominant vs. nondominant side). Additionally, for 50 patients with free GM flap surgery, these parameters were assessed in an identical manner.The control group showed significant interindividual differences in strength for abduction and adduction in the hip joint when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side, but no significant differences in the ROM. GM flap harvest led to no significant differences in maximum force 20.3 (± 13.8) months after surgery in all parameters/movements that were assessed. However, the ROM for abduction in the ipsilateral hip joint was significantly reduced after surgery.The GM flap has a low donor site morbidity and should therefore be considered as a first-line option for microsurgical reconstructive procedures. Moreover, the low morbidity is not affected by preexisting differences in strength when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2632-2663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Free gracilis muscle (GM) flaps represent a reliable workhorse procedure in the field of plastic and trauma surgery. However, only a small number of studies have examined this large group of patients regarding the morbidity of flap harvest. The aim of this prospective study was therefore to objectively investigate the morbidity of free GM flaps.A control group (n = 100) without surgery was recruited to assess interindividual differences in strength and range of motion (ROM) in the hip and knee joint (dominant vs. nondominant side). Additionally, for 50 patients with free GM flap surgery, these parameters were assessed in an identical manner.The control group showed significant interindividual differences in strength for abduction and adduction in the hip joint when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side, but no significant differences in the ROM. GM flap harvest led to no significant differences in maximum force 20.3 (± 13.8) months after surgery in all parameters/movements that were assessed. However, the ROM for abduction in the ipsilateral hip joint was significantly reduced after surgery.The GM flap has a low donor site morbidity and should therefore be considered as a first-line option for microsurgical reconstructive procedures. Moreover, the low morbidity is not affected by preexisting differences in strength when comparing the dominant to the nondominant side.

游离股薄肌瓣的侵入性如何?供体部位发病率的前瞻性研究。
游离股薄肌(GM)皮瓣在整形和创伤外科领域是一种可靠的主力手术。然而,只有少数研究调查了这一大群患者关于皮瓣摘取的发病率。因此,这项前瞻性研究的目的是客观地调查游离GM皮瓣的发病率。未进行手术的对照组(n = 100)被招募来评估髋关节和膝关节(优势侧与非优势侧)的力量和活动范围(ROM)的个体差异。此外,对50例接受游离GM皮瓣手术的患者,以相同的方式评估这些参数。对照组在优势侧和非优势侧比较时,髋关节外展和内收的力量存在显著的个体差异,但在ROM方面没有显著差异。GM皮瓣收获导致手术后20.3(±13.8)个月的所有参数/运动评估的最大力量没有显著差异。然而,手术后同侧髋关节外展的ROM明显减少。GM皮瓣供区发病率低,因此应考虑作为显微外科重建手术的一线选择。此外,当比较优势侧和非优势侧时,低发病率不受先前存在的强度差异的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信