Pictogram comprehension and medication-use literacy among undergraduate students: a cross-sectional survey study.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2522312
Kritsanee Saramunee, Bunleu Sungthong, Chatmanee Taengthonglang, Wiraphol Phimarn
{"title":"Pictogram comprehension and medication-use literacy among undergraduate students: a cross-sectional survey study.","authors":"Kritsanee Saramunee, Bunleu Sungthong, Chatmanee Taengthonglang, Wiraphol Phimarn","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2522312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pictograms are widely used in pharmacy practice to enhance patient understanding, especially in contexts where language or health literacy barriers exist. However, limited data are available on the comprehension of United States Pharmacopeia Convention: Drug Information for the Health Care Professional (USP-DI) pictograms among Thai undergraduate students. This study assessed the understanding of USP-DI pictograms and medication-use literacy, and explored factors associated with pictogram comprehension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire was conducted among 637 university students between August 2023 and April 2024. The Medication Use Literacy Test (MULT) assessed literacy, and the USP-DI pictogram comprehension test evaluated visual understanding. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with comprehension levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 637 participants, the MULT revealed high literacy, with over 90% of questions answered correctly. The mean score for USP-DI pictogram comprehension was 21.82 ± 3.82. Students in health sciences programmes demonstrated the highest proficiency in both tests, followed by those in social sciences and science and technology programmes, with statistically significant differences (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that students aged >20 years had lower pictogram comprehension than younger students (odds ratio [OR] = 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.88; <i>P</i> = 0.02). Students with a Grade Point Average <3.00/4.00 (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.96; <i>P</i> = 0.04) and those from non-health science faculties (OR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.02-0.08; <i>P</i> < 0.001) also showed significantly lower comprehension levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights disparities in pictogram comprehension among Thai undergraduates and affirms the influence of academic discipline, age, and academic performance. The findings support the need for targeted educational strategies to enhance medication-use literacy and pictogram understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2522312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2522312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pictograms are widely used in pharmacy practice to enhance patient understanding, especially in contexts where language or health literacy barriers exist. However, limited data are available on the comprehension of United States Pharmacopeia Convention: Drug Information for the Health Care Professional (USP-DI) pictograms among Thai undergraduate students. This study assessed the understanding of USP-DI pictograms and medication-use literacy, and explored factors associated with pictogram comprehension.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire was conducted among 637 university students between August 2023 and April 2024. The Medication Use Literacy Test (MULT) assessed literacy, and the USP-DI pictogram comprehension test evaluated visual understanding. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with comprehension levels.

Results: Among the 637 participants, the MULT revealed high literacy, with over 90% of questions answered correctly. The mean score for USP-DI pictogram comprehension was 21.82 ± 3.82. Students in health sciences programmes demonstrated the highest proficiency in both tests, followed by those in social sciences and science and technology programmes, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that students aged >20 years had lower pictogram comprehension than younger students (odds ratio [OR] = 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.88; P = 0.02). Students with a Grade Point Average <3.00/4.00 (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.96; P = 0.04) and those from non-health science faculties (OR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.02-0.08; P < 0.001) also showed significantly lower comprehension levels.

Conclusions: This study highlights disparities in pictogram comprehension among Thai undergraduates and affirms the influence of academic discipline, age, and academic performance. The findings support the need for targeted educational strategies to enhance medication-use literacy and pictogram understanding.

大学生象形文字理解与用药素养的横断面调查研究。
背景:象形文字在药学实践中被广泛使用,以提高患者的理解,特别是在语言或健康素养存在障碍的情况下。然而,关于泰国大学生对美国药典公约:卫生保健专业人员药物信息(USP-DI)象形图的理解的数据有限。本研究评估了对USP-DI象形文字的理解和药物使用素养,并探讨了象形文字理解的相关因素。方法:于2023年8月至2024年4月对637名大学生进行了横断面调查,采用结构化问卷。药物使用读写能力测试(MULT)评估读写能力,USP-DI象形文字理解测试评估视觉理解能力。二元逻辑回归用于识别与理解水平相关的因素。结果:在637名参与者中,MULT显示出较高的识字率,超过90%的问题回答正确。USP-DI象形文字理解的平均得分为21.82±3.82。健康科学专业的学生在这两项测试中都表现出最高的熟练程度,其次是社会科学和科学技术专业的学生,差异有统计学意义(P 20岁学生的象形文字理解能力低于年龄较小的学生(优势比[OR] = 0.47;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.25-0.88;p = 0.02)。平均绩点P = 0.04)和来自非健康科学学院的学生(OR = 0.04;95% ci: 0.02-0.08;结论:本研究突出了泰国大学生象形文字理解的差异,并肯定了学科、年龄和学习成绩对象形文字理解的影响。研究结果支持需要有针对性的教育策略,以提高药物使用素养和象形文字的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信