A New Approach to Estimate Habitual Intake of Nutrients with Skewed Distribution.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Smitha Joseph, Sumathi Swaminathan, Santu Ghosh, Tinku Thomas
{"title":"A New Approach to Estimate Habitual Intake of Nutrients with Skewed Distribution.","authors":"Smitha Joseph, Sumathi Swaminathan, Santu Ghosh, Tinku Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Habitual nutrient intake in a population is typically estimated using multiple 24-h recalls. Existing methods to estimate the habitual intake of skewed distributions are computationally intense.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To propose a new method to estimate habitual nutrient intake with skewed intake distributions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed gamma regression method for estimating habitual intake distribution is compared with National Research Council and Iowa State University (ISU) methods using sample data of 4 nonconsecutive diet recalls collected from 120 children aged 0.5-5 y in Bihar, India. The gamma regression and ISU methods were considered comparable when the estimated difference in the habitual nutrient intake and its 95% confidence interval included the 8.2% equivalence limit for that nutrient. The impact of skewness on the habitual intake estimation was compared by simulating data with varying degrees of skewness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (quartile 1, quartile 3) intakes estimated from gamma regression, ISU, and National Research Council methods were respectively 896 kcal (757, 1043 kcal), 895 kcal (752, 1054 kcal), and 893 kcal (748,1045 kcal) for energy, 22.6 g (19.5, 28.9 g), 22.6 g (19.5, 29.6 g), and 22.7 g (19.5, 29.5 g) for protein, 5.8 mg (3.3, 7.7 mg), 6.1 mg (3.3, 8.3 mg), and 6.1 mg (3.3, 8.2 mg) for iron, and 107 mcg retinol activity equivalents (RAE) (75, 134 mcg RAE), 114 mcg RAE (80, 143 mcg RAE), and 113 mcg RAE (79, 143 mcg RAE) for vitamin A. The estimates of percent bias of the gamma regression method were within the 8.2% equivalence limit, 0.32% (-0.03%, 0.67%) for energy, 0.28% (-0.14%, 0.70%) for protein, 4.36% (1.51%, 7.21%) for iron, and 3.53% (0.74%, 6.33%) for vitamin A. Simulation demonstrated that gamma regression method is comparable to ISU method for different levels of skewness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The simpler gamma regression method offers a viable alternative to address skewness in intake distributions by providing equivalent estimates without the complexity of the 2-step transformation of the ISU method.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.05.050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Habitual nutrient intake in a population is typically estimated using multiple 24-h recalls. Existing methods to estimate the habitual intake of skewed distributions are computationally intense.

Objectives: To propose a new method to estimate habitual nutrient intake with skewed intake distributions.

Methods: The proposed gamma regression method for estimating habitual intake distribution is compared with National Research Council and Iowa State University (ISU) methods using sample data of 4 nonconsecutive diet recalls collected from 120 children aged 0.5-5 y in Bihar, India. The gamma regression and ISU methods were considered comparable when the estimated difference in the habitual nutrient intake and its 95% confidence interval included the 8.2% equivalence limit for that nutrient. The impact of skewness on the habitual intake estimation was compared by simulating data with varying degrees of skewness.

Results: The median (quartile 1, quartile 3) intakes estimated from gamma regression, ISU, and National Research Council methods were respectively 896 kcal (757, 1043 kcal), 895 kcal (752, 1054 kcal), and 893 kcal (748,1045 kcal) for energy, 22.6 g (19.5, 28.9 g), 22.6 g (19.5, 29.6 g), and 22.7 g (19.5, 29.5 g) for protein, 5.8 mg (3.3, 7.7 mg), 6.1 mg (3.3, 8.3 mg), and 6.1 mg (3.3, 8.2 mg) for iron, and 107 mcg retinol activity equivalents (RAE) (75, 134 mcg RAE), 114 mcg RAE (80, 143 mcg RAE), and 113 mcg RAE (79, 143 mcg RAE) for vitamin A. The estimates of percent bias of the gamma regression method were within the 8.2% equivalence limit, 0.32% (-0.03%, 0.67%) for energy, 0.28% (-0.14%, 0.70%) for protein, 4.36% (1.51%, 7.21%) for iron, and 3.53% (0.74%, 6.33%) for vitamin A. Simulation demonstrated that gamma regression method is comparable to ISU method for different levels of skewness.

Conclusions: The simpler gamma regression method offers a viable alternative to address skewness in intake distributions by providing equivalent estimates without the complexity of the 2-step transformation of the ISU method.

偏斜分布营养物质习惯性摄入量估算的新方法
背景:一个人群的习惯性营养摄入通常是通过多次24小时回忆来估计的。现有的估计偏态分布习惯摄入量的方法计算量很大。目的:提出一种估算营养物质习惯摄入量分布偏态的新方法。方法:利用印度比哈尔邦120名0.5 - 5岁儿童的4次非连续饮食回忆样本数据,将所提出的用于估计习惯摄入分布的伽马回归方法与美国国家研究委员会(NRC)和爱荷华州立大学(ISU)的方法进行比较。当习惯营养素摄入量的估计差异及其95%置信区间包括该营养素的8.2%等值限时,伽马回归和ISU方法被认为具有可比性。通过模拟不同偏度的数据,比较了偏度对习惯性摄入估计的影响。结果:伽马回归、ISU和NRC方法估计的中位数(四分位数1、三分位数)摄入能量分别为896千卡(757、1043)、895千卡(752、1054)和893千卡(748、1045),蛋白质为22.6克(19.5、28.9)、22.6克(19.5、29.6)和22.7克(19.5、29.5),铁为5.8毫克(3.3、7.7)、6.1毫克(3.3、8.2),RAE为107毫克(75、134)、114毫克(80、143)和113毫克(79、134)。伽玛回归方法估计的偏差百分比在8.2%的等效极限内,能量为0.32%(-0.03,0.67),蛋白质为0.28%(-0.14,0.70),铁为4.36%(1.51,7.21),维生素a为3.53%(0.74,6.33)。模拟表明,伽玛回归方法与ISU方法在不同偏度水平下具有可比性。结论:简单的伽玛回归方法提供了一种可行的替代方法,通过提供等效估计来解决进气分布的偏态,而不需要ISU方法的两步转换的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信