Development and Validation of a Korean Trauma and Injury Severity Score (K-TRISS) Model for Predicting Trauma Outcomes.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jungsub So, Kyoungwon Jung, Junsik Kwon, Byung Hee Kang, Yo Han Lee, Eun Hae Lee, Chan Ik Park, Jayun Cho, Hoonsung Park, Seoyoung Song, Jayoung Yoo, Inhae Heo
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Korean Trauma and Injury Severity Score (K-TRISS) Model for Predicting Trauma Outcomes.","authors":"Jungsub So, Kyoungwon Jung, Junsik Kwon, Byung Hee Kang, Yo Han Lee, Eun Hae Lee, Chan Ik Park, Jayun Cho, Hoonsung Park, Seoyoung Song, Jayoung Yoo, Inhae Heo","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) was first developed in 1987, it has been widely used to predict trauma outcomes. However, numerous attempts have been made to adjust coefficients or develop new prediction models, as TRISS may not align with the local conditions. This study aimed to develop a Korean-TRISS (K-TRISS) model suitable for the Korean population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from adult patients with blunt trauma in the Korea Trauma Data Bank (KTDB) from January 2017 to December 2021. A new set of TRISS coefficients (K-TRISS-1) was derived from the study data using a logistic regression method. We compared the predictive ability of the K-TRISS-1 with the previous Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) in 1987 and the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) model in 2009. The predictive power of the models was evaluated with the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, and the validity was evaluated with the C-statistic and bootstrap verification methods. Additionally, we enhanced the model construction (K-TRISS-2) by converting the age variable from a categorical format to a continuous one.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 128,534 cases were included in the statistical analysis. The comparison of AUROC values indicated that K-TRISS-1 (0.9232) outperformed MTOS (0.9210) and NTDB (0.9190), with their 95% confidence intervals showing some tendency (0.9196-0.9267, 0.9200-0.9230, and 0.9180-0.9210, respectively). However, K-TRISS-2 (0.9336, 0.9305-0.9367) had a significantly higher AUROC value compared to those of the others and showed excellent predictive power in the C-statistic and bootstrap tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proposes the K-TRISS model, derived from the KTDB, which does not significantly differ from the previous models in terms of predictive power. Furthermore, we were able to construct a model demonstrating improved predictive power when converting age to a continuous variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 25","pages":"e122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) was first developed in 1987, it has been widely used to predict trauma outcomes. However, numerous attempts have been made to adjust coefficients or develop new prediction models, as TRISS may not align with the local conditions. This study aimed to develop a Korean-TRISS (K-TRISS) model suitable for the Korean population.

Methods: We analyzed data from adult patients with blunt trauma in the Korea Trauma Data Bank (KTDB) from January 2017 to December 2021. A new set of TRISS coefficients (K-TRISS-1) was derived from the study data using a logistic regression method. We compared the predictive ability of the K-TRISS-1 with the previous Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) in 1987 and the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) model in 2009. The predictive power of the models was evaluated with the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves, and the validity was evaluated with the C-statistic and bootstrap verification methods. Additionally, we enhanced the model construction (K-TRISS-2) by converting the age variable from a categorical format to a continuous one.

Results: Overall, 128,534 cases were included in the statistical analysis. The comparison of AUROC values indicated that K-TRISS-1 (0.9232) outperformed MTOS (0.9210) and NTDB (0.9190), with their 95% confidence intervals showing some tendency (0.9196-0.9267, 0.9200-0.9230, and 0.9180-0.9210, respectively). However, K-TRISS-2 (0.9336, 0.9305-0.9367) had a significantly higher AUROC value compared to those of the others and showed excellent predictive power in the C-statistic and bootstrap tests.

Conclusion: This study proposes the K-TRISS model, derived from the KTDB, which does not significantly differ from the previous models in terms of predictive power. Furthermore, we were able to construct a model demonstrating improved predictive power when converting age to a continuous variable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

韩国创伤和损伤严重程度评分(K-TRISS)模型预测创伤结果的发展和验证。
背景:自1987年首次开发创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)以来,它已被广泛用于预测创伤结局。然而,由于TRISS可能不符合当地条件,已经进行了许多调整系数或开发新预测模型的尝试。本研究旨在建立适合韩国人口的韩国- triss (K-TRISS)模型。方法:我们分析了2017年1月至2021年12月韩国创伤数据库(KTDB)中成年钝性创伤患者的数据。利用logistic回归方法从研究数据中得到一组新的TRISS系数(K-TRISS-1)。我们将K-TRISS-1的预测能力与1987年的主要创伤结局研究(MTOS)和2009年的国家创伤数据库(NTDB)模型进行了比较。用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评价模型的预测能力,用c统计量和bootstrap验证方法评价模型的有效性。此外,我们通过将年龄变量从分类格式转换为连续格式来增强模型构建(K-TRISS-2)。结果:共纳入统计分析128,534例。AUROC值比较表明,k - trss -1(0.9232)优于MTOS(0.9210)和NTDB(0.9190),其95%置信区间分别为0.9196-0.9267、0.9200-0.9230和0.9180-0.9210。而k - trss -2(0.9336, 0.9305-0.9367)的AUROC值显著高于其他参数,在c统计量和bootstrap检验中表现出优异的预测能力。结论:本研究提出了基于KTDB的K-TRISS模型,该模型在预测能力方面与以往的模型没有显著差异。此外,当将年龄转换为连续变量时,我们能够构建一个模型来展示改进的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信