Variability of Characterization of Total Body Surface Area in Burn Outcomes: A Burn Model System Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Eloise W Stanton, Deja Nicholas, Andrew Humbert, Colleen M Ryan, Gretchen J Carrougher, Barclay T Stewart, Haig A Yenikomshian
{"title":"Variability of Characterization of Total Body Surface Area in Burn Outcomes: A Burn Model System Study.","authors":"Eloise W Stanton, Deja Nicholas, Andrew Humbert, Colleen M Ryan, Gretchen J Carrougher, Barclay T Stewart, Haig A Yenikomshian","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total body surface area (TBSA) burned is critical for assessing burn extent and guiding acute treatment, but its role in predicting long-term outcomes remains underexplored. This study leverages the Burn Model Systems (BMS) database to evaluate TBSA's characterization and its predictive value for survivors' outcomes, aiming to propose standardized approaches for its use. Publications from the BMS database (1994-2024) were analyzed for TBSA characterization and its relationship to outcomes. Outcomes included patient-reported measures (e.g., quality of life, psychological well-being) and objective outcomes (e.g., physical recovery, complications). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize TBSA usage across studies and its influence on outcomes. Of 107 publications, 91 (85%) included TBSA data. Among these, 91% used TBSA as a continuous variable, 23% employed categorical methods, and 16% utilized both. Categorical TBSA stratification varied, with deciles (n = 6) and quintiles (n = 3) being most common, while others used inconsistent approaches. Approximately 32% of studies assessed TBSA's direct impact on outcomes such as physical and psychosocial recovery, return to work, and pain/itch. A quarter of studies included TBSA as a covariate without directly examining its predictive value. Of 32 papers reporting TBSA outcomes, 74.4% demonstrated significant impact on outcomes. TBSA is widely utilized but inconsistently characterized, with few studies directly assessing its role in long-term outcomes. Standardizing TBSA reporting could improve predictive accuracy, facilitate cross-study comparisons, and guide evidence-based care for burn survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Total body surface area (TBSA) burned is critical for assessing burn extent and guiding acute treatment, but its role in predicting long-term outcomes remains underexplored. This study leverages the Burn Model Systems (BMS) database to evaluate TBSA's characterization and its predictive value for survivors' outcomes, aiming to propose standardized approaches for its use. Publications from the BMS database (1994-2024) were analyzed for TBSA characterization and its relationship to outcomes. Outcomes included patient-reported measures (e.g., quality of life, psychological well-being) and objective outcomes (e.g., physical recovery, complications). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize TBSA usage across studies and its influence on outcomes. Of 107 publications, 91 (85%) included TBSA data. Among these, 91% used TBSA as a continuous variable, 23% employed categorical methods, and 16% utilized both. Categorical TBSA stratification varied, with deciles (n = 6) and quintiles (n = 3) being most common, while others used inconsistent approaches. Approximately 32% of studies assessed TBSA's direct impact on outcomes such as physical and psychosocial recovery, return to work, and pain/itch. A quarter of studies included TBSA as a covariate without directly examining its predictive value. Of 32 papers reporting TBSA outcomes, 74.4% demonstrated significant impact on outcomes. TBSA is widely utilized but inconsistently characterized, with few studies directly assessing its role in long-term outcomes. Standardizing TBSA reporting could improve predictive accuracy, facilitate cross-study comparisons, and guide evidence-based care for burn survivors.

烧伤结果中全身表面积特征的可变性:一项烧伤模型系统研究。
烧伤总体表面积(TBSA)对于评估烧伤程度和指导急性治疗至关重要,但其在预测长期预后方面的作用仍未得到充分探讨。本研究利用烧伤模型系统(BMS)数据库来评估TBSA的特征及其对幸存者预后的预测价值,旨在为其使用提出标准化方法。研究人员分析了BMS数据库1994-2024年的出版物,以确定TBSA的特征及其与结果的关系。结果包括患者报告的措施(如生活质量、心理健康)和客观结果(如身体恢复、并发症)。描述性统计用于总结研究中TBSA的使用情况及其对结果的影响。在107篇出版物中,91篇(85%)包含TBSA数据。其中91%采用TBSA作为连续变量,23%采用分类方法,16%两者兼用。TBSA的分类分层各不相同,十分位数(n = 6)和五分位数(n = 3)是最常见的,而其他方法则不一致。大约32%的研究评估了TBSA对身体和心理康复、重返工作岗位和疼痛/瘙痒等结果的直接影响。四分之一的研究将TBSA作为协变量,但没有直接检验其预测价值。在32篇报道TBSA结果的论文中,74.4%的论文显示TBSA对结果有显著影响。TBSA被广泛应用,但特征不一致,很少有研究直接评估其在长期预后中的作用。标准化TBSA报告可以提高预测准确性,促进交叉研究比较,并指导烧伤幸存者的循证护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信