Hemodynamic changes and mid-term results of surgical correction of de novo aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Takashi Murakami, Yusuke Misumi, Daisuke Yoshioka, Takuji Kawamura, Ai Kawamura, Shin Yajima, Shunsuke Saito, Takashi Yamauchi, Shigeru Miyagawa
{"title":"Hemodynamic changes and mid-term results of surgical correction of de novo aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation.","authors":"Takashi Murakami, Yusuke Misumi, Daisuke Yoshioka, Takuji Kawamura, Ai Kawamura, Shin Yajima, Shunsuke Saito, Takashi Yamauchi, Shigeru Miyagawa","doi":"10.1007/s10047-025-01516-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe aortic insufficiency (AI) is a common complication associated with prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after surgical correction of de novo AI after LVAD implantation. A total of 190 patients underwent CF-LVAD implantation between January 2013 and June 2022. Of these, 24 had trivial or no AI before LVAD implantation and developed moderate or greater de novo AI after LVAD implantation. Patients who underwent aortic valve surgery before or concomitant with LVAD surgery were excluded. Among the 24 patients, surgeries were indicated for medically refractory de novo AI in 11 patients, who were included. The primary outcome was postoperative improvement in hemodynamics as assessed by right heart catheter examination, and the secondary endpoints were 3-year survival and freedom from death and/or heart failure readmission rates. The correction of de novo AI was accomplished with aortic valve closure using a bovine pericardial patch in 10 patients and prosthetic valve replacement in one patient. Significant differences (all p < 0.01) in pre- vs. post-surgery pulmonary artery wedge pressure, cardiac index, and mixed venous blood oxygen saturation were found. The mean follow-up period after LVAD implantation was 1413 days, and the 3-year survival rate was 90.9%. Three-year freedom from postoperative moderate or greater AI rate and freedom from heart failure readmission rate were both 90.9%. Postoperative hemodynamic status and survival outcomes are favorable in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve repair de novo AI after LVAD implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-025-01516-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe aortic insufficiency (AI) is a common complication associated with prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after surgical correction of de novo AI after LVAD implantation. A total of 190 patients underwent CF-LVAD implantation between January 2013 and June 2022. Of these, 24 had trivial or no AI before LVAD implantation and developed moderate or greater de novo AI after LVAD implantation. Patients who underwent aortic valve surgery before or concomitant with LVAD surgery were excluded. Among the 24 patients, surgeries were indicated for medically refractory de novo AI in 11 patients, who were included. The primary outcome was postoperative improvement in hemodynamics as assessed by right heart catheter examination, and the secondary endpoints were 3-year survival and freedom from death and/or heart failure readmission rates. The correction of de novo AI was accomplished with aortic valve closure using a bovine pericardial patch in 10 patients and prosthetic valve replacement in one patient. Significant differences (all p < 0.01) in pre- vs. post-surgery pulmonary artery wedge pressure, cardiac index, and mixed venous blood oxygen saturation were found. The mean follow-up period after LVAD implantation was 1413 days, and the 3-year survival rate was 90.9%. Three-year freedom from postoperative moderate or greater AI rate and freedom from heart failure readmission rate were both 90.9%. Postoperative hemodynamic status and survival outcomes are favorable in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve repair de novo AI after LVAD implantation.

左室辅助装置植入术后新生主动脉瓣功能不全的血流动力学变化及中期结果。
重度主动脉不全(AI)是长时间连续血流左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)治疗的常见并发症。本研究旨在探讨LVAD植入后新生AI手术矫正后的临床效果。2013年1月至2022年6月期间,共有190名患者接受了CF-LVAD植入。其中24例在LVAD植入前有轻微或没有AI,在LVAD植入后出现中度或更严重的新生AI。排除在LVAD手术前或同时进行主动脉瓣手术的患者。纳入的24例患者中,有11例患者因难治性新生AI需要手术治疗。主要终点是通过右心导管检查评估的术后血流动力学改善,次要终点是3年生存率和无死亡和/或心力衰竭再入院率。10例患者采用牛心包补片关闭主动脉瓣,1例患者采用人工瓣膜置换术,完成了新生AI的矫正。差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Artificial Organs
Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Artificial Organs is to introduce to colleagues worldwide a broad spectrum of important new achievements in the field of artificial organs, ranging from fundamental research to clinical applications. The scope of the Journal of Artificial Organs encompasses but is not restricted to blood purification, cardiovascular intervention, biomaterials, and artificial metabolic organs. Additionally, the journal will cover technical and industrial innovations. Membership in the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信