Challenges and Mitigation Strategies in the Development and Feasibility Assessment of a Digital Mental Health Intervention for Depression (VMood): Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Leena W Chau, Jill K Murphy, Vu Cong Nguyen, Hai Nhu Tran, Harry Minas, Raymond W Lam, Kanna Hayashi, Thi Thanh Xuan Nguyen, Emanuel Krebs, John O'Neil
{"title":"Challenges and Mitigation Strategies in the Development and Feasibility Assessment of a Digital Mental Health Intervention for Depression (VMood): Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.","authors":"Leena W Chau, Jill K Murphy, Vu Cong Nguyen, Hai Nhu Tran, Harry Minas, Raymond W Lam, Kanna Hayashi, Thi Thanh Xuan Nguyen, Emanuel Krebs, John O'Neil","doi":"10.2196/68297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to further gaps in mental health care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries such as Vietnam, where care is inaccessible for 90% of those who need it. There has subsequently been a considerable increase in the use of digital mental health interventions such as smartphone apps. Presently, the evidence for such interventions is limited, especially in cases in which the interventions have been adapted from evidence-based in-person formats. Implementation science aims to promote the incorporation of scientific findings into practice. A key determinant of implementation success is an intervention's usability. Hurdles to usability include an intervention being too confusing or time-intensive to use. Facilitators include incorporating a greater number of engagement features and integrating human support.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this implementation science feasibility study was to describe the challenges and mitigation strategies used in the development, usability testing, and implementation of a digital depression intervention (VMood smartphone app) developed in Vietnam. VMood was adapted from an evidence-based in-person intervention originally developed in Canada that is grounded in principles of cognitive behavioral therapy with supportive coaching by a lay health or social services worker. The research team is currently testing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of VMood in a randomized controlled trial across 8 provinces in Vietnam informed by the results of this feasibility assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods feasibility study was organized using an implementation outcome framework focused on acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility. This study involved three data collection components: (1) usability testing (interviews and focus groups with app user and provider participants who tested VMood in 1 Vietnamese province), (2) app metrics (from the early phase of the randomized controlled trial in the same province but from different municipalities), and (3) discourse data (notes from various team meetings, communications, and reports on VMood's development and implementation). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. App use data were analyzed using basic descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of the 3 data components showed that there were seven main challenges: (1) challenges with recruitment and uptake of the app, (2) challenges with use and engagement, (3) screening challenges, (4) digital divide, (5) limitations to digital applications for mental health, (6) technological challenges, and (7) funding and policy constraints. Various solutions to help mitigate the challenges were used by the team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings contribute important evidence on the challenges to the development and feasibility assessment of a digital depression app adapted from an in-person intervention in Vietnam. The findings have applicability for others looking to develop and implement digital interventions in similar contexts, serving as a unique opportunity to share the lessons learned regarding the development and testing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e68297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to further gaps in mental health care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries such as Vietnam, where care is inaccessible for 90% of those who need it. There has subsequently been a considerable increase in the use of digital mental health interventions such as smartphone apps. Presently, the evidence for such interventions is limited, especially in cases in which the interventions have been adapted from evidence-based in-person formats. Implementation science aims to promote the incorporation of scientific findings into practice. A key determinant of implementation success is an intervention's usability. Hurdles to usability include an intervention being too confusing or time-intensive to use. Facilitators include incorporating a greater number of engagement features and integrating human support.

Objective: The aim of this implementation science feasibility study was to describe the challenges and mitigation strategies used in the development, usability testing, and implementation of a digital depression intervention (VMood smartphone app) developed in Vietnam. VMood was adapted from an evidence-based in-person intervention originally developed in Canada that is grounded in principles of cognitive behavioral therapy with supportive coaching by a lay health or social services worker. The research team is currently testing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of VMood in a randomized controlled trial across 8 provinces in Vietnam informed by the results of this feasibility assessment.

Methods: This mixed methods feasibility study was organized using an implementation outcome framework focused on acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility. This study involved three data collection components: (1) usability testing (interviews and focus groups with app user and provider participants who tested VMood in 1 Vietnamese province), (2) app metrics (from the early phase of the randomized controlled trial in the same province but from different municipalities), and (3) discourse data (notes from various team meetings, communications, and reports on VMood's development and implementation). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. App use data were analyzed using basic descriptive statistics.

Results: The findings of the 3 data components showed that there were seven main challenges: (1) challenges with recruitment and uptake of the app, (2) challenges with use and engagement, (3) screening challenges, (4) digital divide, (5) limitations to digital applications for mental health, (6) technological challenges, and (7) funding and policy constraints. Various solutions to help mitigate the challenges were used by the team.

Conclusions: The findings contribute important evidence on the challenges to the development and feasibility assessment of a digital depression app adapted from an in-person intervention in Vietnam. The findings have applicability for others looking to develop and implement digital interventions in similar contexts, serving as a unique opportunity to share the lessons learned regarding the development and testing process.

抑郁症数字心理健康干预(VMood)开发和可行性评估中的挑战和缓解策略:混合方法可行性研究。
背景:在世界范围内,COVID-19大流行加剧了精神卫生保健方面的差距,特别是在越南等低收入和中等收入国家,90%的需求者无法获得护理。随后,智能手机应用程序等数字心理健康干预措施的使用大幅增加。目前,此类干预措施的证据有限,特别是在干预措施采用基于证据的面对面形式的情况下。实施科学旨在促进将科学发现纳入实践。实施成功的关键决定因素是干预措施的可用性。可用性的障碍包括干预太混乱或使用时间太密集。促进因素包括整合更多的参与功能和整合人力支持。目的:本实施科学可行性研究的目的是描述在越南开发的数字抑郁干预(VMood智能手机应用程序)的开发、可用性测试和实施中使用的挑战和缓解策略。VMood改编自加拿大最初开发的基于证据的面对面干预,该干预以认知行为疗法的原则为基础,由非专业健康或社会服务工作者进行支持性指导。根据可行性评估的结果,研究小组目前正在越南8个省份的随机对照试验中测试VMood的有效性和成本效益。方法:采用可接受性、采用性、适当性和可行性为重点的实施结果框架来组织这项混合方法可行性研究。本研究涉及三个数据收集组件:(1)可用性测试(与在越南1个省测试VMood的应用程序用户和提供商参与者进行访谈和焦点小组),(2)应用程序指标(来自同一省但来自不同城市的随机对照试验的早期阶段),以及(3)话语数据(来自各种团队会议,通信和VMood开发和实施报告的记录)。定性数据采用专题内容分析法进行分析。应用程序使用数据采用基本描述性统计进行分析。结果:3个数据组件的研究结果表明,存在七大主要挑战:(1)应用程序的招聘和吸收挑战,(2)使用和参与挑战,(3)筛选挑战,(4)数字鸿沟,(5)心理健康数字应用程序的局限性,(6)技术挑战,(7)资金和政策限制。团队使用了各种解决方案来帮助减轻挑战。结论:这些发现为越南一款基于面对面干预的数字抑郁症应用程序的开发和可行性评估所面临的挑战提供了重要证据。研究结果对其他希望在类似情况下开发和实施数字干预措施的人也具有适用性,这是分享在开发和测试过程中吸取的经验教训的独特机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信