Prophylactic Interventions to Prevent Severe Skin Toxicities in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Nivolumab + Ipilimumab With or Without Chemotherapy.
{"title":"Prophylactic Interventions to Prevent Severe Skin Toxicities in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Nivolumab + Ipilimumab With or Without Chemotherapy.","authors":"Toshiyuki Sumi, Kaori Kanamaru, Shunsuke Tsuji, Masahumi Kagawa, Taiki Ishigooka, Keigo Matsuura, Takumi Ikeda, Yuichi Yamada, Hirofumi Chiba","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The frequent occurrence of immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly dermatologic toxicities, often necessitates treatment modifications and systemic corticosteroid use, negatively affecting patient outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of a multidisciplinary prophylactic intervention on the incidence of severe skin toxicities among patients receiving nivolumab + ipilimumab (NI) with or without chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 154 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC who received NI with or without chemotherapy. A comparison was made between skin toxicities and clinical outcomes before and after the implementation of a prophylactic intervention consisting of physician-prescribed medications, pharmacist-led patient education, and nurse-guided skincare. The primary end points were the incidence of grade 3 or higher skin toxicities, systemic corticosteroid use, and treatment discontinuation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of grade 3 skin toxicities significantly decreased from 21% before the intervention to 8% after the intervention (<i>P</i> = .045). Systemic corticosteroid use and treatment discontinuation rates due to skin toxicities reduced from 36% to 10% (<i>P</i> = .0004) and from 21% to 4% (<i>P</i> = .0012), respectively. Patients with any grade of skin rash exhibited significantly improved PFS and OS compared with those without skin toxicities. However, grade 3 toxicities were associated with poor OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic interventions significantly reduced the severity of skin toxicities and enhanced treatment continuity in patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy. These findings underscore the importance of proactive, multidisciplinary management strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500100"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The frequent occurrence of immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly dermatologic toxicities, often necessitates treatment modifications and systemic corticosteroid use, negatively affecting patient outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of a multidisciplinary prophylactic intervention on the incidence of severe skin toxicities among patients receiving nivolumab + ipilimumab (NI) with or without chemotherapy.
Patients and methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 154 treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC who received NI with or without chemotherapy. A comparison was made between skin toxicities and clinical outcomes before and after the implementation of a prophylactic intervention consisting of physician-prescribed medications, pharmacist-led patient education, and nurse-guided skincare. The primary end points were the incidence of grade 3 or higher skin toxicities, systemic corticosteroid use, and treatment discontinuation. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: The incidence of grade 3 skin toxicities significantly decreased from 21% before the intervention to 8% after the intervention (P = .045). Systemic corticosteroid use and treatment discontinuation rates due to skin toxicities reduced from 36% to 10% (P = .0004) and from 21% to 4% (P = .0012), respectively. Patients with any grade of skin rash exhibited significantly improved PFS and OS compared with those without skin toxicities. However, grade 3 toxicities were associated with poor OS.
Conclusion: Prophylactic interventions significantly reduced the severity of skin toxicities and enhanced treatment continuity in patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy. These findings underscore the importance of proactive, multidisciplinary management strategies to optimize therapeutic outcomes.