Outcomes of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Qi Wang, Xiaoxiang Jiang, Stefano Manodoro, Chaoqin Lin
{"title":"Outcomes of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Qi Wang, Xiaoxiang Jiang, Stefano Manodoro, Chaoqin Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06195-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This systematic review is aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-uterosacral ligament suspension (vNOTES-USLS) based on current evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted for studies published up to 31 December 2024. Original studies on vNOTES-USLS were included, whereas reviews, abstracts, and publications not in the English language were excluded. No restrictions were placed on sample size or publication date.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies with 336 patients met the criteria, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 3 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies. Operative time ranged from 17.4 ± 6.4 to 29.7 ± 8.2 minutes. Hemoglobin reduction varied between 1.12 ± 0.83 and 1.80 ± 1.57 g/dl. Hospital stays ranged from 1.0 ± 0.5 to 3.7 ± 1.1 days. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.1% (7 out of 336), with bladder injury being the most common (3 cases). One patient required conversion to vaginal USLS, but no laparotomy conversions were reported. Ureteral kinking occurred in 1 case (0.3%) and was resolved intraoperatively. Postoperative complications were reported in 7.4% (25 out of 336), with urinary tract infection being the most frequent (10 cases). Over 1-37 months of follow-up, 1 patient required reoperation for anterior prolapse recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>vNOTES-USLS appears to be a promising option for apical prolapse, with favorable short-term outcomes. However, small sample sizes, short follow-ups, and study design variations limit current evidence. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-ups and direct comparisons with established procedures are needed to assess long-term safety and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06195-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: This systematic review is aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-uterosacral ligament suspension (vNOTES-USLS) based on current evidence.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted for studies published up to 31 December 2024. Original studies on vNOTES-USLS were included, whereas reviews, abstracts, and publications not in the English language were excluded. No restrictions were placed on sample size or publication date.

Results: Nine studies with 336 patients met the criteria, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 3 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies. Operative time ranged from 17.4 ± 6.4 to 29.7 ± 8.2 minutes. Hemoglobin reduction varied between 1.12 ± 0.83 and 1.80 ± 1.57 g/dl. Hospital stays ranged from 1.0 ± 0.5 to 3.7 ± 1.1 days. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.1% (7 out of 336), with bladder injury being the most common (3 cases). One patient required conversion to vaginal USLS, but no laparotomy conversions were reported. Ureteral kinking occurred in 1 case (0.3%) and was resolved intraoperatively. Postoperative complications were reported in 7.4% (25 out of 336), with urinary tract infection being the most frequent (10 cases). Over 1-37 months of follow-up, 1 patient required reoperation for anterior prolapse recurrence.

Conclusion: vNOTES-USLS appears to be a promising option for apical prolapse, with favorable short-term outcomes. However, small sample sizes, short follow-ups, and study design variations limit current evidence. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-ups and direct comparisons with established procedures are needed to assess long-term safety and effectiveness.

经阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)治疗子宫骶韧带悬吊根尖室脱垂的疗效:系统综述。
引言和假设:本系统综述旨在基于现有证据评估经阴道自然开口腔内内镜手术-子宫骶韧带悬吊术(vNOTES-USLS)的有效性和安全性。方法:综合检索PubMed和Web of Science,检索截止到2024年12月31日发表的研究。vNOTES-USLS的原始研究被纳入,而非英语的评论、摘要和出版物被排除在外。对样本量或出版日期没有限制。结果:9项研究336例患者符合标准,其中随机对照研究1项,前瞻性研究3项,回顾性研究5项。手术时间17.4±6.4 ~ 29.7±8.2分钟。血红蛋白降低在1.12±0.83和1.80±1.57 g/dl之间变化。住院时间为1.0±0.5 ~ 3.7±1.1天。术中并发症发生率为2.1%(7 / 336),其中膀胱损伤最为常见(3例)。1例患者需要转换为阴道USLS,但没有剖腹手术转换的报道。输尿管扭结1例(0.3%),术中解决。术后并发症发生率为7.4%(336例中有25例),其中尿路感染发生率最高(10例)。随访1 ~ 37个月,有1例因前脱垂复发再次手术。结论:vNOTES-USLS似乎是根尖脱垂的一个有希望的选择,具有良好的短期效果。然而,样本量小,随访时间短,研究设计变化限制了现有的证据。需要更大的前瞻性研究,更长的随访时间,并与既定程序进行直接比较,以评估长期安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信