Impact of Intraoperative Dexamethasone on Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Survival in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S524652
Wenzhi Zhu, Liping Zhu, Xiaoyi Wang, Hongyu Tan
{"title":"Impact of Intraoperative Dexamethasone on Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Survival in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Wenzhi Zhu, Liping Zhu, Xiaoyi Wang, Hongyu Tan","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S524652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the impact of intraoperative dexamethasone on postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with NSCLC who underwent lung resection between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2009, were included. Patients receiving dexamethasone formed the dexamethasone (DXM) group, while those who did not were assigned to the non-dexamethasone (non-DXM) group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize confounding bias. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 579 patients included, 224 received intraoperative DXM, while 355 did not. PSM produced a matched cohort of 400 patients (200 in each group). After matching, the DXM group had significantly lower incidences of postoperative pneumonia (P < 0.05), reduced intensive care unit (ICU) ICU occupancy, and shorter postoperative hospital stays (PHS) compared with the non-DXM group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative DXM use reduced the incidence of postoperative pneumonia, ICU occupancy, and PHS. However, no clear association was found between intraoperative DXM use and long-term survival outcomes in NSCLC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"3347-3361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S524652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the impact of intraoperative dexamethasone on postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing surgery.

Methods: Patients with NSCLC who underwent lung resection between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2009, were included. Patients receiving dexamethasone formed the dexamethasone (DXM) group, while those who did not were assigned to the non-dexamethasone (non-DXM) group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize confounding bias. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative complications.

Results: Of the 579 patients included, 224 received intraoperative DXM, while 355 did not. PSM produced a matched cohort of 400 patients (200 in each group). After matching, the DXM group had significantly lower incidences of postoperative pneumonia (P < 0.05), reduced intensive care unit (ICU) ICU occupancy, and shorter postoperative hospital stays (PHS) compared with the non-DXM group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the groups.

Conclusion: Intraoperative DXM use reduced the incidence of postoperative pneumonia, ICU occupancy, and PHS. However, no clear association was found between intraoperative DXM use and long-term survival outcomes in NSCLC patients.

术中地塞米松对非小细胞肺癌患者术后并发症和长期生存的影响:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究
目的:探讨术中应用地塞米松对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)手术患者术后并发症及长期生存的影响。方法:纳入2006年1月1日至2009年12月31日期间行肺切除术的非小细胞肺癌患者。接受地塞米松治疗的患者分为地塞米松组,未接受地塞米松治疗的患者分为非地塞米松组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来减少混杂偏差。主要终点是术后并发症的发生率。结果:579例患者中,术中接受DXM治疗者224例,未接受DXM治疗者355例。PSM产生了400名患者的匹配队列(每组200名)。配对后,与非DXM组相比,DXM组术后肺炎发生率显著降低(P < 0.05),重症监护病房(ICU)占用率显著降低(P < 0.05),术后住院时间显著缩短(P < 0.05)。两组间总生存期(OS)或无复发生存期(RFS)无显著差异。结论:术中使用DXM可降低术后肺炎发生率、ICU占用率和小灵通发生率。然而,术中使用ddxm与NSCLC患者的长期生存结果之间没有明确的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信