A comparison of organ preservation in older adults with stage I rectal cancer.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annmarie Butare, Scarlett Hao, Anas Taha, Michael Drew Honaker
{"title":"A comparison of organ preservation in older adults with stage I rectal cancer.","authors":"Annmarie Butare, Scarlett Hao, Anas Taha, Michael Drew Honaker","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04940-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the primary recommended treatment for high-risk T1 and T2 rectal cancer. However, growing evidence suggests preoperative therapy may lead to eligibility for organ preservation (OP), avoiding the morbidity of major resection, which may be beneficial in older adults. The primary aim of the study was to compare rates of OP in adults 70 years of age and older to those less than 70 with T1 lesions rectal cancers with high-risk features and T2 rectal cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cohort study of patients with high-risk stage 1 rectal cancer was identified within the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Primary outcome was the association of age with receipt of organ preservation. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine the effect of covariates on the outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 38,714 patients, 34.4% were ≥ 70 years, 42.3% were female, and 75.6% had a Charlson Deyo comorbidity score of 0. Older adults were more likely to received OP compared to younger patients (45.6% vs 30.6%, p < 0.001). This persisted on adjusted analysis (OR 1.9, p < 0.001). Other factors predictive of receiving OP include non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (OR 1.5, p < 0.001), lack of insurance (OR 1.5, p < 0.001), increased comorbidity score (OR 1.7 for CDCC of 3, p < 0.001), treatment at a community facility compared to academic facility (OR 1.4, p < 0.001), and female sex (OR 1.2, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although current guideline recommendations for high-risk T1 and T2 rectal cancer is TME, a significantly higher proportion of older adult patients undergo organ preservation. This is more pronounced in comorbid and disadvantaged patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04940-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the primary recommended treatment for high-risk T1 and T2 rectal cancer. However, growing evidence suggests preoperative therapy may lead to eligibility for organ preservation (OP), avoiding the morbidity of major resection, which may be beneficial in older adults. The primary aim of the study was to compare rates of OP in adults 70 years of age and older to those less than 70 with T1 lesions rectal cancers with high-risk features and T2 rectal cancers.

Methods: A retrospective, cohort study of patients with high-risk stage 1 rectal cancer was identified within the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Primary outcome was the association of age with receipt of organ preservation. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine the effect of covariates on the outcome.

Results: Out of 38,714 patients, 34.4% were ≥ 70 years, 42.3% were female, and 75.6% had a Charlson Deyo comorbidity score of 0. Older adults were more likely to received OP compared to younger patients (45.6% vs 30.6%, p < 0.001). This persisted on adjusted analysis (OR 1.9, p < 0.001). Other factors predictive of receiving OP include non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (OR 1.5, p < 0.001), lack of insurance (OR 1.5, p < 0.001), increased comorbidity score (OR 1.7 for CDCC of 3, p < 0.001), treatment at a community facility compared to academic facility (OR 1.4, p < 0.001), and female sex (OR 1.2, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Although current guideline recommendations for high-risk T1 and T2 rectal cancer is TME, a significantly higher proportion of older adult patients undergo organ preservation. This is more pronounced in comorbid and disadvantaged patients.

老年人I期直肠癌器官保存的比较。
背景:全肠系膜切除(TME)仍然是高危T1和T2直肠癌的主要推荐治疗方法。然而,越来越多的证据表明,术前治疗可能导致器官保存(OP)的资格,避免大切除的发病率,这可能对老年人有益。该研究的主要目的是比较70岁及以上的成年人与70岁以下的T1病变直肠癌伴高危特征和T2直肠癌患者的OP发生率。方法:在国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中对高风险1期直肠癌患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要结果是年龄与接受器官保存的关系。进行多变量分析以检验协变量对结果的影响。结果:38,714例患者中,34.4%年龄≥70岁,42.3%为女性,75.6% Charlson Deyo合并症评分为0。与年轻患者相比,老年人接受OP的可能性更大(45.6% vs 30.6%)。结论:尽管目前的指南建议高危T1和T2直肠癌患者接受TME,但接受器官保存的老年患者比例明显更高。这在合并症和处境不利的患者中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信