Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and pancreatic enzyme supplementation after gastric resection-A scoping review.

IF 2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Suprabhat Giri, Prasanna Gore, Gaurav Khatana, Sridhar Sundaram, Vaishali Bhardwaj
{"title":"Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and pancreatic enzyme supplementation after gastric resection-A scoping review.","authors":"Suprabhat Giri, Prasanna Gore, Gaurav Khatana, Sridhar Sundaram, Vaishali Bhardwaj","doi":"10.1007/s12664-025-01806-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) frequently occurs following gastric resection, although it remains underdiagnosed and insufficiently managed. While pancreatic enzyme supplementation (PES) is the cornerstone of the management of EPI, substantial evidence endorsing its application post-gastric surgery is scarce. This scoping review assesses the occurrence of EPI following gastric resection and the influence of PES in managing these patient populations. All relevant studies related to EPI and PES in patients with gastric resection were reviewed until November 2024. Patient demographics, clinical profiles, method of assessment and prevalence of EPI and the effect of PES were analyzed. Total 14 studies reported EPI after gastric resection and three analyzed the outcome of PES after gastric resection. There was considerable variability in the methodologies employed to evaluate EPI following gastric resection. Earlier studies employed direct tests; however, newer studies have utilized indirect tests, predominantly the fecal elastase test. Both studies employing direct tests indicated an EPI prevalence rate of 100%, whereas those utilizing indirect tests revealed a prevalence rate between 26.8% and 100% (26.8% to 63.8% with fecal elastase). Only four studies reported on the severity of EPI following stomach resection, with significant variability. Lastly, there was a lack of high-quality evidence indicating the benefits of PES following gastric resection. Future studies are needed to develop criteria that facilitate the diagnosis of EPI in individuals who have undergone gastrectomy. Robust clinical trials are necessary to provide definitive proof of PES's efficacy in enhancing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-025-01806-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) frequently occurs following gastric resection, although it remains underdiagnosed and insufficiently managed. While pancreatic enzyme supplementation (PES) is the cornerstone of the management of EPI, substantial evidence endorsing its application post-gastric surgery is scarce. This scoping review assesses the occurrence of EPI following gastric resection and the influence of PES in managing these patient populations. All relevant studies related to EPI and PES in patients with gastric resection were reviewed until November 2024. Patient demographics, clinical profiles, method of assessment and prevalence of EPI and the effect of PES were analyzed. Total 14 studies reported EPI after gastric resection and three analyzed the outcome of PES after gastric resection. There was considerable variability in the methodologies employed to evaluate EPI following gastric resection. Earlier studies employed direct tests; however, newer studies have utilized indirect tests, predominantly the fecal elastase test. Both studies employing direct tests indicated an EPI prevalence rate of 100%, whereas those utilizing indirect tests revealed a prevalence rate between 26.8% and 100% (26.8% to 63.8% with fecal elastase). Only four studies reported on the severity of EPI following stomach resection, with significant variability. Lastly, there was a lack of high-quality evidence indicating the benefits of PES following gastric resection. Future studies are needed to develop criteria that facilitate the diagnosis of EPI in individuals who have undergone gastrectomy. Robust clinical trials are necessary to provide definitive proof of PES's efficacy in enhancing patient outcomes.

胃切除术后外分泌胰功能不全和胰酶补充-范围综述。
外分泌胰腺功能不全(EPI)经常发生在胃切除术后,尽管它仍然未被充分诊断和管理。虽然胰酶补充(PES)是EPI管理的基石,但支持其在胃手术后应用的大量证据很少。本综述评估了胃切除术后EPI的发生以及PES在处理这些患者群体中的影响。截至2024年11月,回顾了胃切除术患者EPI和PES的所有相关研究。分析患者人口统计学、临床资料、EPI的评估方法和流行情况以及PES的效果。共有14项研究报道了胃切除术后EPI, 3项研究分析了胃切除术后PES的结果。在评估胃切除术后EPI的方法上存在相当大的差异。早期的研究采用直接测试;然而,较新的研究已经使用了间接测试,主要是粪便弹性酶测试。采用直接检测的两项研究均表明EPI患病率为100%,而采用间接检测的研究显示EPI患病率在26.8%至100%之间(粪便弹性酶检测为26.8%至63.8%)。只有四项研究报道了胃切除术后EPI的严重程度,且差异很大。最后,缺乏高质量的证据表明胃切除术后PES的益处。未来的研究需要制定标准,以促进胃切除术患者EPI的诊断。有必要进行强有力的临床试验,以提供PES在提高患者预后方面的有效性的明确证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信