Effectiveness of Oral Bupropion and Nortriptyline as an Adjunct Treatment for Reducing the Use of Smokeless Tobacco: A Retrospective Study from a Tobacco Cessation Clinic in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Indian journal of public health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.4103/ijph.ijph_400_24
Aparajita Guin, Hoineiting Rebecca Haokip, Sanjib Bandyopadhyay, Saibal Das, Indranil Saha, Aniruddha Basu, Stuti Bhargava
{"title":"Effectiveness of Oral Bupropion and Nortriptyline as an Adjunct Treatment for Reducing the Use of Smokeless Tobacco: A Retrospective Study from a Tobacco Cessation Clinic in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India.","authors":"Aparajita Guin, Hoineiting Rebecca Haokip, Sanjib Bandyopadhyay, Saibal Das, Indranil Saha, Aniruddha Basu, Stuti Bhargava","doi":"10.4103/ijph.ijph_400_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is supporting evidence on the use of nortriptyline in smoking; however, its effectiveness in smokeless tobacco cessation has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of oral bupropion and nortriptyline in reducing smokeless tobacco use.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 85 smokeless tobacco users who required pharmacotherapy (either bupropion or nortriptyline) in addition to behavioral counseling and standard nicotine replacement therapy were included in the study. The amount of tobacco use and Fagerström test for nicotine dependence (FTND)-smokeless tobacco score were compared at the end of 3 months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 84 patients (92.9% males); 39 (46.4%) received bupropion and 45 (53.6%) received nortriptyline. Of them, 97.4% of patients who received bupropion and 84.4% who received nortriptyline reported reduced usage of smokeless tobacco after treatment (P = 0.06). There was a significant reduction in the average use of smokeless tobacco after treatment as compared to baseline usage among patients who received bupropion (median [Q1-Q3], 360 [150-600] to 8 [0-60]) and nortriptyline (median [Q1-Q3], 90 [0-465] to 0 [0-60]). Similarly, there were significant reductions in the median FTND-smokeless tobacco scores after treatment as compared to baseline scorings among patients who received bupropion (median, 6 [4-7] to 0 [0-0.5]) and nortriptyline (median, 6 [4-8] to 0 [0-0.25]). Both bupropion and nortriptyline were found to be safe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjunct bupropion and nortriptyline were similarly efficacious in reducing smokeless tobacco use. This has clinical significance because nortriptyline is much cheaper than bupropion.</p>","PeriodicalId":13298,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of public health","volume":"69 2","pages":"185-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_400_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is supporting evidence on the use of nortriptyline in smoking; however, its effectiveness in smokeless tobacco cessation has not been studied.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of oral bupropion and nortriptyline in reducing smokeless tobacco use.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 85 smokeless tobacco users who required pharmacotherapy (either bupropion or nortriptyline) in addition to behavioral counseling and standard nicotine replacement therapy were included in the study. The amount of tobacco use and Fagerström test for nicotine dependence (FTND)-smokeless tobacco score were compared at the end of 3 months of treatment.

Results: Among 84 patients (92.9% males); 39 (46.4%) received bupropion and 45 (53.6%) received nortriptyline. Of them, 97.4% of patients who received bupropion and 84.4% who received nortriptyline reported reduced usage of smokeless tobacco after treatment (P = 0.06). There was a significant reduction in the average use of smokeless tobacco after treatment as compared to baseline usage among patients who received bupropion (median [Q1-Q3], 360 [150-600] to 8 [0-60]) and nortriptyline (median [Q1-Q3], 90 [0-465] to 0 [0-60]). Similarly, there were significant reductions in the median FTND-smokeless tobacco scores after treatment as compared to baseline scorings among patients who received bupropion (median, 6 [4-7] to 0 [0-0.5]) and nortriptyline (median, 6 [4-8] to 0 [0-0.25]). Both bupropion and nortriptyline were found to be safe.

Conclusion: Adjunct bupropion and nortriptyline were similarly efficacious in reducing smokeless tobacco use. This has clinical significance because nortriptyline is much cheaper than bupropion.

口服安非他酮和去甲替林作为辅助治疗减少无烟烟草使用的有效性:来自印度东部三级保健医院戒烟诊所的回顾性研究。
背景:有证据支持在吸烟中使用去甲替林;然而,它在无烟戒烟方面的有效性尚未得到研究。目的:本研究的目的是评价口服安非他酮和去甲替林在减少无烟烟草使用方面的有效性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了85例需要药物治疗(安非他酮或去甲替林)以及行为咨询和标准尼古丁替代治疗的无烟烟草使用者。治疗3个月后,比较两组的烟草使用量和Fagerström尼古丁依赖测试(FTND)-无烟烟草评分。结果:84例患者中,男性占92.9%;安非他酮39例(46.4%),去甲替林45例(53.6%)。其中,97.4%接受安非他酮治疗的患者和84.4%接受去甲替林治疗的患者报告治疗后无烟烟草使用减少(P = 0.06)。与接受安非他酮(中位数[Q1-Q3], 360[150-600]至8[0-60])和去甲替林(中位数[Q1-Q3], 90[0-465]至0[0-60])的患者相比,治疗后无烟烟草的平均使用量显著减少。同样,与接受安非他酮(中位数为6[4-7]至0[0-0.5])和去甲替林(中位数为6[4-8]至0[0-0.25])治疗的患者相比,治疗后ftnd -无烟烟草评分中位数显著降低。安非他酮和去甲替林都是安全的。结论:辅助安非他酮和去甲替林在减少无烟烟草使用方面效果相似。这具有临床意义,因为去甲替林比安非他酮便宜得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of public health
Indian journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed international journal published Quarterly by the Indian Public Health Association. It is indexed / abstracted by the major international indexing systems like Index Medicus/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, etc. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles. The Indian Journal of Public Health publishes articles of authors from India and abroad with special emphasis on original research findings that are relevant for developing country perspectives including India. The journal considers publication of articles as original article, review article, special article, brief research article, CME / Education forum, commentary, letters to editor, case series reports, etc. The journal covers population based studies, impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinic-social studies etc., related to any domain and discipline of public health, specially relevant to national priorities, including ethical and social issues. Articles aligned with national health issues and policy implications are prefered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信