Short-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pain sensitivity, emotional and cognitive processes in non-suicidal self-injury: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
General Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/gpsych-2025-102077
Chang Lei, Diyang Qu, Dennis Chong, Yangyang Yi, Weijian Wu, Yiheng Tu, Runsen Chen
{"title":"Short-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pain sensitivity, emotional and cognitive processes in non-suicidal self-injury: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Chang Lei, Diyang Qu, Dennis Chong, Yangyang Yi, Weijian Wu, Yiheng Tu, Runsen Chen","doi":"10.1136/gpsych-2025-102077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain sensitivity is critical for preventing non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) behaviours; however, individuals engaging in such behaviours often exhibit decreased pain sensitivity, which may undermine this natural safeguard. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is a key region involved in pain regulation, and recent approaches using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to target the DLPFC have shown potential for modulating pain processing and restoring normal pain perception for individuals engaging in NSSI behaviours.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to explore the immediate and short-term effects of a single session of tDCS on pain sensitivity in individuals with NSSI, as well as its secondary effects on mood and NSSI-related factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomised, double-blind, parallel, sham-controlled clinical trial, participants with a history of NSSI were randomly assigned to receive either active or sham tDCS. The intervention consisted of a single 20 min tDCS session targeting the left DLPFC. The primary outcome was pain sensitivity, measured by the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and heat pain score (HPS). Secondary and additional outcomes included NSSI urges, NSSI resistance, self-efficacy in resisting NSSI, mood-related variables and exploratory cognitive-affective processes such as rumination, self-criticism and self-perceived pain sensitivity, assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 24 hours, 1 week and 2 weeks follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary outcomes, no significant differences between groups were observed for pain sensitivity (PPT, p<sub>adj</sub>=0.812; HPS, p<sub>adj</sub>=0.608). However, an exploratory sensitivity analysis treating each trial as an individual observation revealed a significant effect on HPS (p<sub>adj</sub>=0.036). For the secondary and additional outcomes, although there were initial improvements in joyful feelings and reductions in negative affect at 2 weeks post-intervention, these effects did not remain significant after multiple comparison corrections. Notably, reductions in rumination were statistically significant at both 1-week and 2-week follow-ups (1 week, p<sub>adj</sub>=0.040; 2 weeks, p<sub>adj</sub>=0.042). There were no significant effects on NSSI urges, NSSI resistance, self-efficacy in resisting NSSI or self-criticism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single session of tDCS over the left DLPFC did not produce significant changes in pain sensitivity in individuals with NSSI. A sensitivity analysis indicated an effect on heat pain sensitivity, possibly reflecting changes in brain activity, warranting confirmation through neuroimaging. These findings suggest that tDCS warrants further investigation for its potential to influence pain-related cognitive-affective processes in individuals with NSSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12549,"journal":{"name":"General Psychiatry","volume":"38 3","pages":"e102077"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2025-102077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain sensitivity is critical for preventing non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) behaviours; however, individuals engaging in such behaviours often exhibit decreased pain sensitivity, which may undermine this natural safeguard. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is a key region involved in pain regulation, and recent approaches using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to target the DLPFC have shown potential for modulating pain processing and restoring normal pain perception for individuals engaging in NSSI behaviours.

Aims: This study aimed to explore the immediate and short-term effects of a single session of tDCS on pain sensitivity in individuals with NSSI, as well as its secondary effects on mood and NSSI-related factors.

Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, parallel, sham-controlled clinical trial, participants with a history of NSSI were randomly assigned to receive either active or sham tDCS. The intervention consisted of a single 20 min tDCS session targeting the left DLPFC. The primary outcome was pain sensitivity, measured by the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and heat pain score (HPS). Secondary and additional outcomes included NSSI urges, NSSI resistance, self-efficacy in resisting NSSI, mood-related variables and exploratory cognitive-affective processes such as rumination, self-criticism and self-perceived pain sensitivity, assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 24 hours, 1 week and 2 weeks follow-ups.

Results: For the primary outcomes, no significant differences between groups were observed for pain sensitivity (PPT, padj=0.812; HPS, padj=0.608). However, an exploratory sensitivity analysis treating each trial as an individual observation revealed a significant effect on HPS (padj=0.036). For the secondary and additional outcomes, although there were initial improvements in joyful feelings and reductions in negative affect at 2 weeks post-intervention, these effects did not remain significant after multiple comparison corrections. Notably, reductions in rumination were statistically significant at both 1-week and 2-week follow-ups (1 week, padj=0.040; 2 weeks, padj=0.042). There were no significant effects on NSSI urges, NSSI resistance, self-efficacy in resisting NSSI or self-criticism.

Conclusions: A single session of tDCS over the left DLPFC did not produce significant changes in pain sensitivity in individuals with NSSI. A sensitivity analysis indicated an effect on heat pain sensitivity, possibly reflecting changes in brain activity, warranting confirmation through neuroimaging. These findings suggest that tDCS warrants further investigation for its potential to influence pain-related cognitive-affective processes in individuals with NSSI.

经颅直流电刺激对非自杀性自伤患者疼痛敏感性、情绪和认知过程的短期影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:疼痛敏感性是预防非自杀性自伤行为的关键;然而,从事此类行为的个体往往表现出疼痛敏感性降低,这可能会破坏这种自然保护。背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)是参与疼痛调节的关键区域,最近使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)靶向DLPFC的方法已经显示出调节疼痛加工和恢复参与自伤行为的个体正常疼痛感知的潜力。目的:本研究旨在探讨单次tDCS对自伤个体疼痛敏感性的即时和短期影响,以及其对情绪和自伤相关因素的继发影响。方法:在这项随机、双盲、平行、假对照的临床试验中,有自伤史的参与者被随机分配接受主动或假tDCS。干预包括针对左侧DLPFC的单次20分钟tDCS会话。主要终点是疼痛敏感性,通过压痛阈值(PPT)和热痛评分(HPS)来衡量。次要和附加结果包括自伤冲动、自伤抵抗、抵抗自伤的自我效能、情绪相关变量和探索性认知情感过程,如反刍、自我批评和自我感知的疼痛敏感性,在基线、干预后立即、24小时、1周和2周随访时进行评估。结果:在主要结局中,两组间疼痛敏感性差异无统计学意义(PPT, padj=0.812;HPS, padj = 0.608)。然而,将每个试验视为单个观察的探索性敏感性分析显示,对HPS有显著影响(padj=0.036)。对于次要和额外的结果,尽管在干预后2周,快乐感觉有初步的改善,消极情绪有所减少,但在多次比较修正后,这些效果并不显着。值得注意的是,在1周和2周的随访中,反刍行为的减少具有统计学意义(1周,padj=0.040;2周,padj=0.042)。对自伤冲动、自伤抵抗、抗自伤自我效能感和自我批评均无显著影响。结论:单次在左侧DLPFC上进行tDCS不会对自伤患者的疼痛敏感性产生显著变化。敏感性分析表明,对热痛敏感性有影响,可能反映了大脑活动的变化,需要通过神经成像来证实。这些发现表明,tDCS对自伤患者疼痛相关认知情感过程的潜在影响值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General Psychiatry
General Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
848
期刊介绍: General Psychiatry (GPSYCH), an open-access journal established in 1959, has been a pioneer in disseminating leading psychiatry research. Addressing a global audience of psychiatrists and mental health professionals, the journal covers diverse topics and publishes original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, forums on topical issues, case reports, research methods in psychiatry, and a distinctive section on 'Biostatistics in Psychiatry'. The scope includes original articles on basic research, clinical research, community-based studies, and ecological studies, encompassing a broad spectrum of psychiatric interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信