Reassessing the relationship between major depressive disorder and blood lipids: a comprehensive Mendelian randomisation study.

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
General Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/gpsych-2024-101900
Genmin Sun, Disong Xia, Baiqiang Xue, Xuemin Jian, Lixia Peng, Baokun Wang, Chuanhong Wu, Chengwen Gao, Lin He, Yifeng Xu, Xiangzhong Zhao, Qian Zhang, Hui Cao, Yanqin Wen, Yongyong Shi, James B Potash, Jianhua Chen, Zhiqiang Li
{"title":"Reassessing the relationship between major depressive disorder and blood lipids: a comprehensive Mendelian randomisation study.","authors":"Genmin Sun, Disong Xia, Baiqiang Xue, Xuemin Jian, Lixia Peng, Baokun Wang, Chuanhong Wu, Chengwen Gao, Lin He, Yifeng Xu, Xiangzhong Zhao, Qian Zhang, Hui Cao, Yanqin Wen, Yongyong Shi, James B Potash, Jianhua Chen, Zhiqiang Li","doi":"10.1136/gpsych-2024-101900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated that a considerable proportion of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently exhibit pronounced dyslipidaemia. However, the causal dynamics between MDD and dyslipidaemia remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To comprehensively disentangle the genetic causality between MDD and various phenotypes of blood lipids, thereby facilitating the advancement of management strategies for these conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-sample univariable Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using different models, including the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method and causal analysis using the summary effect (CAUSE) estimates, as well as a multivariable MR analysis. This analysis used summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of MDD and five lipid traits: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglycerides (TG), encompassing 5 237 893 individuals of European and East Asian ancestries. For MDD, a total of 598 701 individuals were included, with 500 199 individuals of European ancestry (N<sub>case</sub>=170 756, N<sub>control</sub>=329 443) and 98 502 of East Asian ancestry (N<sub>case</sub>=12 588, N<sub>control</sub>=85 914). Lipid data were collected from 4 639 192 individuals through the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (European, N=4 096 085; East Asian, N=543 107). Next, we used the two-step MR to explore the mediating factors between MDD and TG, and the risk factors affecting TG through MDD. Finally, we conducted a GWAS meta-analysis and enrichment analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In univariable MR, we observed a negative causal effect of low-density lipoprotein on MDD in both European populations (IVW: odds ratio (OR): 0.972, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.947 to 0.998, p=0.037) and East Asian populations (IVW: OR: 0.928, 95% CI 0.864 to 0.997, p=0.042). Additionally, we identified a bidirectional causal relationship between TG and MDD, with TG having a causal effect on MDD (IVW: OR: 1.052, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.085, p=0.001) and MDD having a causal effect on TG (IVW: OR: 1.075, 95% CI 1.047 to 1.104, p<0.001). Multivariable MR analysis further supported the role of TG in MDD (OR: 1.205, 95% CI 1.034 to 1.405, p=0.017). CAUSE estimates indicated that the causal model of MDD on TG provided a better fit than the sharing model (p=0.003), while the association of TG on MDD was more likely due to horizontal correlated pleiotropy than causality. Mediation analyses revealed that waist-hip ratio (WHR) mediated 69% of the total causal effect of MDD on TG, while other identified risk factors exhibited lower mediating proportions either mediated through MDD (≤17%) or originating from MDD (≤29%). The GWAS meta-analysis highlighted potential pathways related to lipid processes and nucleosome assembling, with significant cell types identified in brain regions and liver tissues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that genetic proxies of MDD are associated with elevated levels of TG, with WHR serving as a clinical indicator of the association. This suggests that interventions targeting WHR may be effective in reducing TG levels in patients with MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12549,"journal":{"name":"General Psychiatry","volume":"38 3","pages":"e101900"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2024-101900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated that a considerable proportion of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently exhibit pronounced dyslipidaemia. However, the causal dynamics between MDD and dyslipidaemia remain elusive.

Aims: To comprehensively disentangle the genetic causality between MDD and various phenotypes of blood lipids, thereby facilitating the advancement of management strategies for these conditions.

Methods: We conducted a two-sample univariable Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using different models, including the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method and causal analysis using the summary effect (CAUSE) estimates, as well as a multivariable MR analysis. This analysis used summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of MDD and five lipid traits: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglycerides (TG), encompassing 5 237 893 individuals of European and East Asian ancestries. For MDD, a total of 598 701 individuals were included, with 500 199 individuals of European ancestry (Ncase=170 756, Ncontrol=329 443) and 98 502 of East Asian ancestry (Ncase=12 588, Ncontrol=85 914). Lipid data were collected from 4 639 192 individuals through the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (European, N=4 096 085; East Asian, N=543 107). Next, we used the two-step MR to explore the mediating factors between MDD and TG, and the risk factors affecting TG through MDD. Finally, we conducted a GWAS meta-analysis and enrichment analysis.

Results: In univariable MR, we observed a negative causal effect of low-density lipoprotein on MDD in both European populations (IVW: odds ratio (OR): 0.972, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.947 to 0.998, p=0.037) and East Asian populations (IVW: OR: 0.928, 95% CI 0.864 to 0.997, p=0.042). Additionally, we identified a bidirectional causal relationship between TG and MDD, with TG having a causal effect on MDD (IVW: OR: 1.052, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.085, p=0.001) and MDD having a causal effect on TG (IVW: OR: 1.075, 95% CI 1.047 to 1.104, p<0.001). Multivariable MR analysis further supported the role of TG in MDD (OR: 1.205, 95% CI 1.034 to 1.405, p=0.017). CAUSE estimates indicated that the causal model of MDD on TG provided a better fit than the sharing model (p=0.003), while the association of TG on MDD was more likely due to horizontal correlated pleiotropy than causality. Mediation analyses revealed that waist-hip ratio (WHR) mediated 69% of the total causal effect of MDD on TG, while other identified risk factors exhibited lower mediating proportions either mediated through MDD (≤17%) or originating from MDD (≤29%). The GWAS meta-analysis highlighted potential pathways related to lipid processes and nucleosome assembling, with significant cell types identified in brain regions and liver tissues.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that genetic proxies of MDD are associated with elevated levels of TG, with WHR serving as a clinical indicator of the association. This suggests that interventions targeting WHR may be effective in reducing TG levels in patients with MDD.

重新评估重度抑郁症与血脂之间的关系:一项全面的孟德尔随机研究。
背景:大量研究一致表明,相当比例的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者经常表现出明显的血脂异常。然而,重度抑郁症和血脂异常之间的因果关系仍然难以捉摸。目的:全面解开MDD与血脂各种表型之间的遗传因果关系,从而促进这些疾病的管理策略的推进。方法:我们使用不同的模型进行了双样本单变量孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,包括反方差加权(IVW)方法和使用总结效应(CAUSE)估计的因果分析,以及多变量MR分析。该分析使用了MDD和5个脂质性状(低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、总胆固醇和甘油三酯(TG))的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总统计数据,涵盖了5 237 893名欧洲和东亚祖先。MDD共纳入598 701人,其中欧洲血统500 199人(Ncase=170 756, Ncontrol=329 443),东亚血统98 502人(Ncase=12 588, Ncontrol=85 914)。脂质数据通过全球脂质遗传联盟(European, N=4 096 085;东亚,N=543 107)。接下来,我们使用两步MR来探索MDD与TG之间的中介因素,以及通过MDD影响TG的危险因素。最后,我们进行了GWAS荟萃分析和富集分析。结果:在单变量MR中,我们观察到低密度脂蛋白对欧洲人群(IVW:比值比(OR): 0.972, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.947至0.998,p=0.037)和东亚人群(IVW: OR: 0.928, 95% CI 0.864至0.997,p=0.042)的MDD有负因果效应。此外,我们确定了TG和MDD之间的双向因果关系,TG对MDD有因果影响(IVW: OR: 1.052, 95% CI 1.020至1.085,p=0.001),而MDD对TG有因果影响(IVW: OR: 1.075, 95% CI 1.047至1.104,p)。结论:研究结果表明MDD的遗传代用物与TG水平升高有关,WHR可作为相关性的临床指标。这表明针对WHR的干预措施可能有效降低重度抑郁症患者的TG水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General Psychiatry
General Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
848
期刊介绍: General Psychiatry (GPSYCH), an open-access journal established in 1959, has been a pioneer in disseminating leading psychiatry research. Addressing a global audience of psychiatrists and mental health professionals, the journal covers diverse topics and publishes original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, forums on topical issues, case reports, research methods in psychiatry, and a distinctive section on 'Biostatistics in Psychiatry'. The scope includes original articles on basic research, clinical research, community-based studies, and ecological studies, encompassing a broad spectrum of psychiatric interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信