Achilles Tendon Scraping With Plantaris Tendon Removal for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114251346791
Jimmy Wen, Meraj Alam, Romteen Sedighi, Burhaan Syed, Ramy Khalil, Mouhamad Shehabat, Bethany Joy, Daniel Razick, Adam Razick, Eldo Frezza
{"title":"Achilles Tendon Scraping With Plantaris Tendon Removal for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Jimmy Wen, Meraj Alam, Romteen Sedighi, Burhaan Syed, Ramy Khalil, Mouhamad Shehabat, Bethany Joy, Daniel Razick, Adam Razick, Eldo Frezza","doi":"10.1177/24730114251346791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achilles tendinopathy (AT) patients who are refractory or have a suboptimal response to traditional tendon loading rehabilitation may have an additional component of pain with the plantaris tendon. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of Achilles tendon scraping (ATS) and plantaris tendon removal (PTR) for AT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies reporting on concurrent ATS with PTR for AT. Study variables included the number of patients, mean age, mean follow-up time, return to activity (RTA) or sport (RTS), pre- and postintervention patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications. A meta-analysis was performed for pre- and postintervention Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies including 235 patients (291 tendons) with a mean age of 40.8 years (27.2-52) and a mean follow-up time of 23.2 months (6-69.6) were analyzed. Mean preoperative score VISA-A (5 studies), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (2 studies) were 43.4 (0-74.1) and 6.6 (5.8-7.4), respectively. RTA (1 study) and RTS (4 studies) were 100% and 95.5%. Mean postoperative VISA-A and VAS scores were 92.7 (61-100) and 0.8 (0.8-0.8). Pooled VISA-A mean differences were statistically significant at 43.6 (95% CI: 41.0-46.3, <i>P</i> < .00001). The complication and revision rates were 11 (3.8%) and 5 (1.7%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ATS with PTR demonstrated promising preliminary results, with improved postoperative PROs, high reported rates of RTA/RTS, and low complication and revision rates. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited available evidence and high study heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"10 2","pages":"24730114251346791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114251346791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achilles tendinopathy (AT) patients who are refractory or have a suboptimal response to traditional tendon loading rehabilitation may have an additional component of pain with the plantaris tendon. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of Achilles tendon scraping (ATS) and plantaris tendon removal (PTR) for AT.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies reporting on concurrent ATS with PTR for AT. Study variables included the number of patients, mean age, mean follow-up time, return to activity (RTA) or sport (RTS), pre- and postintervention patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications. A meta-analysis was performed for pre- and postintervention Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) scores.

Results: Seven studies including 235 patients (291 tendons) with a mean age of 40.8 years (27.2-52) and a mean follow-up time of 23.2 months (6-69.6) were analyzed. Mean preoperative score VISA-A (5 studies), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (2 studies) were 43.4 (0-74.1) and 6.6 (5.8-7.4), respectively. RTA (1 study) and RTS (4 studies) were 100% and 95.5%. Mean postoperative VISA-A and VAS scores were 92.7 (61-100) and 0.8 (0.8-0.8). Pooled VISA-A mean differences were statistically significant at 43.6 (95% CI: 41.0-46.3, P < .00001). The complication and revision rates were 11 (3.8%) and 5 (1.7%), respectively.

Conclusion: ATS with PTR demonstrated promising preliminary results, with improved postoperative PROs, high reported rates of RTA/RTS, and low complication and revision rates. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited available evidence and high study heterogeneity.

跟腱刮擦与跖腱去除治疗跟腱病:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:顽固性跟腱病(AT)患者或对传统肌腱负荷康复反应不佳的患者可能有跖腱疼痛的附加成分。本系统综述旨在评价跟腱刮除(ATS)联合plantaris肌腱去除(PTR)治疗AT的疗效和安全性。方法:根据PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆的系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对AT并发ATS与PTR的研究进行系统评价。研究变量包括患者人数、平均年龄、平均随访时间、恢复活动(RTA)或运动(RTS)、干预前和干预后患者报告的结果(PROs)和并发症。对干预前和干预后的维多利亚运动评估协会跟腱(VISA-A)评分进行meta分析。结果:共纳入7项研究,共纳入235例患者(291根肌腱),平均年龄40.8岁(27.2-52岁),平均随访时间23.2个月(6-69.6个月)。术前平均评分VISA-A(5项研究)和视觉模拟评分VAS(2项研究)分别为43.4(0-74.1)和6.6(5.8-7.4)。RTA(1项研究)和RTS(4项研究)分别为100%和95.5%。术后平均VISA-A和VAS评分分别为92.7(61-100)和0.8(0.8-0.8)。合并VISA-A平均差异有统计学意义,为43.6 (95% CI: 41.0-46.3, P)。结论:ATS合并PTR的初步结果令人鼓舞,术后PROs改善,RTA/RTS报告率高,并发症和翻修率低。鉴于现有证据有限和研究异质性高,这些发现应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信