Feasibility of a beat-by-beat finger photoplethysmograph device for estimating central (aortic) blood pressure waveform characteristics.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Bryce N Balmain, Martin G Schultz, Norman R Morris, Kenji Shiino, Surendran Sabapathy
{"title":"Feasibility of a beat-by-beat finger photoplethysmograph device for estimating central (aortic) blood pressure waveform characteristics.","authors":"Bryce N Balmain, Martin G Schultz, Norman R Morris, Kenji Shiino, Surendran Sabapathy","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05862-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central blood pressure can be estimated non-invasively using radial applanation tonometry. However, the stability and accuracy of applanation tonometry signals is operator-dependent. We examined the concordance between finger and radial artery pressure waveforms captured using an automated, beat-by-beat, photoplethysmograph device (Finometer PRO) and radial applanation tonometry respectively, to estimate central pressure waveform characteristics including systolic (SP), diastolic (DP), augmented (AP), reservoir (RP), and excess (XSP) pressure at rest and during a period of elevated and sustained arterial blood pressure. The central pressure waveform characteristics were estimated from finger artery pressure waveforms captured by the Finometer, and were compared to those derived from radial artery pressure waveforms captured using applanation tonometry at baseline (Rest) and during a brief period of circulatory occlusion (OCC) immediately following an isometric handgrip exercise challenge (performed at 40% maximal voluntary contraction) in 24 healthy men (25 ± 5 years). Central pressure waveform parameters derived from the Finometer device were not different to those estimated from radial applanation tonometry: SP (Rest: 3 ± 2; OCC: 4 ± 2 mmHg), DP (Rest: 1 ± 1; OCC 1 ± 2 mmHg), AP (Rest:2 ± 3; OCC: 3 ± 3 mmHg), RP (Rest: 3 ± 4; OCC: 3 ± 5 mmHg), and XSP (Rest: 2 ± 2; OCC: 2 ± 3 mmHg) (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, intra-class correlation coefficients between methods were uniformly high for the estimated change from Rest-to-OCC in all parameters: SP (r = 0.97), DP (r = 0.96), AP (r = 0.94), RP (r = 0.95), and XSP (Rest: r = 0.98) (all p < 0.01). These findings demonstrate that the Finometer device may serve as an alternative automated device to radial applanation tonometry for capturing peripheral pressure waveforms that allow similar estimation of central pressure waveform characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05862-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central blood pressure can be estimated non-invasively using radial applanation tonometry. However, the stability and accuracy of applanation tonometry signals is operator-dependent. We examined the concordance between finger and radial artery pressure waveforms captured using an automated, beat-by-beat, photoplethysmograph device (Finometer PRO) and radial applanation tonometry respectively, to estimate central pressure waveform characteristics including systolic (SP), diastolic (DP), augmented (AP), reservoir (RP), and excess (XSP) pressure at rest and during a period of elevated and sustained arterial blood pressure. The central pressure waveform characteristics were estimated from finger artery pressure waveforms captured by the Finometer, and were compared to those derived from radial artery pressure waveforms captured using applanation tonometry at baseline (Rest) and during a brief period of circulatory occlusion (OCC) immediately following an isometric handgrip exercise challenge (performed at 40% maximal voluntary contraction) in 24 healthy men (25 ± 5 years). Central pressure waveform parameters derived from the Finometer device were not different to those estimated from radial applanation tonometry: SP (Rest: 3 ± 2; OCC: 4 ± 2 mmHg), DP (Rest: 1 ± 1; OCC 1 ± 2 mmHg), AP (Rest:2 ± 3; OCC: 3 ± 3 mmHg), RP (Rest: 3 ± 4; OCC: 3 ± 5 mmHg), and XSP (Rest: 2 ± 2; OCC: 2 ± 3 mmHg) (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, intra-class correlation coefficients between methods were uniformly high for the estimated change from Rest-to-OCC in all parameters: SP (r = 0.97), DP (r = 0.96), AP (r = 0.94), RP (r = 0.95), and XSP (Rest: r = 0.98) (all p < 0.01). These findings demonstrate that the Finometer device may serve as an alternative automated device to radial applanation tonometry for capturing peripheral pressure waveforms that allow similar estimation of central pressure waveform characteristics.

一种用于估计中央(主动脉)血压波形特征的逐拍手指光电容积描记仪的可行性。
中心血压可以用径向压平测压法无创测量。然而,压平血压计信号的稳定性和准确性依赖于算子。我们分别使用自动、逐拍、光容积描记仪(Finometer PRO)和径向压测仪检测了手指和桡动脉压力波形之间的一致性,以估计中心压力波形特征,包括静息时和动脉血压升高和持续期间的收缩压(SP)、舒张压(DP)、增强压(AP)、储压(RP)和过量压(XSP)。通过Finometer捕获的手指动脉压力波形估计中心压力波形特征,并将其与24名健康男性(25±5岁)在基线(休息)和在短时间内循环闭塞(OCC)后立即进行等长握力锻炼(以40%最大自愿收缩进行)时使用压平血压计捕获的桡动脉压力波形进行比较。Finometer装置测得的中心压力波形参数与径向压平测得的中心压力波形参数无差异:SP (Rest: 3±2;OCC: 4±2mmhg), DP(休息:1±1;OCC 1±2mmhg), AP(休息:2±3;OCC: 3±3mmhg), RP(休息:3±4;OCC: 3±5 mmHg), XSP(休息:2±2;OCC: 2±3mmhg) (p < 0.05)。此外,所有参数(SP (r = 0.97)、DP (r = 0.96)、AP (r = 0.94)、RP (r = 0.95)和XSP (Rest: r = 0.98))从Rest到occ的估计变化,方法之间的类内相关系数都一致较高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信