{"title":"Mind the gap: a nested randomised pilot study of culturally inclusive, internet-delivered prolonged exposure for PTSD among immigrants.","authors":"Olof Molander, Karoline Kolaas, Nitya Jayaram-Lindström, Moa Pontén, Josefin Särnholm, Maria Bragesjö","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2520637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> PTSD is disproportionately prevalent among immigrants in Sweden, yet access to evidence-based treatments remains limited, especially for those facing language barriers. Internet-delivered prolonged exposure (I-PE) may help overcome these challenges, but its feasibility and effectiveness in diverse populations remain underexplored.<b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a culturally inclusive, therapist-guided I-PE programme in easy-to-read English for immigrants with PTSD.<b>Method</b>: A nested pilot study within an ongoing RCT randomised 30 participants to I-PE or a waitlist control. The intervention incorporated simplified language, diverse visual representations, and a user-friendly platform. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, adherence, and retention. Acceptability was assessed through satisfaction, adverse effects, and cultural appropriateness, while preliminary efficacy was evaluated via PTSD symptom severity and secondary measures of depression.<b>Results:</b> Recruitment was completed in six weeks, with moderate to high retention. Adherence was strong, with 63% completing at least five I-PE modules. Participants rated the intervention as highly acceptable, with no major cultural barriers. The easy-to-read English format was well received, with no reported linguistic accessibility issues. No serious adverse events were reported. PTSD symptoms significantly decreased in the I-PE group (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.45; <i>p</i> < .001), with moderate reductions in depression (Cohen's <i>d</i> = .80; <i>p</i> < .01).<b>Conclusions:</b> The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally inclusive, therapist-guided I-PE programme for PTSD among immigrants. The participants perceived the I-PE as helpful, trustworthy, and easy to use, with no suggestions for further cultural modifications or reports of cultural inappropriateness. However, the sample's relatively high English proficiency and education may limit generalizability to other groups who have migrated to Sweden. A full-scale randomised controlled trial is needed to assess clinical and cost-effectiveness, as well as implementation across more diverse immigrant populations.<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06193161..</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2520637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2520637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: PTSD is disproportionately prevalent among immigrants in Sweden, yet access to evidence-based treatments remains limited, especially for those facing language barriers. Internet-delivered prolonged exposure (I-PE) may help overcome these challenges, but its feasibility and effectiveness in diverse populations remain underexplored.Objective: This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a culturally inclusive, therapist-guided I-PE programme in easy-to-read English for immigrants with PTSD.Method: A nested pilot study within an ongoing RCT randomised 30 participants to I-PE or a waitlist control. The intervention incorporated simplified language, diverse visual representations, and a user-friendly platform. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, adherence, and retention. Acceptability was assessed through satisfaction, adverse effects, and cultural appropriateness, while preliminary efficacy was evaluated via PTSD symptom severity and secondary measures of depression.Results: Recruitment was completed in six weeks, with moderate to high retention. Adherence was strong, with 63% completing at least five I-PE modules. Participants rated the intervention as highly acceptable, with no major cultural barriers. The easy-to-read English format was well received, with no reported linguistic accessibility issues. No serious adverse events were reported. PTSD symptoms significantly decreased in the I-PE group (Cohen's d = 1.45; p < .001), with moderate reductions in depression (Cohen's d = .80; p < .01).Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally inclusive, therapist-guided I-PE programme for PTSD among immigrants. The participants perceived the I-PE as helpful, trustworthy, and easy to use, with no suggestions for further cultural modifications or reports of cultural inappropriateness. However, the sample's relatively high English proficiency and education may limit generalizability to other groups who have migrated to Sweden. A full-scale randomised controlled trial is needed to assess clinical and cost-effectiveness, as well as implementation across more diverse immigrant populations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06193161..
背景:PTSD在瑞典的移民中非常普遍,但获得循证治疗的机会仍然有限,特别是对那些有语言障碍的人。互联网提供的长时间暴露(I-PE)可能有助于克服这些挑战,但其在不同人群中的可行性和有效性仍未得到充分探索。目的:本研究评估文化包容性、治疗师指导的易读英语I-PE项目对创伤后应激障碍移民的可行性、可接受性和初步效果。方法:在一项正在进行的随机对照试验中,随机选取30名参与者进行I-PE或候补对照。干预措施包括简化的语言,多样化的视觉表现和用户友好的平台。可行性结果包括招募、依从性和留任。可接受性通过满意度、不良反应和文化适宜性来评估,而初步疗效通过PTSD症状严重程度和次要抑郁指标来评估。结果:招募在6周内完成,有中高保留率。依从性很强,63%的患者完成了至少5个I-PE模块。参与者认为干预是高度可接受的,没有主要的文化障碍。易于阅读的英文格式很受欢迎,没有报告语言可访问性问题。无严重不良事件报告。I-PE组PTSD症状显著减轻(Cohen’s d = 1.45;p d = 0.80;结论:研究结果支持了文化包容性、治疗师指导的移民PTSD I-PE项目的可行性和可接受性。参与者认为I-PE是有用的,值得信赖的,易于使用的,没有建议进一步的文化修改或文化不适当的报告。然而,样本的相对较高的英语熟练程度和教育程度可能限制了对其他移民到瑞典的群体的推广。需要一项全面的随机对照试验来评估临床和成本效益,以及在更多样化的移民人群中实施。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06193161。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.