Respiratory Clinicians' Views on Offering "Rescue Packs" to Patients Discharged After COPD Exacerbation: Qualitative Interview Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Karolina Kuberska, Graham Martin, John R Hurst, Mona Bafadhel
{"title":"Respiratory Clinicians' Views on Offering \"Rescue Packs\" to Patients Discharged After COPD Exacerbation: Qualitative Interview Study.","authors":"Karolina Kuberska, Graham Martin, John R Hurst, Mona Bafadhel","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2025.2524346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Rescue packs\" for COPD exacerbations, consisting of a course of antibiotics and steroids, have become part of self-management strategies for many patients living with COPD. Currently, in the UK, rescue packs are guideline-recommended but not routinely offered on hospital discharge. They are, however, commonly prescribed by primary care teams. This study examined hospital-based respiratory clinicians' views on offering patients rescue packs following hospitalisation for COPD exacerbations. We conducted 24 individual and joint semi-structured interviews <i>via</i> telephone or videocall with 30 clinicians (respiratory consultants, respiratory registrars and specialist nurses) in 20 UK hospitals to understand variation in practice around, and views on, offering rescue packs to discharged COPD patients. Interview data were analysed using the constant comparative method. Clinicians' views on offering rescue packs were a mixture of concerns and recognition of potential benefits. Concerns included antimicrobial resistance, individual overuse of antibiotics, and potential side effects of steroids, especially in patients with poorer understanding of their own condition, with lower self-management skills, or who found it difficult to access primary care. Recognised benefits included the potential to prevent future exacerbations, empowering patients by supporting COPD self-management, and circumventing the difficulties of securing an urgent primary care appointment. There was a consensus that supporting patients in self-management of COPD was key to effective care. Given the increasing role of self-management for patients living with COPD, it is vital to ensure that patients are able to appropriately use rescue packs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"22 1","pages":"2524346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2025.2524346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Rescue packs" for COPD exacerbations, consisting of a course of antibiotics and steroids, have become part of self-management strategies for many patients living with COPD. Currently, in the UK, rescue packs are guideline-recommended but not routinely offered on hospital discharge. They are, however, commonly prescribed by primary care teams. This study examined hospital-based respiratory clinicians' views on offering patients rescue packs following hospitalisation for COPD exacerbations. We conducted 24 individual and joint semi-structured interviews via telephone or videocall with 30 clinicians (respiratory consultants, respiratory registrars and specialist nurses) in 20 UK hospitals to understand variation in practice around, and views on, offering rescue packs to discharged COPD patients. Interview data were analysed using the constant comparative method. Clinicians' views on offering rescue packs were a mixture of concerns and recognition of potential benefits. Concerns included antimicrobial resistance, individual overuse of antibiotics, and potential side effects of steroids, especially in patients with poorer understanding of their own condition, with lower self-management skills, or who found it difficult to access primary care. Recognised benefits included the potential to prevent future exacerbations, empowering patients by supporting COPD self-management, and circumventing the difficulties of securing an urgent primary care appointment. There was a consensus that supporting patients in self-management of COPD was key to effective care. Given the increasing role of self-management for patients living with COPD, it is vital to ensure that patients are able to appropriately use rescue packs.

呼吸内科医生对COPD急性加重出院患者提供“抢救包”的看法:质性访谈研究
针对慢性阻塞性肺病恶化的“救援包”,包括一个疗程的抗生素和类固醇,已成为许多慢性阻塞性肺病患者自我管理策略的一部分。目前,在英国,急救包是指南推荐的,但在出院时通常不提供。然而,它们通常由初级保健团队开处方。本研究调查了医院呼吸系统临床医生在COPD加重住院后为患者提供救援包的观点。我们通过电话或视频电话对20家英国医院的30名临床医生(呼吸咨询师、呼吸登记员和专科护士)进行了24次单独和联合半结构化访谈,以了解为出院COPD患者提供急救包的实践变化和观点。访谈资料采用恒常比较法进行分析。临床医生对提供抢救包的看法是担忧和认识到潜在的好处。人们关注的问题包括抗菌素耐药性、抗生素的个人过度使用和类固醇的潜在副作用,特别是对自身病情了解较差、自我管理技能较低或难以获得初级保健的患者。公认的益处包括预防未来恶化的潜力,通过支持COPD自我管理赋予患者权力,以及规避获得紧急初级保健预约的困难。支持患者自我管理COPD是有效治疗的关键,这是一个共识。鉴于自我管理对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的作用越来越大,确保患者能够适当使用急救包至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信