[Status, classification, and potential of implementation research: an inventory for public health in Germany].

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Heide Weishaar, Anna Kuehne, Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Hajo Zeeb
{"title":"[Status, classification, and potential of implementation research: an inventory for public health in Germany].","authors":"Heide Weishaar, Anna Kuehne, Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Hajo Zeeb","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04077-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of high-quality, evidence-based practice to improve the health of populations is a prerequisite and a core element of public health. However, gaps frequently exist between research and practice, leading to the underuse of effective interventions and misuse of inappropriate interventions. Implementation science aims to bridge the gap between knowledge production and implementation by generating evidence to improve the transfer of research findings and evidence-based practices into routine action. This discussion article reflects on the state of implementation science in Germany. First, we provide a descriptive classification of implementation science, followed by a review of selected theories, models, and frameworks that are used in implementation research to systematically analyze implementation strategies, barriers, facilitators, and outcomes of interventions. Subsequently, implementation science in Germany is examined with regard to specific projects, institutional integration, teaching, and networking among experts. The article concludes with a critical reflection on the limitations and potential of implementation science for public health in Germany.An English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink as Supplementary Information.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"718-727"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04077-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of high-quality, evidence-based practice to improve the health of populations is a prerequisite and a core element of public health. However, gaps frequently exist between research and practice, leading to the underuse of effective interventions and misuse of inappropriate interventions. Implementation science aims to bridge the gap between knowledge production and implementation by generating evidence to improve the transfer of research findings and evidence-based practices into routine action. This discussion article reflects on the state of implementation science in Germany. First, we provide a descriptive classification of implementation science, followed by a review of selected theories, models, and frameworks that are used in implementation research to systematically analyze implementation strategies, barriers, facilitators, and outcomes of interventions. Subsequently, implementation science in Germany is examined with regard to specific projects, institutional integration, teaching, and networking among experts. The article concludes with a critical reflection on the limitations and potential of implementation science for public health in Germany.An English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink as Supplementary Information.

[现状、分类和实施研究的潜力:德国公共卫生清单]。
实施以证据为基础的高质量做法以改善人口健康是公共卫生的先决条件和核心要素。然而,研究与实践之间经常存在差距,导致有效干预措施的使用不足和不适当干预措施的滥用。实施科学旨在通过产生证据来改善将研究成果和以证据为基础的实践转化为日常行动,从而弥合知识生产和实施之间的差距。本文对德国实施科学的现状进行了反思。首先,我们对实施科学进行了描述性分类,然后对实施研究中使用的理论、模型和框架进行了回顾,以系统地分析实施策略、障碍、促进因素和干预措施的结果。随后,在具体项目、机构整合、教学和专家之间的网络方面,对德国的实施科学进行了审查。文章最后对德国公共卫生实施科学的局限性和潜力进行了批判性反思。本文的英文全文作为补充信息可在SpringerLink上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信