[Participatory approaches in the development of AI applications in medicine: opportunities and challenges].

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Carolin Heizmann, Patricia Gleim, Philipp Kellmeyer
{"title":"[Participatory approaches in the development of AI applications in medicine: opportunities and challenges].","authors":"Carolin Heizmann, Patricia Gleim, Philipp Kellmeyer","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04095-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare not only holds the potential for efficiency gains, personalized medicine, and evidence-based decisions but also raises ethical and social challenges, such as bias, lack of transparency, and acceptance. Participatory approaches that actively involve patients, physicians, caregivers, and other stakeholders in the development process make it possible to align technological innovations with actual needs and to design them in a socially just way.The analysis distinguishes between participation as active co-design and partaking as access to social resources. Theoretical models such as the \"ladder of participation\" (Arnstein) illustrate the different levels of participation. In addition, methodological approaches such as action research, community-based participatory research, ethics by design, and value-sensitive design are discussed, which promote early ethical reflection and continuous user feedback.Practical examples such as KIPA (AI-supported patient information), KIDELIR (delirium prevention in care), and PRIVETDIS (neurotechnologies and mental privacy) show how participatory research can contribute to the optimization of care concepts. In addition to opportunities such as increased acceptance and user-centered technology design, challenges are identified, including limited resources, lack of representativeness, and invisible additional burdens for those involved. Finally, it is emphasized that in addition to technical and regulatory measures, continuous ethical reflection and transparent communication are essential to implement trustworthy and effective AI systems in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04095-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare not only holds the potential for efficiency gains, personalized medicine, and evidence-based decisions but also raises ethical and social challenges, such as bias, lack of transparency, and acceptance. Participatory approaches that actively involve patients, physicians, caregivers, and other stakeholders in the development process make it possible to align technological innovations with actual needs and to design them in a socially just way.The analysis distinguishes between participation as active co-design and partaking as access to social resources. Theoretical models such as the "ladder of participation" (Arnstein) illustrate the different levels of participation. In addition, methodological approaches such as action research, community-based participatory research, ethics by design, and value-sensitive design are discussed, which promote early ethical reflection and continuous user feedback.Practical examples such as KIPA (AI-supported patient information), KIDELIR (delirium prevention in care), and PRIVETDIS (neurotechnologies and mental privacy) show how participatory research can contribute to the optimization of care concepts. In addition to opportunities such as increased acceptance and user-centered technology design, challenges are identified, including limited resources, lack of representativeness, and invisible additional burdens for those involved. Finally, it is emphasized that in addition to technical and regulatory measures, continuous ethical reflection and transparent communication are essential to implement trustworthy and effective AI systems in healthcare.

[人工智能在医学应用开发中的参与式方法:机遇与挑战]。
人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的日益整合不仅具有提高效率、个性化医疗和基于证据的决策的潜力,而且还带来了伦理和社会挑战,例如偏见、缺乏透明度和接受度。让患者、医生、护理人员和其他利益攸关方积极参与开发过程的参与式方法,使技术创新与实际需求保持一致,并以社会公正的方式进行设计成为可能。该分析区分了作为积极共同设计的参与和作为获取社会资源的参与。像“参与阶梯”(阿恩斯坦)这样的理论模型说明了参与的不同层次。此外,还讨论了诸如行动研究、社区参与研究、设计伦理和价值敏感设计等方法学方法,这些方法促进了早期伦理反思和持续的用户反馈。KIPA(人工智能支持的患者信息)、KIDELIR(护理中的谵妄预防)和PRIVETDIS(神经技术和精神隐私)等实际例子表明,参与式研究如何有助于优化护理概念。除了诸如增加接受度和以用户为中心的技术设计等机会之外,还确定了挑战,包括资源有限、缺乏代表性以及相关人员的无形额外负担。最后,强调除了技术和监管措施外,持续的道德反思和透明的沟通对于在医疗保健中实施值得信赖和有效的人工智能系统至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信