Factors influencing physical healthcare quality for people with intellectual disabilities: psychiatry multidisciplinary team perspective.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Madiha Majid, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Bronwyn Harris, Ashok Roy, Hayley Crawford
{"title":"Factors influencing physical healthcare quality for people with intellectual disabilities: psychiatry multidisciplinary team perspective.","authors":"Madiha Majid, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Bronwyn Harris, Ashok Roy, Hayley Crawford","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need for better collaborative care between services to improve healthcare provision for people with intellectual disabilities. In the UK, the learning disability psychiatry multidisciplinary team (MDT) is a specialist team responsible for providing and coordinating care for people with intellectual disabilities.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To document learning disability MDT perspectives on factors influencing healthcare quality for people with intellectual disabilities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Healthcare professionals who were members of a learning disability MDT within a National Health Service Trust in the West Midlands were purposively sampled for interview (<i>n</i> = 11). Participants included psychiatrists, nurses, occupational therapists and speech and language therapists. Data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-stage approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors influencing the quality of healthcare provision included: the learning disability MDT working to overcome systemic barriers; the consequences of specific failures within mainstream healthcare services, such as diagnostic overshadowing; inadequate use of information collated in health passports; and inadequate capacity assessments of people with intellectual disabilities. Improvements in healthcare provision for people with intellectual disabilities require better accessibility to healthcare and better training for healthcare professionals so they can understand the health needs of people with intellectual disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A rapid review of practices around health passports for people with intellectual disabilities should be conducted. Healthcare professionals working in mainstream healthcare services need an increased awareness of the harms of diagnostic overshadowing and inadequate capacity assessments. Conclusions are based on findings from MDTs within one health board; future work may focus on understanding perspectives from different teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 4","pages":"e137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a need for better collaborative care between services to improve healthcare provision for people with intellectual disabilities. In the UK, the learning disability psychiatry multidisciplinary team (MDT) is a specialist team responsible for providing and coordinating care for people with intellectual disabilities.

Aims: To document learning disability MDT perspectives on factors influencing healthcare quality for people with intellectual disabilities.

Method: Healthcare professionals who were members of a learning disability MDT within a National Health Service Trust in the West Midlands were purposively sampled for interview (n = 11). Participants included psychiatrists, nurses, occupational therapists and speech and language therapists. Data were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-stage approach.

Results: Factors influencing the quality of healthcare provision included: the learning disability MDT working to overcome systemic barriers; the consequences of specific failures within mainstream healthcare services, such as diagnostic overshadowing; inadequate use of information collated in health passports; and inadequate capacity assessments of people with intellectual disabilities. Improvements in healthcare provision for people with intellectual disabilities require better accessibility to healthcare and better training for healthcare professionals so they can understand the health needs of people with intellectual disabilities.

Conclusions: A rapid review of practices around health passports for people with intellectual disabilities should be conducted. Healthcare professionals working in mainstream healthcare services need an increased awareness of the harms of diagnostic overshadowing and inadequate capacity assessments. Conclusions are based on findings from MDTs within one health board; future work may focus on understanding perspectives from different teams.

影响智力残疾者身体保健质量的因素:精神病学多学科团队视角。
背景:需要更好的服务之间的协作护理,以改善对智障人士的医疗保健提供。在英国,学习障碍精神病学多学科团队(MDT)是一个专业团队,负责为智障人士提供和协调护理。目的:从学习障碍MDT的角度探讨影响智力残疾者医疗保健质量的因素。方法:在西米德兰兹郡的一个国家卫生服务信托学习障碍MDT成员的医疗保健专业人员有目的地抽样进行访谈(n = 11)。参与者包括精神科医生、护士、职业治疗师和语言治疗师。使用Braun和Clarke的六阶段方法对数据进行了主题分析。结果:影响医疗服务质量的因素包括:学习障碍MDT努力克服体制性障碍;主流医疗保健服务中特定失败的后果,如诊断遮蔽;未充分利用卫生护照中整理的信息;对智障人士的能力评估不足。改善对智力残疾者的保健服务,需要更好地获得保健服务,并对保健专业人员进行更好的培训,使他们能够了解智力残疾者的保健需求。结论:应对智力残疾者健康护照的做法进行快速审查。在主流医疗保健服务机构工作的医疗保健专业人员需要提高对诊断掩盖和能力评估不足的危害的认识。结论是基于一个卫生委员会内MDTs的调查结果;未来的工作可能侧重于理解来自不同团队的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信