Radiological Outcomes in Recovered COVID-19 Pneumonia Cases at 1-year Follow-up: The "Post-COVID-19 Lung Study" in Dedicated COVID-19 Care Setting in India.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shital Patil, Devang Kulkarni, Abhishek Vairagade, Gajanan Gondhali
{"title":"Radiological Outcomes in Recovered COVID-19 Pneumonia Cases at 1-year Follow-up: The \"Post-COVID-19 Lung Study\" in Dedicated COVID-19 Care Setting in India.","authors":"Shital Patil, Devang Kulkarni, Abhishek Vairagade, Gajanan Gondhali","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_22_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radiological outcomes are initially interpreted as post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis in short-term follow-up of recovered COVID-19 cases in post-COVID-19 care settings and during long-term evaluation, these abnormalities are defined as post-COVID-19 sequalae's. In the present study, post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities were evaluated as \"residual lung abnormalities (RLAs)\" as radiological outcomes phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, observational study initially included 1000 COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction confirmed cases with lung involvement documented and radiological severity phenotypes categorized on high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) thorax as mild, moderate, and severe as per lung segment involvement bilaterally at the entry point. Final radiological outcomes were defined by performing a radiological assessment done at 1 year of discharge from the hospital in cases with specified inclusion criteria. Radiological final outcome phenotypes were defined as radiological lung abnormalities (RLAs) and categorized as resolving, persistent, and progressive types documented in HRCT imaging at 1 year of follow-up. Finally, we have included 209 cases with RLAs. Covariates recordings of age, gender, comorbidity, laboratory parameters, and interventions such as oxygen support and oxygen plus ventilatory support requirement during hospitalization were done. Statistical analysis is done using Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RLAs were documented in 20.73% (209/1000) cases. Final radiological outcomes were documented as resolving at 72.24% (151/209), persistent 19.61% (41/209), and progressive 8.13% (17/209). A significant association was documented between RLAs and duration of illness at the entry point (P < 0.00001), laboratory parameters at the entry point (D-dimer, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6) (P < 0.00001), radiological computerized tomography severity phenotypes (P < 0.00001), and interventions required in the indoor unit (P < 0.00001). A significant association was observed between RLAs with covariates such as age, gender, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, and lung functions assessment by spirometry at 1 year follow-up (P < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiological lung abnormalities (RLAs) are new radiological classification of post-COVID-19 lung sequelae and are categorized as resolving, persistent, and progressive. Final outcomes phenotypic classification showed an important role in further workup and treatment plannings of these RLAs during follow-up. Importantly, the proportionate number of progressive phenotypes has underlying rheumatological predisposition, and the large number of cases in resolving phenotypes doesn't need any treatment; whereas few cases in the persistent category need protocolized follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_22_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Radiological outcomes are initially interpreted as post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis in short-term follow-up of recovered COVID-19 cases in post-COVID-19 care settings and during long-term evaluation, these abnormalities are defined as post-COVID-19 sequalae's. In the present study, post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities were evaluated as "residual lung abnormalities (RLAs)" as radiological outcomes phenotypes.

Methods: Prospective, observational study initially included 1000 COVID-19 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction confirmed cases with lung involvement documented and radiological severity phenotypes categorized on high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) thorax as mild, moderate, and severe as per lung segment involvement bilaterally at the entry point. Final radiological outcomes were defined by performing a radiological assessment done at 1 year of discharge from the hospital in cases with specified inclusion criteria. Radiological final outcome phenotypes were defined as radiological lung abnormalities (RLAs) and categorized as resolving, persistent, and progressive types documented in HRCT imaging at 1 year of follow-up. Finally, we have included 209 cases with RLAs. Covariates recordings of age, gender, comorbidity, laboratory parameters, and interventions such as oxygen support and oxygen plus ventilatory support requirement during hospitalization were done. Statistical analysis is done using Chi-square test.

Results: RLAs were documented in 20.73% (209/1000) cases. Final radiological outcomes were documented as resolving at 72.24% (151/209), persistent 19.61% (41/209), and progressive 8.13% (17/209). A significant association was documented between RLAs and duration of illness at the entry point (P < 0.00001), laboratory parameters at the entry point (D-dimer, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6) (P < 0.00001), radiological computerized tomography severity phenotypes (P < 0.00001), and interventions required in the indoor unit (P < 0.00001). A significant association was observed between RLAs with covariates such as age, gender, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, and lung functions assessment by spirometry at 1 year follow-up (P < 0.00001).

Conclusions: Radiological lung abnormalities (RLAs) are new radiological classification of post-COVID-19 lung sequelae and are categorized as resolving, persistent, and progressive. Final outcomes phenotypic classification showed an important role in further workup and treatment plannings of these RLAs during follow-up. Importantly, the proportionate number of progressive phenotypes has underlying rheumatological predisposition, and the large number of cases in resolving phenotypes doesn't need any treatment; whereas few cases in the persistent category need protocolized follow-up.

1年随访中康复的COVID-19肺炎病例的放射学结果:印度专门的COVID-19护理机构的“后COVID-19肺部研究”
在COVID-19后护理机构对康复的COVID-19病例进行短期随访时,影像学结果最初被解释为COVID-19后肺纤维化,在长期评估中,这些异常被定义为COVID-19后后遗症。在本研究中,covid -19后肺部异常被评估为“残余肺异常(RLAs)”作为放射预后表型。方法:前瞻性观察性研究最初纳入了1000例经COVID-19逆转录聚合酶链反应确诊的肺部受累病例,并在高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)上根据入口处双侧肺段受累情况将其放射学严重程度表型分为轻度、中度和重度。最终的放射学结果是通过在符合特定纳入标准的病例出院1年时进行的放射学评估来确定的。放射学最终结果表型被定义为放射学肺异常(RLAs),并在随访1年的HRCT成像中分为消退型、持续性和进行性。最后,我们纳入了209例rla病例。协变量包括年龄、性别、合并症、实验室参数和干预措施,如住院期间的氧支持和氧加通气支持需求。统计分析采用卡方检验。结果:rla发生率为20.73%(209/1000)。最终影像学结果显示:消退率为72.24%(151/209),持续率为19.61%(41/209),进展率为8.13%(17/209)。RLAs与入院时的病程(P < 0.00001)、入院时的实验室参数(d -二聚体、c反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6)(P < 0.00001)、放射学计算机断层扫描严重程度表型(P < 0.00001)和室内机所需干预(P < 0.00001)之间存在显著关联。RLAs与年龄、性别、糖尿病、缺血性心脏病、高血压、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肥胖、1年随访肺活量测定肺功能评估等协变量存在显著相关性(P < 0.00001)。结论:放射学肺异常(RLAs)是新型冠状病毒肺炎后肺部后遗症的影像学新分类,分为消退性、持续性和进行性。最终结果表型分类在这些RLAs随访期间的进一步随访和治疗计划中发挥了重要作用。重要的是,进展型的比例数量具有潜在的风湿病易感性,而解决型的大量病例不需要任何治疗;然而,在持久性类别中,很少有病例需要按协议进行随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信