Mid-FTIR and machine learning for predicting fig leaf macronutrients content.

IF 1.8 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Lahcen Hssaini, Rachid Razouk
{"title":"Mid-FTIR and machine learning for predicting fig leaf macronutrients content.","authors":"Lahcen Hssaini, Rachid Razouk","doi":"10.1007/s44211-025-00814-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting leaf mineral composition is critical for monitoring plant health and optimizing agricultural practices. This study combines Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) and machine learning (ML) to specific macronutrients, namely nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg), in fig leaves (Ficus carica L.). A dataset of 90 leaves was analyzed, with FTIR spectra (450-4000 cm⁻<sup>1</sup>) preprocessed via baseline correction and second-derivative transformations. Three ML models were evaluated using fivefold cross-validation including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Gradient Boosting (GB), with performance assessed via root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), and ratio of performance to deviation (RPD). GB outperformed other models, achieving validation RMSE/RPD values of 0.133/1.60 (nitrogen, N), 0.0107/1.79 (phosphorus, P), 0.1328/1.65 (potassium, K), 0.0636/1.96 (magnesium, Mg), and 0.2657/1.60 (calcium, Ca). Predictions for Mg (validation R<sup>2</sup> = 0.7351) and P (validation R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6873) exhibited the highest accuracy, potentially attributed to their stronger or more distinct spectral features (e.g., Mg-O stretching around 1050- 1150 cm⁻<sup>1</sup>; P-O vibrations around 1240 cm⁻<sup>1</sup>). Cross-validation revealed robust generalization for GB; while mean training RMSE was very low (< 0.01 for P and Mg), validation RMSE remained relatively low, underscoring the model's utility for screening (RPD > 1.5). Despite evidence of overfitting (training R<sup>2</sup> ≈ 0.999 vs. validation R<sup>2</sup> = 0.61-0.74), GB's performance evaluated using both RMSE and RPD confirmed its superiority over RF and SVR, which showed higher errors (e.g., SVR for Ca: RMSE = 0.4574, RPD = 1.07). This study demonstrates that FTIR-ATR coupled with ML is a rapid, non-destructive alternative to conventional destructive chemical analysis and that GB's reliability, as indicated by RPD values > 1.5, offers actionable insights for precision nutrient management in sustainable agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":7802,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44211-025-00814-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting leaf mineral composition is critical for monitoring plant health and optimizing agricultural practices. This study combines Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy with attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) and machine learning (ML) to specific macronutrients, namely nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg), in fig leaves (Ficus carica L.). A dataset of 90 leaves was analyzed, with FTIR spectra (450-4000 cm⁻1) preprocessed via baseline correction and second-derivative transformations. Three ML models were evaluated using fivefold cross-validation including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Gradient Boosting (GB), with performance assessed via root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and ratio of performance to deviation (RPD). GB outperformed other models, achieving validation RMSE/RPD values of 0.133/1.60 (nitrogen, N), 0.0107/1.79 (phosphorus, P), 0.1328/1.65 (potassium, K), 0.0636/1.96 (magnesium, Mg), and 0.2657/1.60 (calcium, Ca). Predictions for Mg (validation R2 = 0.7351) and P (validation R2 = 0.6873) exhibited the highest accuracy, potentially attributed to their stronger or more distinct spectral features (e.g., Mg-O stretching around 1050- 1150 cm⁻1; P-O vibrations around 1240 cm⁻1). Cross-validation revealed robust generalization for GB; while mean training RMSE was very low (< 0.01 for P and Mg), validation RMSE remained relatively low, underscoring the model's utility for screening (RPD > 1.5). Despite evidence of overfitting (training R2 ≈ 0.999 vs. validation R2 = 0.61-0.74), GB's performance evaluated using both RMSE and RPD confirmed its superiority over RF and SVR, which showed higher errors (e.g., SVR for Ca: RMSE = 0.4574, RPD = 1.07). This study demonstrates that FTIR-ATR coupled with ML is a rapid, non-destructive alternative to conventional destructive chemical analysis and that GB's reliability, as indicated by RPD values > 1.5, offers actionable insights for precision nutrient management in sustainable agriculture.

中傅里叶红外光谱和机器学习预测无花果叶常量营养素含量。
预测叶片矿物成分对监测植物健康和优化农业实践至关重要。本研究将傅里叶变换红外光谱与衰减全反射(FTIR-ATR)和机器学习(ML)相结合,研究无花果(Ficus carica L.)叶片中的特定常量营养素,即氮(N)、磷(P)、钾(K)、钙(Ca)和镁(Mg)。对90片叶子的数据集进行分析,通过基线校正和二阶导数变换对FTIR光谱(450-4000 cm - 1)进行预处理。采用随机森林(Random Forest, RF)、支持向量回归(Support Vector Regression, SVR)和梯度增强(Gradient Boosting, GB)三种ML模型进行五重交叉验证,并通过均方根误差(root mean square error, RMSE)、决定系数(coefficient of determination, R2)和性能偏差比(performance to deviation, RPD)来评估其性能。GB模型的验证RMSE/RPD值优于其他模型,分别为0.133/1.60(氮,N)、0.0107/1.79(磷,P)、0.1328/1.65(钾,K)、0.0636/1.96(镁,Mg)和0.2657/1.60(钙,Ca)。预测毫克(验证R2 = 0.7351)和P(验证R2 = 0.6873)表现出最高的准确性,可能归因于他们的更强大、更独特的光谱特性(例如,Mg-O延伸约1050 - 1150厘米⁻1;P-O振动在1240厘米左右(1)。交叉验证显示了GB的稳健泛化;而平均训练RMSE非常低(1.5)。尽管存在过拟合的证据(训练R2≈0.999 vs验证R2 = 0.61-0.74),但使用RMSE和RPD评估GB的性能证实了其优于RF和SVR,后者显示出更高的误差(例如,Ca的SVR: RMSE = 0.4574, RPD = 1.07)。本研究表明,FTIR-ATR结合ML是传统破坏性化学分析的快速、非破坏性替代方法,并且GB的可靠性(RPD值为> 1.5)为可持续农业的精确养分管理提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analytical Sciences
Analytical Sciences 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
232
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Sciences is an international journal published monthly by The Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry. The journal publishes papers on all aspects of the theory and practice of analytical sciences, including fundamental and applied, inorganic and organic, wet chemical and instrumental methods. This publication is supported in part by the Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Result of the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信