Bridging equity and sustainability: A heterogeneous analysis of poverty, inequality, and green growth's impact on environmental sustainability in BRI economies.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126364
Ali Zeb, Obaid Ullah, Asim Zeb
{"title":"Bridging equity and sustainability: A heterogeneous analysis of poverty, inequality, and green growth's impact on environmental sustainability in BRI economies.","authors":"Ali Zeb, Obaid Ullah, Asim Zeb","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rising perseverance of environmental sustainability has drawn attention of environmentalists and scholars across the globe. In this regard, the present study analyzes the effect of socioeconomic indicators including poverty (POV), inequality (GINI), and green economic growth (GEG) on environmental sustainability (ECF). Which is concentrating on United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG, s) specifically focussing (eradicating poverty) SDG 1, SDG 10 (reducing inequality) SDG 10, and (endorsing green growth) SDG 8 within Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries. Although preceding studies have explored some of these associations, but still there remains a need for more inclusive, regionally comparative evidence that integrates socioeconomic and environmental magnitudes. Our study discourses this by using aggregate and disaggregate analyses across Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and South Asia, providing more detailed insights and enabling regional assessments. By employing advanced Panel Quantile Regression (PQR) and Non-Parametric technique Panel Quantile on Quantile Kernel-Based Regularized Least Squares (PQQKRLS), the study's outcome disclose that poverty (POV) significantly increases ecological footprints across all quantiles, while inequality (GINI) negatively impacts environmental quality from the 25th to 90th quantiles. Green Economic Growth (GEG) shows mixed effects, being positive and significant at the 25th and 50th quantiles. Robustness of the results is confirmed through the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS), Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) techniques. Based on these insights, the study offers empirical mark that may inform regional discussions on inclusive and environmentally sustainable development, mainly in relation to Sustainable Development Goals such as (No Poverty) SDG-1, (Reduced Inequalities) SDG-10, Decent Work and Economic Growth) SDG-8, and SDG-13 (Climate Action). The associations acknowledged can assist as a base for further research or policymaking tailored to specific regional contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"390 ","pages":"126364"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising perseverance of environmental sustainability has drawn attention of environmentalists and scholars across the globe. In this regard, the present study analyzes the effect of socioeconomic indicators including poverty (POV), inequality (GINI), and green economic growth (GEG) on environmental sustainability (ECF). Which is concentrating on United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG, s) specifically focussing (eradicating poverty) SDG 1, SDG 10 (reducing inequality) SDG 10, and (endorsing green growth) SDG 8 within Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries. Although preceding studies have explored some of these associations, but still there remains a need for more inclusive, regionally comparative evidence that integrates socioeconomic and environmental magnitudes. Our study discourses this by using aggregate and disaggregate analyses across Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and South Asia, providing more detailed insights and enabling regional assessments. By employing advanced Panel Quantile Regression (PQR) and Non-Parametric technique Panel Quantile on Quantile Kernel-Based Regularized Least Squares (PQQKRLS), the study's outcome disclose that poverty (POV) significantly increases ecological footprints across all quantiles, while inequality (GINI) negatively impacts environmental quality from the 25th to 90th quantiles. Green Economic Growth (GEG) shows mixed effects, being positive and significant at the 25th and 50th quantiles. Robustness of the results is confirmed through the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS), Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) techniques. Based on these insights, the study offers empirical mark that may inform regional discussions on inclusive and environmentally sustainable development, mainly in relation to Sustainable Development Goals such as (No Poverty) SDG-1, (Reduced Inequalities) SDG-10, Decent Work and Economic Growth) SDG-8, and SDG-13 (Climate Action). The associations acknowledged can assist as a base for further research or policymaking tailored to specific regional contexts.

衔接公平与可持续性:贫困、不平等和绿色增长对“一带一路”经济体环境可持续性影响的异质性分析。
对环境可持续性的不懈追求引起了全球环保人士和学者的关注。因此,本研究分析了贫困(POV)、不平等(GINI)和绿色经济增长(GEG)等社会经济指标对环境可持续性(ECF)的影响。它专注于联合国(UN)可持续发展目标(SDG),特别是关注(消除贫困)可持续发展目标1,可持续发展目标10(减少不平等)可持续发展目标10,以及(支持绿色增长)可持续发展目标8在“一带一路”倡议(BRI)国家。虽然之前的研究已经探讨了其中的一些关联,但仍然需要更具包容性的、区域比较的证据,以整合社会经济和环境的规模。我们的研究通过对亚太、欧洲、中东、撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚的汇总和分类分析来论述这一点,提供了更详细的见解,并使区域评估成为可能。通过采用先进的面板分位数回归(PQR)和基于分位数核的正则化最小二乘(PQQKRLS)的非参数技术面板分位数,研究结果表明,贫困(POV)显著增加了所有分位数的生态足迹,而不平等(GINI)对第25至第90分位数的环境质量产生了负面影响。绿色经济增长(GEG)表现出混合效应,在第25分位数和第50分位数上是积极的和显著的。通过完全修正普通最小二乘(FMOLS)、动态普通最小二乘(DOLS)和广义矩量法(GMM)技术验证了结果的鲁棒性。基于这些见解,该研究提供了经验标志,可为包容性和环境可持续发展的区域讨论提供参考,主要涉及可持续发展目标,如(消除贫困)可持续发展目标1、(减少不平等)可持续发展目标10、体面工作和经济增长目标8和可持续发展目标13(气候行动)。所承认的协会可作为进一步研究或根据具体区域情况制定政策的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信