Non-GAAP Reporting Decisions and the Enhanced Fraud Triangle: The Role of Capability

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Valerie C. Simmons, Dana R. Hermanson, Velina K. Popova
{"title":"Non-GAAP Reporting Decisions and the Enhanced Fraud Triangle: The Role of Capability","authors":"Valerie C. Simmons,&nbsp;Dana R. Hermanson,&nbsp;Velina K. Popova","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Based on an experiment with 92 US public company financial executives, we use the enhanced fraud triangle framework (pressure, opportunity and capability) to understand controllers' response to CFO pressure to opportunistically manipulate non-GAAP earnings. Overall, we find that capability factors are associated with controllers' behaviour in our experimental setting, with some evidence of pressure effects as well. Specifically, we find that controller bonus type, perceptions of the CEO's role in pressure from the CFO, the perceived ethicality of the action, the fairness of the decision process and whether participants have seen a similar situation in practice are significantly related to controllers' decisions. Overall, our results and other recent research findings point to the important role of capability in understanding and assessing fraud risk. We hope that the findings will be useful to auditors, and we encourage auditing standard setters to consider emphasizing capability in their fraud-related standards.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":"29 3","pages":"421-435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijau.12377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on an experiment with 92 US public company financial executives, we use the enhanced fraud triangle framework (pressure, opportunity and capability) to understand controllers' response to CFO pressure to opportunistically manipulate non-GAAP earnings. Overall, we find that capability factors are associated with controllers' behaviour in our experimental setting, with some evidence of pressure effects as well. Specifically, we find that controller bonus type, perceptions of the CEO's role in pressure from the CFO, the perceived ethicality of the action, the fairness of the decision process and whether participants have seen a similar situation in practice are significantly related to controllers' decisions. Overall, our results and other recent research findings point to the important role of capability in understanding and assessing fraud risk. We hope that the findings will be useful to auditors, and we encourage auditing standard setters to consider emphasizing capability in their fraud-related standards.

非公认会计准则报告决策和强化的舞弊三角:能力的作用
基于对92名美国上市公司财务高管的实验,我们使用增强的欺诈三角框架(压力、机会和能力)来理解控制人对CFO机会性操纵非公认会计准则收益的压力的反应。总的来说,我们发现在我们的实验设置中,能力因素与控制器的行为有关,也有一些压力效应的证据。具体而言,我们发现控制人的奖金类型、CEO在CFO压力下的角色感知、行为的道德感知、决策过程的公平性以及参与者是否在实践中看到类似的情况与控制人的决策显著相关。总的来说,我们的结果和其他最近的研究发现指出了能力在理解和评估欺诈风险方面的重要作用。我们希望这些发现对审计人员有用,我们鼓励审计准则制定者考虑在其与欺诈相关的准则中强调能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: In addition to communicating the results of original auditing research, the International Journal of Auditing also aims to advance knowledge in auditing by publishing critiques, thought leadership papers and literature reviews on specific aspects of auditing. The journal seeks to publish articles that have international appeal either due to the topic transcending national frontiers or due to the clear potential for readers to apply the results or ideas in their local environments. While articles must be methodologically and theoretically sound, any research orientation is acceptable. This means that papers may have an analytical and statistical, behavioural, economic and financial (including agency), sociological, critical, or historical basis. The editors consider articles for publication which fit into one or more of the following subject categories: • Financial statement audits • Public sector/governmental auditing • Internal auditing • Audit education and methods of teaching auditing (including case studies) • Audit aspects of corporate governance, including audit committees • Audit quality • Audit fees and related issues • Environmental, social and sustainability audits • Audit related ethical issues • Audit regulation • Independence issues • Legal liability and other legal issues • Auditing history • New and emerging audit and assurance issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信