An Investigation Into Gross Motor Skill Intervention Provisions for Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder in the Republic of Ireland: Cross Sectional Study

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Mary Mannion, Kieran Dowd, Niamh Ni Cheilleachair
{"title":"An Investigation Into Gross Motor Skill Intervention Provisions for Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder in the Republic of Ireland: Cross Sectional Study","authors":"Mary Mannion,&nbsp;Kieran Dowd,&nbsp;Niamh Ni Cheilleachair","doi":"10.1111/cch.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) often experience gross motor (GM) challenges. Left untreated, children may experience lasting physical, social and emotional repercussions. Limited information is available on the accessibility of GM-specific interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The study objectives were to identify, (1) past intervention experiences, (2) present provisions and needs and (3) barriers which may prevent children from receiving future GM intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A modified Delphi technique was used for the online survey development. Parents of children with DCD were recruited through voluntary DCD support organisations, social media and existing participants. Frequency analysis was used for fixed response questions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Completed by 237 parents of children with DCD, this survey represented 70.8% males (<i>n</i> = 168); 28.7% females (<i>n</i> = 68); 0.5% not specified (<i>n</i> = 1) with a median age of 10.0 (IQR = 3.0) and diagnosis age of 7.0 (IQR = 3.0). Referrals were to occupational therapists (OT) (63.5%) for activities of daily living (30.9%) and GM challenges (29.0%). Waiting lists were prevalent (76%) with 43.9% waiting longer than 12 months for intervention. Lengthy wait times for publicly funded intervention programs (61.0%) and cost-prohibitive private therapy (26.2%) were cited as the primary reasons for some not yet receiving GM skill intervention. Few parents are involved in the interventions (14.3%), yet most parents (98.6%) expressed a willingness to help.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>GM dysfunction is a primary concern of DCD noted by parents and teachers, yet delayed diagnosis and lengthy waiting lists prohibit children from receiving timely and targeted GM intervention. Alternative methods of delivery with parental involvement should be considered to accommodate the vast numbers of children in need.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n \n <li>Occupational therapists (OTs) and teachers are identified as the top providers of motor skill intervention for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD).</li>\n \n \n <li>Gross motor (GM) challenges are a primary concern for children with DCD, yet the treatment received likely prioritises activities of daily living (ADL) over GM difficulties.</li>\n \n \n <li>Targeted GM intervention is necessary but not often available due to lengthy waiting lists for publicly funded programmes and the high cost of private treatment.</li>\n \n \n <li>Although parents express a willingness to participate in the intervention process, their involvement is infrequently utilised.</li>\n \n \n <li>Collaborations between parents, teachers and therapists should be considered to make intervention more accessible and effective.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55262,"journal":{"name":"Child Care Health and Development","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cch.70127","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Care Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cch.70127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) often experience gross motor (GM) challenges. Left untreated, children may experience lasting physical, social and emotional repercussions. Limited information is available on the accessibility of GM-specific interventions.

Objectives

The study objectives were to identify, (1) past intervention experiences, (2) present provisions and needs and (3) barriers which may prevent children from receiving future GM intervention.

Method

A modified Delphi technique was used for the online survey development. Parents of children with DCD were recruited through voluntary DCD support organisations, social media and existing participants. Frequency analysis was used for fixed response questions.

Results

Completed by 237 parents of children with DCD, this survey represented 70.8% males (n = 168); 28.7% females (n = 68); 0.5% not specified (n = 1) with a median age of 10.0 (IQR = 3.0) and diagnosis age of 7.0 (IQR = 3.0). Referrals were to occupational therapists (OT) (63.5%) for activities of daily living (30.9%) and GM challenges (29.0%). Waiting lists were prevalent (76%) with 43.9% waiting longer than 12 months for intervention. Lengthy wait times for publicly funded intervention programs (61.0%) and cost-prohibitive private therapy (26.2%) were cited as the primary reasons for some not yet receiving GM skill intervention. Few parents are involved in the interventions (14.3%), yet most parents (98.6%) expressed a willingness to help.

Conclusion

GM dysfunction is a primary concern of DCD noted by parents and teachers, yet delayed diagnosis and lengthy waiting lists prohibit children from receiving timely and targeted GM intervention. Alternative methods of delivery with parental involvement should be considered to accommodate the vast numbers of children in need.

Summary

  • Occupational therapists (OTs) and teachers are identified as the top providers of motor skill intervention for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD).
  • Gross motor (GM) challenges are a primary concern for children with DCD, yet the treatment received likely prioritises activities of daily living (ADL) over GM difficulties.
  • Targeted GM intervention is necessary but not often available due to lengthy waiting lists for publicly funded programmes and the high cost of private treatment.
  • Although parents express a willingness to participate in the intervention process, their involvement is infrequently utilised.
  • Collaborations between parents, teachers and therapists should be considered to make intervention more accessible and effective.

Abstract Image

爱尔兰共和国发展性协调障碍儿童大动作技能干预措施的调查:横断面研究
背景:患有发育协调障碍(DCD)的儿童经常经历大肌肉运动(GM)的挑战。如果不及时治疗,儿童可能会经历持久的身体、社会和情感影响。关于获得特定转基因干预措施的信息有限。本研究的目的是确定:(1)过去的干预经验,(2)目前的规定和需求,以及(3)可能阻止儿童接受未来转基因干预的障碍。方法采用改进的德尔菲法进行在线调查。残疾儿童的家长是通过自愿残疾儿童支持组织、社交媒体和现有参与者招募的。频率分析用于固定回答问题。结果共237例DCD患儿家长,男性占70.8% (n = 168);女性28.7% (n = 68);0.5%未明确(n = 1),中位年龄为10.0 (IQR = 3.0),诊断年龄为7.0 (IQR = 3.0)。因日常生活活动(30.9%)和GM挑战(29.0%)被转介给职业治疗师(OT)(63.5%)。等候名单普遍存在(76%),其中43.9%等待干预时间超过12个月。等待公共资助干预项目的时间过长(61.0%)和昂贵的私人治疗(26.2%)被认为是一些尚未接受转基因技能干预的主要原因。很少有家长参与干预(14.3%),但大多数家长(98.6%)表示愿意提供帮助。结论基因功能障碍是家长和老师关注的主要问题,但诊断延迟和等待时间长使儿童无法及时接受有针对性的基因干预。应考虑有父母参与的其他分娩方法,以照顾大量有需要的儿童。职业治疗师和教师被认为是发展性协调障碍(DCD)儿童运动技能干预的主要提供者。大肌肉运动(GM)挑战是DCD儿童的主要问题,但所接受的治疗可能优先考虑日常生活活动(ADL)而不是GM困难。有针对性的基因改造干预是必要的,但由于公共资助项目的等待名单很长,私人治疗的费用很高,因此往往无法实现。虽然家长表示愿意参与干预过程,但他们的参与很少得到利用。应考虑家长、教师和治疗师之间的合作,使干预更容易获得和有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Child: care, health and development is an international, peer-reviewed journal which publishes papers dealing with all aspects of the health and development of children and young people. We aim to attract quantitative and qualitative research papers relevant to people from all disciplines working in child health. We welcome studies which examine the effects of social and environmental factors on health and development as well as those dealing with clinical issues, the organization of services and health policy. We particularly encourage the submission of studies related to those who are disadvantaged by physical, developmental, emotional and social problems. The journal also aims to collate important research findings and to provide a forum for discussion of global child health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信